Home
Creators
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register Favorites Keys Review DMs Logout
Community
Telegram ThePornDude
Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Huge MSTR BTC Buy (Patreon)

Published:
2025-03-31 13:29:25
Imported:
2026-06
Tags:
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Content

$MSTR has acquired 22,048 BTC for ~$1.92 billion at ~$86,969 per bitcoin and has achieved BTC Yield of 11.0% YTD 2025. As of 3/30/2025, MSTR now holds 528,185 $BTC acquired for ~$35.63 billion at ~$67,458 per bitcoin.

Specific details on the exact amount of MSTR, STRK, or STRF sold directly for the 22,048 BTC purchase on March 30, 2025, are not disclosed in the provided data.

Nav Prem 1.71

MSTR and BTC are holding up very well during this very weak market.

Maybe Flight to safety narrative for BTC is here at last.

 

Files

Previews only

Comments

Swinginit3

Is this not a red flag? When we look at tokenomics of a crypto we look at circulating supply, how many wallets hold the coin and how much of the supply, what the unlock schedule is etc. When looking at BTC and you see a wallet holder holding so many BTC would that not put investors off buying? When you aren't guaranteed to know what that individual wallet could potentially do?

Paul O

Man, some of these takes need to go back to Bitcoin 101. You’re saying “he’s buying all the Bitcoin” like that’s even possible in a decentralized system with 21 million total supply and global access. Plus, the irony here? A lot of these same people will say, “We need the SEC to control it,” while in the same breath worrying about centralization. That’s an oxymoron they don’t even hear themselves saying. Bitcoin isn’t controlled by Saylor, BlackRock, or the SEC. It’s a mathematical protocol—transparent, borderless, and resistant to capture. The more people try to centralize it, the more obvious its decentralized defense mechanisms become. As Satoshi said: "It might make sense just to get some in case it catches on." Spoiler alert: it caught on.

Paul O
>>169497423

You're applying altcoin tokenomics logic to Bitcoin, which is a completely different beast. BTC doesn’t have shady unlock schedules, stealth VC allocations, or surprise supply inflation. It’s got fixed supply, transparent issuance, and verifiable rules. Worried about a wallet holding too much? Welcome to a free market. Anyone can buy as much Bitcoin as they want—there are no pre-mines or insider deals. That’s not a red flag, that’s a feature. And unlike sketchy projects where you have no idea who controls supply, Bitcoin is on-chain, auditable, and known. Also… investors are not put off by large holders. You think BlackRock, Fidelity, and sovereign wealth funds are scared of a whale wallet? Nope. They’re buying because Bitcoin has no central authority and no rug-pull switch. This isn't a DeFi farm pump-and-dump. This is monetary revolution 101.

Grant

Does anyone know just how much BTC is left OTC?

Dan Menczel
>>169498483

I'd argue, if a big-enough entity controls the bulk of the BTC it can affect its price singe-handedly, hence it is not reistant to capture. Proof: what the market makers are already doing. What do you think?