Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Downloads

  • How to Read a Book Lecture One.mp3

Missing 1 full-res photo, 1 file, as this post has not yet been imported.

Content

Today we're breaking down Mortimer Adler's instructive and insightful guide for deep reading - How to Read a Book.

In this first lecture, we will be covering the four levels of reading, coming to terms with an author, pigeonholing books, immersion and unity, questions demanding readers must ask, agreeing and disagreeing with authors, and much more.

You can listen to the audio without having read the book, but if you would like a copy of your own I recommend the revised edition of this classic:

We have topic timestamps below, so feel free to jump to any part that most interests you.

Audio Timestamps

  • 0:00 ‘How to Read a Book’ by Mortimer Adler
  • 2:00 primary vs secondary reading
  • 3:00 the Oxford University workload
  • 5:00 rules for non-fiction vs imaginative literature
  • 6:45 reading “over one’s head”
  • 9:58 the four levels of reading
  • 11:00 the Great Books of the Western World
  • 13:00 informed vs enlightened
  • 13:45 the Feynman Technique
  • 14:30 an exercise for improving your retention
  • 17:00 learning to read our books well
  • 18:30 how Oxford filtered applicants out
  • 20:00 aided/facilitated discovery
  • 22:30 questions demanding readers must ask
  • 27:00 elementary reading (level one)
  • 27:30 inspectional reading (level two)
  • 28:00 systematic skimming
  • 30:00 analytical reading (level three)
  • 32:00 syntopical reading (level four)
  • 33:00 how to write a good thesis
  • 36:00 the habit of skimming/pre-reading
  • 37:00 Daniel Defoe and Cormac McCarthy
  • 41:00 how to read a university textbook
  • 41:45 how to conduct a superficial reading
  • 42:20 reading a Shakespeare play with immersion
  • 44:00 reading in a single sitting
  • 46:00 different reading paces (and speed-reading)
  • 48:00 reading the Declaration of Independence
  • 49:00 the importance of defining your terms
  • 49:45 the different kinds of note-taking
  • 52:00 Aristotle on habits
  • 54:00 analytical reading and classifying our books
  • 57:00 an orienting question for book reviews
  • 1:00:00 the problems with pigeonholing books
  • 1:03:00 making the poetic practical
  • 1:04:00 how to x-ray a book
  • 1:04:30 how to state the unity of a book
  • 1:07:00 unity reading exercise
  • 1:10:00 telling the same story in different ways
  • 1:12:00 discovering the author’s intentions
  • 1:15:00 being part of the greatest conversation
  • 1:16:00 pausing upon difficult terms
  • 1:17:00 agreeing or disagreeing with an author
  • 1:18:00 latent vs manifest meaning
  • 1:19:00 abandoning books due to disagreement
  • 1:20:00 how to read imaginative literature

Questions for You

1) What has been your experience with reading poems, short stories, and plays? How do you typically read them?

2) Which of the techniques covered thus far are you most keen to put into practice? And what book will you try them on?

Happy reading, everybody!  

Files

Previews only

Comments

Bulkington

Greetings Nigel my man! Thank you so much for slogging through my long winded comments annd reflections about Adler. I feel almost bipolar because I don’t clearly remember much about his book anymore! And I can’t believe I spent so much time writing my reflections down a couple of months ago. And you read what I wrote. Thank you. I feel like a minor celebrity. I only hope i don't become even more boring and egotistical than Springsteen on Broadway. Lol. I’m surprised. At the time, I had thought Adler would have had a bigger impact on me over time, but I already went ahead and filed his advice away !!! and essentially disregarded him I guess! I didn’t even realize I did that until I read your comments that just came into my email … it all came back to me. I guess when it comes right down to it the main thing I learned from Adler is that no one can teach me how to change if I don’t want to change. So Virginia Wolfe was right! Right now I’m listening with my ears to one translation of the Tale of Genji whilst I am reading with my eyes a different translation. It reminds me of the Chinese, the Story of the Stone Slow moving patterns. Genji the ladies man reminds me of my father. Like you say you have to decide which books you go deep with because you can’t read them all I’ve invested a lot of time so far and I’m seeing a pattern about a lack of true intimacy. I’m hoping that Genji matures in the next 700 pages (my father never grew up. He was a puer to the end). Peace!

seagoj

Did Lecture II ever happen for this?

Sybil LeBer

I love reading poetry but have always had trouble getting to the meaning of many of them. I read through the poem several times, then I try to journal what it is trying to say. Then I go into deep dive mode and look up the poet's lives, if I don't already know much about them. Finally, I look at what the learned types say about the work. I'm usually way off! However, my goal is to find out what the work I've chosen means to me. I recently tried this with a poem by Langston Hughes called Black Maria. I read the poem thinking that it was from the viewpoint of a dying man. I was so far off but got so much out of it when my research opened my eyes. I do wish I was better at seeing the meaning from the start, however. I know that the poets I choose to read are from entirely different times and walks of life from me, so I'm not beating myself up too much but I'd really feel accomplished if I could dig right in and know what I was looking at.

Erik Bajzert

I want to chime in late! This podcast is fascinating, primarily because I find it both applicable and reflective of other mediums and disciplines. You’ve alluded to how Adler’s rules can be applicable to writing- fiction and non fiction. I’m working on a screenplay right now that I’ve been struggling with and I’m finding myself asking the questions of what I want to say, how I want to say it, if I believe in its truth and why. I believe that these questions can be extremely helpful in the development of themes and narrative, so I want to thank you for exploring them in such a compelling, comprehensive fashion. Additionally, I admire the use of these rules in mediums outside of literature. I went to the movies last night, after listening to the podcast. Given my recent exposure to Adler, I found myself reflecting on the film with these criteria and my walk home- in snowy Toronto weather- was way more nourishing and interesting, as I gave myself plenty of time to slowly “mull”over what I saw. I’m still mulling and I don’t intend to stop any time soon. Thanks for such an enlightening podcast!