Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

Cardano Hydra's claim of 1 million transactions per second (TPS) is misleading for several reasons:

  • Hydra is a Layer 2 solution, not part of Cardano's main blockchain. It operates separately from the main Cardano network.

  • The 1 million TPS was achieved in a controlled test environment, not in real-world conditions.

  • Hydra Heads are not decentralized like the main Cardano blockchain. They function more like centralized systems, which can process transactions faster but sacrifice some of blockchain's core principles.

  • Transactions processed in Hydra Heads are not immediately settled on the main Cardano blockchain. Instead, only a summary of the transactions is eventually recorded on the main chain.

  • The high TPS number doesn't reflect actual blockchain performance, as it doesn't account for the limitations of settling these transactions on the main Cardano network.

In essence, while Hydra can process many transactions quickly in its own environment, it doesn't solve the fundamental scalability issues of the main Cardano blockchain. The hype around the 1 million TPS figure is misleading because it doesn't represent real-world blockchain performance or true decentralized operation.

PS SOL Firedancer does 1.2M TPS and it is going wide soon.

Final note you can have all the speed in the world, but if you have no adoption, it doesn't matter.

Comments

CCat

What do we think of Kusama claiming over 100,000 TPS?

Horsegal33

Thanks for the brutal honesty James! It's what we admire about you- we know you have no bones to pick with loser stocks, cryptos, or whatever....you are just trying to keep us safe! Thanks for sharing your wisdom and models!!

ogmgp

Thanks for clarifying

$amo

Alex McShitky!! Of Celcius took all my ADA 😁 The tech is pretty cool, early days yet, I would love to see the mainnet get tested with 1m TSP. All blockchains should be tested

Rob Lentowich

Better thing to look at is how.much the transactions fees are and ease and simplicity of use. If the tests are wallet to wallet that's garbage as a lot of chains have been able to achieve a high TPS just using wallets. I'm super skeptical but I could be wrong. We shall see.

JLR CARPA

I’ve noticed a lot of ADA supporters trying extremely hard to not use the term “layer 2” when talking about hydra.

DcM

No one cares about fundamentals during a bull cycle

Mostly Harmless

I can see more reason for Layer 2 solutions for a Legacy chain like Eth which is so big but why needed for Cardano which does nothing of consequence? Seems silly!