Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Poll

$200 Change (?)

  • Back to Original 82
  • Stay the same 195
  • 2024-04-03
  • 277 votes
{'title': '$200 Change (?)', 'choices': [{'text': 'Back to Original', 'votes': 82}, {'text': 'Stay the same', 'votes': 195}], 'closes_at': None, 'created_at': datetime.datetime(2024, 4, 3, 6, 39, 33, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc), 'description': None, 'allow_multiple': False, 'total_votes': 277}

Content

We’re at a point where I think my team is able to deliver reward on time by the end of the month now. Would you guys rather we change the $200 back to the original 3 pages or stay the way it is. Lemme know which one you guys enjoy more and prefer to do.

Comments

Star Journeyfriend

If it went back to original would we be allowed to pay for a longer sequence over multiple months? Like 400 for 6 pages over 2 months? 🤔

MeowWithMe

We are not doing combined monthly. That would be considered a commission. Everyone should receive their reward in a similar format or else it wont feel fair.

FarEasternMyth

I'm OK with it staying at 4 pages over 2 months. It gives a little more space to tell a story, which I prefer more than rushing through transformation requests. Would there be collaboration options for $200 patrons still? Or is that like the combination rewards in that it might not be fair to the other patrons?

Prince-Imperial

I would prefer going back to the original method, I think that worked best

Max Leibowitz

Why do you call it a reward exactly?