Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Content

 The first of the Pentagon confirmed ‘UFO’ turned out to be a bird, or similar. Surely the second would turn out to knock it outta the park. 

Well to be honest, when I watched this for the first time I just couldn’t believe it. ‘What… that’s all?’

What stunning though is just how many ‘discovery channel’, ‘History channel’ type programs can spin out a gimballed camera losing tracking for about half a second as an ‘amazing proof’ that we are not alone.  A lot of it is padding from 'eye witnesses' who report the most incredible things, that were curiously never captured on camera- how very VERY convenient!

Files

Previews only

US Navy CONFIRMED UFO: BUSTED (Part 2)

You can support this channel directly through patreon: https://patreon.com/Thunderf00t or at my amazon affiliate store: https://www.amazon.com/shop/thunderf00t or my other channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCUrdmVprSahXaPKqr04VfgQ

Comments

Anonymous

Hype, suspension, and conspicuous recreations are the only things at the disposal for these "based on real events" and "based on a true story" productions. Critique of these things is easy, but gullibility is what they always aim for. It's usually not so apparent to such viewers, but nonetheless captivates them into either believing it, or simply retelling it to maintain the glorious wonder. It's unfortunate, though, when given the answers, even when made as simple as can be, there isn't always a firm establishment for implementing doubt as an appropriate perspective on it. Freedom has it's price, and too much much freedom can have an underwhelming and chronic side-effect. So long as there is under-education, America will always be paying for that consequence.

spacediver

I'm pretty sure the footage you analyze is not from David Fravor's encounter, so it doesn't make sense to point out contradictions between his account and the infra red footage. The infra red footage was taken a while later by a Chad Underwood who flew out after Fravor returned. This is described in the wiki: "After the return of the first team to Nimitz, a second crew took off at approximately 12:00 PST, this time equipped with an advanced infrared camera (FLIR pod). This camera recorded what appeared to be a moving object. " Fravor's appearance on the Rogan podcast gives some useful context behind the entire event. It's also worth noting that Fravor has serious reservations about the nimitz documentary video that was put out on youtube (and from which I think you drew source material from in your video). Fravor may have made some serious cognitive/perceptual errors that affected his experience and recollection of the event, and the phenomenon may well be something far more mundane, but his credibility has always seemed solid to me, and your implication that his credibility is suspect is based on the wrong evidence.

Anonymous

>Fravor may have made some serious cognitive/perceptual errors >his credibility has always seemed solid to me So, on one hand, he's not credible; on the other, he is. Seems legit.

Eric Sage

I like that Tucker Carlson was included in this video. He said “This feels like a really big story to me. It’s not exactly clear why people find Vladimir Putin more interesting than this.” That says a lot about Tucker’s audience.

Anonymous

When I was at university I got a book called "The Bermuda Triangle Mystery Solved" from Amazon. There was a guy in my class who was into the whole Bermuda Triangle business. I gave him the book which concluded that the only mystery was that all the dummies putting out in small boats without any knowledge of navigation from Florida didn't take more casualties. I never got the book back and he never spoke to me again. I destroyed his religion. He was just like all the other religious:- gullible and stupid.