Home
Creators
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register Favorites Keys Review DMs Logout
Community
Telegram ThePornDude
Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

MOVIE VOTING POLL FOR AUGUST (Patreon)

Published:
2022-07-23 19:10:55
Imported:
2026-06

Poll

MOVIE VOTING POLL FOR AUGUST

  • Barbarela 56
  • Eddie 17
  • Daemon Targaryen 9
  • Dean Winchester 19
  • Dutch Schaefer 25
  • Back to the Future 90
  • Star Light 83
  • 2022-07-23
  • —2022-07-30
  • 299 votes
{'title': 'MOVIE VOTING POLL FOR AUGUST', 'choices': [{'text': 'Barbarela', 'votes': 56}, {'text': 'Eddie', 'votes': 17}, {'text': 'Daemon Targaryen', 'votes': 9}, {'text': 'Dean Winchester', 'votes': 19}, {'text': 'Dutch Schaefer', 'votes': 25}, {'text': 'Back to the Future', 'votes': 90}, {'text': 'Star Light', 'votes': 83}], 'closes_at': datetime.datetime(2022, 7, 30, 19, 10, 16, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc), 'created_at': datetime.datetime(2022, 7, 23, 19, 4, 56, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc), 'description': None, 'allow_multiple': False, 'total_votes': 299}

Content

Hello guys! Here are your picks for next month's movie category.
My apologies if I did not pick your suggestions. I promise to give chance to everyone and put at least one of your suggestions in the coming months. :)


Comments

Sparkvark007

I’m pulling for Starlight. On the television show she has 2 completely different costumes. 3Dmoonn is offering her in her original outfit. We are voting on her in the Vought/Seven outfit. (Those familiar with the TV show know her history and the reasons for the difference.) Our benefactor has demonstrated a unique skill in rendering his subject matter in a near photorealistic style that fits my preference in the models I like to build. That’s why I signed up.

Dave Redhead

i know what you are saying but the back to the future model is just retro cool And lets be honest Parkinsons is gonna take him before too long, we can always get starlight again when it comes up

estrus
>>88245947

Thanks for clarifying. I didn't even notice it was the imho inferior skimpy version.