Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

Update: Thank you everyone for your feedback, 5 slots barely won for a coupe of votes, the slots being selected at random also sounds interesting, I think we can compromise and get a middle point, need to ask you if you approve of somechanges on an upcoming poll.

Would you preffer "New slot posts" to be when 5 slots are available instead of 3, even if that means a longer wait between reservation posts?

Comments

NettFox

Definitely 3 slots.

T-Danger

I feel the issue isn't the number or available slots, its that only the people with the quickest internet connection get first dibs. If you don't refresh the page quick enough to see the sign up post, you have no chance. Maybe future commissions could be decided by a raffle, to give everyone a fair shot?

MatsuoTanuki

Or split the difference between the two: five slots open at the end of every list, with three being a first come first served basis, while two are automatically given to the runners up from the last selection

Orm

I feel like the number of how many wouldn't really matter. I would say that some sort of honor system should be implemented, so that someone who got a slot previously, or just had one done, should refrain from claiming one, or wait longer as to give other people a chance.

Flaw

I really do NOT like the idea of the slots being given off at random.

Mav_Art

I'm going to suggest 4 slots, first 2 slots to Patrons who reply faster, then 2 slots given at random to Patrons who reply late.