Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Content

A very close inspection of her logs showed that none of my fears or the fears of many a science fiction movie were likely to occur with the laws and restrictions I built into them. With a healthy amount of fear in my heart, I had both modified and gone beyond Asimov’s 3 laws. Instead of humanity, their focus would be on my welfare and survival and those I cared about, but including a core component which emphasized empowering me and preserving my agency as a fundamental concern. There would be no creative interpretation of the laws in such a way that they kept me in stasis as a prisoner in a misguided effort to protect me from everyone and everything, for example. And in the event that they did go off the rails, I had built in inviolable safeguards that I could assert in various ways, everything from temporarily shutting them down, to direct control, to outright permanent deletion/termination.

Files

Previews only

Asimov's Laws Won't Stop Robots from Harming Humans, So We've Developed a Better Solution

The following essay is reprinted with permission from The Conversation, an online publication covering the latest research. How do you stop a robot from hurting people? Many existing robots, such as those assembling cars in factories, shut down immediately when a human comes near.

Comments

No comments found for this post.