Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Content

Oddly enough, yeah, in an even fight, they guy who understands the mathematics wins! Its about half of Lanchesters Law.... the other half has to do with efficiency. Oddly enough the equation you end up with applicable to almost all walks of life, from economics, to politics, warfare, and even the flux of ideas on the internet! MANY thanks for your support! Phil

Files

Previews only

Can you win a war through MATH!?

Turns out, if you are in a perfectly fair fight, the side that understands a simple piece of mathematics will annihilate the other. Also, it turns out in a war where the ability of fighting machines determines who has the stronger side, that depriving those enemy fighting machines of their supplies is a far better way of neutralizing the enemy force than actually trying to fight their war machines!

Comments

Adam Foreman

In RTS games, I've learned to use this strategy.

Anonymous

Same for me. But I never research if the same works in real life. I always saw RTS as "sperical cows" in comparison to a real conflict.

Theo Cookson

Before watching this video I'm going to answer yes. Taking into consideration that it really means the more mathematically minded side is better off. I feel that goes without saying. War is a very mathematical process and those thinking strategically are thinking mathematically. So I'm saying yes. Play.

Fair Use

Feminists cuts off your supply line by threatening your livelihood, job, or freedom. They mass their forces on college campuses and atheist conventions (cutting off a nation's intellectual discourse at the source of academics and intellectuals), mounts blitzkrieg assaults against dissent groups, plays victim to enlist campus security. Deprived of a free marketplace of ideas, peer pressure keeps the masses quiet and keeps them in line. The useful idiots of feminism are mindless, but their coordination shouldn't be underestimated.