Home
Creators
Search Recent Missing Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register Favorites Keys Review DMs Logout
Community
Telegram ThePornDude
Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Stefan Molyneux: BUSTED (Patreon)

Published:
2014-10-04 17:55:07
Imported:
2026-06
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Content

Stefan Molyneux busted.... and then some. Crazy can come in all shapes and sizes, but when it's advising people to shun/disconnect/defoo from their families because they don't agree with his rather narrow 'anarchist' beliefs...-that's messed up. If we were discussing if more laws or less would be better, then we can have a sensible discussion. However this man is advocating that we should have no laws!! The amazing thing is, 'Stefan Molyneux: BUSTED' shows in black and white terms just how effortlessly and seamlessly Stefan Molyneux will lie to promote his ideology..... and his fans just will not acknowledge his outrageous dishonesty. Many thanks to all of you who support this channel through Patreon!

Files

Previews only

Stefan Molyneux: BUSTED

Yup, they guy is dishonest to where it simply beggars belief! Molyneux Wife gets reprimanded for professional misconduct (including advocating defooing) https://members.cpo.on.ca/public_register/show/19048?section=discipline#ui-tabs-12 Stefan Molyneux lies to Joe Rogans face https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnbR_j12JXk&t=1h27m15s Stefan Molyneux thinks that if you think he should pay taxes, you want him shot, and that you should disown those people.

Comments

Niclas Hedhman

Thunderf00t, I think you have crossed the line of misrepresentation and propaganda. I am sure I am not alone in following you both, and although I dislike many of Stefan's tactics, hyperbole and trying to hammering home a point, YOUR portrayal of him is genuinely false. I expected more from you. Instead of Busting Stefan (he does that himself), I think you have Busted Yourself. I am withdrawing my patronage, until a time when you have regained the respect you once had. Stick to Science and Atheism, not personal vendettas.

Anonymous

Not one of my favourite videos, all the repetition sure got your point across, but I got really tired of it too. Feedback from me is that if I see a video that is 30 minutes long then I'm a lot less likely to watch it (the main reason I could never sit through a Molyneux video). I used to like it when you kept yours to around 10 minutes. One other note; people do lie sometimes. It doesn't necessary mean that they get to carry the label 'liar' around forever. No doubt Molyneaux lied, you proved that pretty clearly, but does he do it all the time, or was this a weakness something to do with his wife being involved..? Thanks, Richard

Trigger
>>183333

Yet another individual that doesn't understand that science is not an area of study. Sadly typical in this crowd, for some reason. Science is a truth-finder. It's a framework. Just because chemicals and physical laws aren't involved doesn't mean it's not scientific.

Anonymous

If we were discussing if more laws or less would be better, then we can have a sensible discussion. However this man is advocating that we should have no laws!!" no thunderf00t, you clearly have no authority on the subject, you have never actually listened to the arguments stefan has made and in this statement discredited yourself from being a reliable source on the matter. You more than likely heard he's an anarchist and said "an anarchist? how preposterous!? well surely there's something wrong there, lets try to find something wrong with him in effort to discredit him". So from this simple one line i can tell you, and hopefully anyone he sees this comment, you do NOT know what you're talking about. You have no authority on the subject and you have certainly not taken a scientific approach to the subject at hand. You clearly went into it with the assumption that he was an anarchist and anarchist =eww and therefore your conclusions may be dismissed as bias. i have addressed some of the other things you have said in other comments but i just came across this quote on my way out and i felt compelled to make this clear. STEFAN, DOES NOT ADVOCATE FOR NO LAWS. he advocates for no GOVERMENT. government =/= law. therefore your logic is as follows >government creates law >anarchists don't want government >stefan is an anarchist >>>therefore stefan molyneux does not want law this is faulty because it relies on a false assumption that only governments can create law. He even goes into great depth proposing how laws could be made and enforced without a government. So you are wrong, your logic gets a F- and you are not a reliable source on the subject. Stick to critiquing feminists and nuclear alarmists please.