Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Content

This was fun... Grok BTC price predictions - part 1 "Grok 4’s 10 Year-End Bitcoin Price Predictions"

Then asking Grok refined predictions based on a number of factors, ETFs, Price Predictions, Treasuries, etc "Grok Indepth Analysis, Cycles, ETFs, Treasuries, Price Targets, Macro, M2 etc"

Then I calculated avgs and deltas

What I like about it is 2030 is very conservative!

Enjoy

Files

Previews only

Comments

ryu trades

Can you do the same for Tesla!

JrPike20

Where’s the bear cycle prices?

Kp monty

Sorry but don't see wallstreet allowing this to happen

ActionMan

Stupid question maybe, but what is "delta"...?

Amor fati

Im sorry, is this a stock or a crypto? Where could one buy this? thanks ❤️

Hafling with the Ring

I asked Grok for lows and highs for the ten-year period: Based on available data, here are the estimated low and high prices for Bitcoin each year from 2025 to 2035, rounded for clarity: 2025: Low - $70,000; High - $175,000 2026: Low - $150,000; High - $230,000 2027: Low - $170,000; High - $330,000 2028: Low - $200,000; High - $450,000 2029: Low - $275,000; High - $640,000 2030: Low - $380,000; High - $900,000 2031: Low - $541,000; High - $1,262,000 2032: Low - $757,000; High - $1,767,000 2033: Low - $1,060,000; High - $2,473,000 2034: Low - $1,325,000; High - $3,092,000 2035: Low - $1,656,000; High - $3,865,000

$at$tacker

It would help if the bottom chart was expandable

MadMax

If grok tells you BTC will appreciate in price every year 100k+ and no bear market is considered, I would question tha F this models and AI predictions. Looks like BS to me

Chuck3Putt

Much like others, I find it laughable, that it has no suggestion that there will be even the slightest bear. I suppose it could be just picking the highest point, but still. AI is just regurgitating a sum total of the internet. You can refine it by saying "with bear markets included", but it's still just regurgitating the refined request. It's basically an "Averaging Machine", but only as good as the 1) Verbiage used in the question, and 2) The ACTUAL VALUE of the internets average sentiment around that specific question form. It would take me a few days of digging, but I could come up with my own regurgitated average that would almost certainly end up closer than AI. Just by being more selective in sources like those in the know and who I have some smidgeon of faith in. "IA" would be included in those sources, but "AI" would not.