Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Content

We're wrapping up our reading of Part Three, discussing everything from the Apollonian -Dionysian duality of aesthetics, Anna's existential crisis, how to gain perspective during difficult times, marriage, sublimation, utopia, and dramatic deathbed dialogues.

Below the timestamps, I will offer you some interesting questions to consider as we dive into Part Four (which is going to involve some psychologically robust discussions on ideas of face, sin, and divorce laws).

  • 0:00 Anna/Levin and meaning 
  • 0:40 what problems are we dealing with? 
  • 1:10 losing one’s sense of meaning  
  • 1:30 what’s the ultimate art form? 
  • 2:20 literature vs painting vs music  
  • 3:05 the Apollonian-Dionysian duality of aesthetics 
  • 4:30 Anna’s existential crisis  
  • 6:00 Anna and her son  
  • 7:30 how to generate conflict in fiction  
  • 8:00 why we can sympathise with Anna  
  • 9:30 “Do you love me?” 
  • 12:20 “God has made me so I must love and live.” 
  • 13:00 “Was any woman as unhappy as I am?” 
  • 14:00 Vronsky and the complexity of other people 
  • 14:50 “How I wish I knew others as I know myself.” 
  • 15:45 Perspective, the sublime, and difficult times 
  • 16:25 if we are small, so are our problems  
  • 19:30 Vronsky’s code of rules  
  • 21:00 why we might sympathise with Vronsky  
  • 23:30 marriage and sublimation  
  • 24:30 for most of history, love was weird  
  • 26:00 Levin and Nikolai’s deathbed  
  • 27:20 the art of irony (and lying as human nature) 
  • 28:30 a discussion on death  
  • 31:40 what is utopia? 
  • 33:00 “You don’t want to set up anything. You simply want to be original.” 
  • 34:30 “You only want to coddle your own vanity.” 
  • 35:10 the end of Part Three

Questions for you:

1) If Anna Karenina did not exist as a novel, but was instead an opera or a series of paintings, how would your impression, appreciation, and understanding of the characters, world, and story change?

2) What do you feel is the ultimate art form? Or, at least, what is your favourite? Why?

3) Have you ever struggled with a sense of meaning?

Files

Previews only

Deep Analysis of Anna Karenina Part Three: Anna's Existential Crisis (Chapters 15-32)

0:00 Anna/Levin and meaning 0:40 what problems are we dealing with? 1:10 losing one’s sense of meaning 1:30 what’s the ultimate art form? 2:20 literature vs painting vs music 3:05 the Apollonian-Dionysian duality of aesthetics 4:30 Anna’s existential crisis 6:00 Anna and her son 7:30 how to generate conflict in fiction 8:00 why we can sympathise with Anna 9:30 “Do you love me?” 12:20 “God has made me so I must love and live.” 13:00 “Was any woman as unhappy as I am?” 14:00 Vronsky and the complexity of other people 14:50 “How I wish I knew others as I know myself.” 15:45 Perspective, the sublime, and difficult times 16:25 if we are small, so are our problems 19:30 Vronsky’s code of rules 21:00 why we might sympathise with Vronsky 23:30 marriage and sublimation 24:30 for most of history, love was weird 26:00 Levin and Nikolai’s deathbed 27:20 the art of irony (and lying as human nature) 28:30 a discussion on death 31:40 what is utopia? 33:00 “You don’t want to set up anything. You simply want to be original.” 34:30 “You only want to coddle your own vanity.” 35:10 the end of Part Three

Comments

Lindsey Chastain

It strikes me that in every aspect of Anna so far, she has defined herself through connection to someone else - a wife, a lover, and son. I’m curious to see how this will unravel, because I’m certain it will.

Janette Wilson

I so enjoyed Sharons posts. Found this lecture the most resonant so far. Meditating on the sudden death of my husband....had a strange sense of being a speck in time and my city. Wth that came a power as I walked in isolation on a busy street. I am "my own", I have a profound knowledge that I had not possessed before and that gave me power.....For Anna that conflict between the 3 of her lives I can not imagine whether I would leap or remain. It reinforces, much as we try, with good intention, the futility of advising people on a course of action......I was confused with what appeared to be a change of philosophy in Levin's two interchanges with his brother. Maybe I did not take in the transition from his original stance of keeping the workers ignorant without education to later a more benign attitude in introducing the share farm....then there is the attitude of the workers who were critical of him working beside them....he seems a truly complex person and I do see the comparison between his wavering between convictions and Anna's perplexity . Tolstoy certainly knows how to paint characters. No wonder the book is so vast.I was in a discussion group where I told them of this course, someone said "what is AK about" ...how do you tell what it is about in a sentence or two? "Married woman has an affair"!!!!!!! So enjoying it