Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Content

As we mentioned in the first book battle, one of the most exciting parts of embarking upon a lifelong reading plan is sharpening your ability to weigh and compare authors.

When you finish a book, ask yourself:

  • Who is this writer better than?
  • Who do they fall short of?

You're meeting many great writers on your journey, collecting wisdom and insights into the human condition, learning about the world, other people, and yourself.

In the first video, we pitted Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky against each other, grading them on the following four aesthetic dimensions:

1) Characterisation

2) Pacing

3) Language/voice

4) Theme

In this video, we're adding Jane Austen into the mix and throwing some bonus criteria on top:

5) Metaphor/allegory

6) Wisdom/prophecy 

Play along at home and score them with me.

Let's compare notes.

There are no right or wrong answers. It all comes down to your personal taste.

Timestamps:

  • 0:00 why should we compare our writers?
  • 1:30 the objective criteria of this subjective art
  • 3:00 discussing the kindred spirit poll 
  • 4:45 ranking reread-ability 
  • 5:00 characterisation: Austen vs Tolstoy vs Dostoyevsky 
  • 8:00 which world would you prefer to live in?
  • 9:00 pacing: Austen vs Tolstoy vs Dostoyevsky
  • 10:50 language: Austen vs Tolstoy vs Dostoyevsky
  • 11:15 reading the Russians in translation
  • 12:14 theme: Austen vs Tolstoy vs Dostoyevsky
  • 12:38 which novel is most relevant to your life?
  • 13:12 who is the best craftsman of metaphor?
  • 14:00 the wounds of great writers
  • 14:50 who is the best human?
  • 16:00 Austen's lost love 
  • 17:30 preaching/sermonising as an art form
  • 18:20 which writer is my kindred spirit?
  • 20:00 which book is most reread-able?
  • 21:26 can you rank these (or other) authors?

Share your scoring below!

Files

Previews only

Who is the Better Writer: Austen, Tolstoy, or Dostoyevsky? (Book Battle II)

0:00 why should we compare our writers? 1:30 the objective criteria of this subjective art 3:00 discussing the kindred spirit poll 4:45 ranking reread-ability 5:00 characterisation: Austen vs Tolstoy vs Dostoyevsky 8:00 which world would you prefer to live in? 9:00 pacing: Austen vs Tolstoy vs Dostoyevsky 10:50 language: Austen vs Tolstoy vs Dostoyevsky 11:15 reading the Russians in translation 12:14 theme: Austen vs Tolstoy vs Dostoyevsky 12:38 which novel is most relevant to your life? 13:12 who is the best craftsman of metaphor? 14:00 the wounds of great writers 14:50 who is the best human? 16:00 Austen's lost love 17:30 preaching/sermonising as an art form 18:20 which writer is my kindred spirit? 20:00 which book is most reread-able? 21:26 can you rank these (or other) authors?

Comments

John Starliper

Ben breaks out the “Austen is Pisces like myself….” Oh, no! That caught be by surprise. Lol. :)

Anna Breslavskaya

I've never done such comparisons before, but I love the idea and I'll try to pit three books of my choice against each other. I haven't read the novels you're talking about, apart from Crime and Punishment a long time ago, so I'll make an attempt to compare The Heart of the Matter by Grahan Greene, the Black Prince by Iris Murdoch and Brave New World by Aldous Huxley. Characterisation - The heart of the matter The main character, Scobie, is so well fleshed out that I, despite finding his moral dilemma completely alien, could understand and feel for him. In the Black Prince, the main character seems to fill all the space. All the other characters are shown from his perspective, and somehow they fall flat, 'cos the narrator is too obsessed with himself and his own emotions. In the BNW, all the characters serve to represent ideas, so there’s not much in terms of character development. Pacing - BNW BNW is action-driven unlike the other two novels where self-reflection comes to the fore, and the actual events are sparse. Language - The Black Prince. Iris Murdoch’s language is exquisite. I like her dense sentences filled with meaning and metaphor, although it does get too flowery at times. Theme - The heart of the matter. In my view, this novel is about a man's struggle with contradictions between religious morals and truths of reality, between an ingrained feeling of duty towards others and personal happiness. These are eternal questions that'll not cease to preoccupy us. I'll leave the wisdom criteria for later. I feel unable to judge that for now:)

hardcoreliterature

Beautiful. Thank you so much for doing this experiment, and for offering us some new novels. One might say we're living more in Huxley's future than Orwell's of late. I've always wanted to get into Iris Murdoch - I have her 'The Sea, The Sea', but have yet to read it. I may pick up 'The Black Prince' if you recommend it :) I see Hamlet was an influence!