Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Content

This chart, from my Alma Mater - Penn Wharton Budget Model shows how the “Big Beautiful Bill” in USA will likely affect people’s take-home pay (after taxes and government benefits) by 2026, compared to now. It breaks down the impact by income groups, from the poorest to the richest.

What’s Changing?

  • Income Groups: People are split into five income groups (quintiles), plus smaller groups for the wealthiest.

  • Key Measures: How much their take-home pay changes in dollars and as a percentage by 2026.

How It Affects Different Groups

Lowest Income ($0–$17,000)

  • Change: Down 13.6%

  • Dollars: Lose $940

  • What It Means: The poorest Americans will lose a big chunk of their income, likely because of cuts to government benefits or tax credits.

Low-Middle Income ($17,000–$51,000)

  • Change: Down 1.3%

  • Dollars: Lose $580

  • What It Means: This group also loses money, but not as much. They might face higher taxes or less government support.

Middle Income ($51,000–$93,000)

  • Change: Up 1.1%

  • Dollars: Gain $815

  • What It Means: Middle earners start to see small gains, probably from lower taxes or new benefits.

Upper-Middle Income ($93,000–$174,000)

  • Change: Up 2.3%

  • Dollars: Gain $3,075

  • What It Means: This group gets bigger benefits, likely from tax breaks or subsidies.

Top 20% (Wealthiest Groups)

  • $174,000–$263,000: Up 2.7%, gain $5,795

  • $263,000–$388,000: Up 2.7%, gain $8,560

  • $388,000–$988,000: Up 3.5%, gain $19,720

  • $988,000–$4,325,000: Up 2.6%, gain $44,190

  • $4,325,000+: Up 3.1%, gain $390,310

  • What It Means: The richer you are, the more you gain—especially the ultra-wealthy, who could get hundreds of thousands more. This points to big tax cuts for high earners, like on investments or capital gains.

Big Picture

  • Who Wins, Who Loses?

    • The bill favors the rich. The top 1% (especially the top 0.1%) get huge boosts, while the bottom 40%—especially the poorest—lose money. This widens the gap between rich and poor.

  • What’s in the Bill?

    • It likely includes tax cuts for the wealthy (like lower income or estate taxes, or special treatment for investment income).

    • It may cut benefits for the poor, like tax credits for low earners or families.

    • There could be business tax breaks that mostly help the rich.

  • Political Angle

    • The bill seems to follow a “trickle-down” idea: give more money to the rich to boost the economy.

    • It might upset lower-income people and politicians who want more fairness.

  • Economic Risks

    • Poor and low-middle earners spend most of their money, so their losses could slow down the economy.

    • Growing inequality might cause social tension and make it harder for people to move up.

H/T Sanjay for the research and more analysis is needed. I know Chamath was not happy with the bill.

Files

Previews only

Comments

WinstonChurchill

BULL CRAP!! The "poorest" in your bracket already are in a LOW tax bracket percentage because of our graduated tax system. So, the lowest brackets pay little or NOTHING in taxes... yet they suck the most out of the system in terms of welfare benefits, including things like free public education. To say this benefits the rich at the expense of the poor is ludicrous! If I'm paying 35% taxes and the poor man pays 2% taxes, I SHOULD GET A BIGGER CHUNK OF MY MONEY BACK in terms of percentages than the poor man. And yes, the poor people should pay more taxes if they want to suck out all the benefits from people who produce the wealth.

Zack

Hmmm the ability to invest is quite an advantage for people and if not for society forming governments to create this possibility, we may not have ever had the luxury of being able to create wealth in the form of trading investment vehicles.

robbymay

They pay little in taxes because they make no money. They can't afford a one bedroom appt almost anywhere