Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Content

The hype on the hyperloop drives me crazy.  No one seems interested in actually looking at what they have, or what they might be able to do, but rather what they promise.... 700 mph.... LA to SF in 30 mins! 1/10th the cost of high speed rail!!

The fact that this is all hopelessly optimistic doesnt seem to bother anyone.  The fact that these engineering geniuses paid over 10 million dollars on a steel tube, but forgot that it would get rusty when wet doesnt seem bother anyone.... the fact that the idea is nothing new... its just a new name for an old idea doesnt seem to bother anyone 'LA TO SF IN 30 MINS!!!!!'

Meanwhile when you actually get there and take a look at what they have, none of it even remotely starts to address any of the technical challenges of actually building a functioning hyperloop, let alone making it commercially viable!!

Files

Previews only

Thunderf00t at the 12 million dollar HYPERLOOP!

If your gonna shell out 12 million dollars for a tube..... check whether it will RUST first! The hyperloop is less than a year old, and its rusting everywhere on the outside. On the inside its completely covered with rust. There arent many ways you can actually screw up a vacuum tube, but not only is the inside of the hyperloop completely rusted up, they also managed to paint over the o-rings in the viewing port. I actually also had a chat with one of the hyperloop engineers. To be fair he only worked on the pusher, but he had never really thought about the viability of the project as a whole. He was a nice guy and let me have quite a poke around on the pusher and tube. Nonetheless he hadnt even considered the expansion issue. For me when I got the thermal camera inside the tube... I took one look and 'QED' when I saw the temperature differential between the top and bottom of the tube. He just had a blank expression of 'so what?' What they did get right is the thickness of the tube. The walls are about 2-3cm thick (~1inch). It would make a convincing gun barrel, and feels like it would contain anything that went wrong in the tube. The exception in the end of the tube. There Im not so sure. Many thanks to all those who supported this video through patreon. https://www.patreon.com/Thunderf00t

Comments

Anonymous

Lol. I'll admit I watched the solar roadway one and it was awesome. Then I saw your vid on it and I got pretty depressed:( oh well. Ty for all of these, dude.

Anonymous

It would be great IF it was feasible. Unfortunately, not. We need to build the damn high speed rail systems that we already KNOW work instead of waiting for unicorn solutions. It's time to apply practical, proven engineering. Enough of this imaginary bullshit being peddled by hucksters and suckers.

Anonymous

If we could just Dig up Gene Roddenberry and get his schematics for the Transporter, we could stop chasing fantasies.

Anonymous

The 1st NYC subway was pneumatic. As a Musk stockholder, why would I think getting to LA n 1/2 hr matters? Why would I take my family into a sealed tube 400 miles long with no exits. The BART under Bay tube is crazy enough. People aren't leaders to follow just because they have 1 or 2 ideas that work out.

Anonymous

@Phil Not directly related to this video - we have a crisis brewing in New Mexico in which some retard Acting Public Education Secretary is proposing a change in science standards to follow the other third-world (US) states in removing Evolution and teaching that Climate Change is just normal changes in energy flow... There is a public hearing in Santa Fe on 16 October, which I will attend, but your help would be greatly appreciated in producing some good ridicule material to get more attention to it. See <a href="https://www.abqjournal.com/1064653/whose-science-excerpt-critics-say-proposed-nm-science-standards-omit-evolution-climate-change.html." rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://www.abqjournal.com/1064653/whose-science-excerpt-critics-say-proposed-nm-science-standards-omit-evolution-climate-change.html.</a>

Anonymous

... To follow on, the argument is that it “reflects the diversity of perspectives” in New Mexico. The whole point of education is to REMOVE diversity when the diversity of opinion is incorrect. Should we change the Math curriculum because a third of New Mexicans think Pi is 22/7? It would reflect their “diversity”?

Anonymous

At least they're not pissing it away on improving how we kill one another.