Home
Creators
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register Favorites Keys Review DMs Logout
Community
Telegram ThePornDude
Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

More explicit? (Patreon)

Published:
2019-04-16 12:35:51
Imported:
2026-06

Poll

More explicit?

  • No, your art is fine the way it is. 4
  • Yes. 13
  • 2019-04-16
  • —2019-04-18
  • 17 votes
{'title': 'More explicit?', 'choices': [{'text': 'No, your art is fine the way it is.', 'votes': 4}, {'text': 'Yes.', 'votes': 13}], 'closes_at': datetime.datetime(2019, 4, 18, 12, 35, 15, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc), 'created_at': datetime.datetime(2019, 4, 16, 12, 35, 51, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc), 'description': None, 'allow_multiple': False, 'total_votes': 17}

Content

Would you like to see more explicit bondage art?

Comments

Doctor Dweeb

Might sound like a stupid question but what do you mean by "more explicit"?

rook07
>>21820632

Anything from more nudity to full on sex. Just trying to get a feel of what you guys want.

BedBugsBites

First i like to say that you are doing just fine as you do now & i think most people are here for the "knotty bondage". That being said i dont mind mixing things up a bit with like light to heavy Bdsm, dom/slave, sex, male/fem on male/fem, fetish, ponygirl, catgirl. lots of toys or just "normal bondage" like you did a picture of a few month ago. All fine with me as long as we stay clear of the "sick extreme" stuff (gore, cannibalism etc).

Thos. Merchant

There's nothing wrong with what you're doing now. But if you're thinking of doing more nudity, more of the ol' in-'n'-out (Say no more! Say no more!), I would not mind.

Mark Schepmoes

Sadly I wasn't able to vote since the poll ended before I received an email saying it was there. But I most definitely vote for more explicit stuff. The web is getting too tame these days.

rook07
>>21823699

Right on! Yeah, no snuff stuff. I was thinking more nudity, sex, implied peril, that kind of stuff.

rook07
>>21899941

Right on, well you agree with a lot of others. So I just might do that.