Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Content

Supreme Court Briefs returns with another landmark case, this time New York Times v. Sullivan. I thought it was particularly relevant considering all the 2020 election Big Lie lawsuit trials happening right now, particularly the massive lawsuit by Dominion Voting Systems against Fox News. 

Which Supreme Court case should I cover for this series next?

Thank you for your continued support!

Files

Previews only

Why Most People Lose Defamation Lawsuits | New York Times v. Sullivan

In episode 70 of Supreme Court Briefs, a police commissioner sues the New York Times for defamation after it runs an ad that talks trash about his department. Produced by Matt Beat. All images/video by Matt Beat, found in the public domain, or used under fair use guidelines. Music by @ElectricNeedleRoom(Beat's band). Download the song here: https://electricneedleroom.bandcamp.com/track/we-want-to-be Mr. Beat's Supreme Court Briefs playlist: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLHtE7NbaKRef-x3QBDpwvJsr6i1Z3I6TN Here's an annotated script with footnotes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IJIT7809e-BjuC1s961TdIJzbBjt1HJwO_JUVDpa5h4/edit?usp=sharing Check out cool primary sources here: https://www.oyez.org/cases/1789-1850/32us243 Other sources used: https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/525/barron-v-baltimore https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/32/243/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barron_v._Baltimore https://www.thirteen.org/wnet/supremecourt/antebellum/landmark_barron.html A related case: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCMQ5MrQfs0 Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmYesELO6axBrCuSpf7S9DQ/join For business inquiries or to send snail mail to Mr. Beat: https://www.iammrbeat.com/contact.html https://www.youtube.com/c/iammrbeat/about Connect with me: https://linktr.ee/iammrbeat Mr. Beat’s website: https://www.iammrbeat.com/ Mr. Beat’s second channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheBeatGoesOn1981 Mr. Beat's band: https://electricneedleroom.us/ How to support Mr. Beat: 💰Donate to Mr. Beat for great perks on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/iammrbeat 🤑Donate to Mr. Beat on Paypal: https://www.paypal.me/mrbeat ☕Buy Mr. Beat a coffee: https://ko-fi.com/iammrbeat “Free” ways to show support: ✔️Subscribe to my channel ⏰Turn on notifications 👍Like, share, and comment on my videos Buy Mr. Beat merch: https://matt-beat-shop.fourthwall.com/ https://www.bonfire.com/store/mr-beat/ https://sfsf.shop/support-mrbeat/ Buy Mr. Beat's book: https://amzn.to/386g7cz Amazon Storefront: https://www.amazon.com/shop/mr.beat Affiliate Links: Useful Charts: https://usefulcharts.com/?aff=12 Kids Connect: https://kidskonnect.com/?ref=iammrbeat Ekster: https://ekster.com?sca_ref=444709.jvllq3EEOm Shampoo: https://rb.gy/vlqeym Acne fighter: https://rb.gy/a6dnb0 #supremecourtbriefs #supremecourt #apgovt New York City March 29, 1960 The New York Times publishes a full-page advertisement called “Heed Their Rising Voices,” which aimed to shine a spotlight on the persecution of and violence against civil rights protestors throughout the South. It specifically talks trash about the Montgomery, Alabama police force, saying that they had arrested Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. seven times and that “truckloads” of them had stormed the Alabama State College. So uh…yeah…the ad had definitely stretched the truth. When Montgomery’s police commissioner, L.B. Sullivan, saw the ad, he was like “what the heck?!?” He viewed it as a personal attack on him and his entire police force. Even though the ad didn’t specifically name Sullivan, he decided to write the New York Times anyway, asking the newspaper to publish a retraction of the ad. In other words, Sullivan wanted the New York Times to take it all back and admit to publishing false information. Well, the New York Times issued no such retraction. Instead, its lawyers wrote Sullivan a nice little letter that said the newspaper had no good reason to publish a retraction. Specifically, their letter said, “we…are somewhat puzzled as to how you think the statements in any way reflect on you,” adding, “you might, if you desire, let us know in what respect you claim that the statements in the advertisement reflect on you.” Uh-huh. Sullivan didn’t like that so much, either. He sued the New York Times, saying the newspaper broke Alabama’s law for libel, a type of written defamation that hurt the reputation of someone or something. He also sued four African American ministers mentioned in the ad. After this, the New York Times did issue a retraction, but only for the Governor of Alabama, John Patterson….not Sullivan. In the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Sullivan only had to prove that the New York Times published mistakes and that they probably hurt his reputation. The court sided with Sullivan, ordering the New York Times to award him with $500,000 in damages, which is nearly $5 million in today’s money. The New York Times appealed to the Alabama Supreme Court, but it agreed with the lower court. After this, the newspaper appealed again, this time to the SUPREME Supreme Court, who agreed to hear oral arguments in January 1964. The New York Times, of course, argued that the freedom of speech and freedom of the press parts of the First Amendment protected their right to publish that ad. It also argued that Alabama’s libel law specifically went against the First Amendment.

Comments

Alex Gorell

I really do love your Supreme Court briefs they are my favorite videos of yours. I’m nervous this extremely activist court is going to go after this ruling as it did with Roe.

Matt Beat

I appreciate it, Alex. I wouldn't be so nervous. The conservative justices have expressed, more or less, that they agree with this ruling in principle. I'd be surprised if they got political on this issue.