Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Content

Ulysses was at the heart of one of the most famous obscenity trials of all time.

After years of censorship battles, the right to sell and posses a copy of James Joyce’s masterpiece was won.

But it prompts the question:

Should a book ever been censored, banned or burned?

Video Timestamps:

  • 0:00 where they burn books…
  • 1:30 the irony of banning books
  • 2:00 Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451
  • 3:40 Milton’s Aereopagitica
  • 4:50 who will watch the watchers?
  • 6:00 why do people burn books?
  • 9:50 Ulysses as censorship case study
  • 13:00 The Most Dangerous Book
  • 15:00 those who fought for Ulysses
  • 16:00 censorship in the early 20th Century
  • 18:00 why was Ulysses targeted?
  • 19:00 The Little Review trial
  • 21:00 smuggling Ulysses
  • 24:00 the Random House trial
  • 27:00 Ulysses becomes legal in the US
  • 28:40 should a book ever be banned?

Discussion:

1) Do you think it's ever justified to censor, ban, or outright burn a book? And why, or why not? 

2) What has been your experience with reading banned books? Was it clear why they were banned? And would you recommend any?

Happy reading, everybody!

Files

Previews only

Should a Book Ever Be Banned, Censored or Burned?

0:00 where they burn books… 1:30 the irony of banning books 2:00 Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 3:40 Milton’s Aereopagitica 4:50 who will watch the watchers? 6:00 why do people burn books? 9:50 Ulysses as censorship case study 13:00 The Most Dangerous Book 15:00 those who fought for Ulysses 16:00 censorship in the early 20th Century 18:00 why was Ulysses targeted? 19:00 The Little Review trial 21:00 smuggling Ulysses 24:00 the Random House trial 27:00 Ulysses becomes legal in the US 28:40 should a book ever be banned?

Comments

David Holmes

I just finished Fahrenheit 451 yesterday before seeing this post. Should books be banned or censored? No. I have consulted numerous banned books lists and been delighted to learned that many books I have read and loved were banned or are banned. Various “do-gooders” will always find reasons to ban books, but books will find publishers, and publishers, or drafts, will find readers.

Daphna Kedmi

Aghast at the attack on Salman Rushdie yesterday, it seems that we are up against a phenomenon much more dangerous than state sanctioned censorship. The terror imposed on authors today who are seen as offensive by one group or another, could create a self-imposed censorship. When the state imposes censorship there is a clear target to battle. When an author decides not to publish because he is being terrorized, nothing can be done. I wonder if in hindsight, after the years of hiding, of fearing for his life and, ultimately, being violently attacked when it seemed there was nothing to fear anymore, Rushdie would have published "The Satanic Verses," that one book that was so detrimental to his personal life.

Ellen M

‘The moment you declare a set of ideas to be immune from criticism, satire, derision or contempt, freedom of thought becomes impossible’ -Salmon Rushdie