Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Content

Futures I reckon will be up on this deal. Markets WILL Like it.

Trade Deal Done! Who Won?

The EU avoids a potentially devastating trade war that could have fragmented global supply chains, and long-term benefits (e.g., from continued negotiations or US investments spurring mutual growth) could soften the blow.

However, on the deal's explicit terms—higher tariffs on EU goods, massive EU commitments to US purchases/investments, and limited US concessions—the US extracts disproportionate gains, making it the net beneficiary while the EU bears the net costs.

THE DETAILS

* The US and European Union reached a last-minute trade agreement just before new US tariffs were set to take effect, averting a potentially severe transatlantic trade war.

* The deal imposes a uniform 15% tariff on most EU exports to the US—including automobiles, chips, and pharmaceuticals—significantly higher than what the EU charges on US imports.

* President Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced the deal at Trump’s golf resort in Turnberry, Scotland, but withheld full documentation or granular details.

* Trump hailed the agreement as “the biggest of all the deals” and emphasized US goals: boosting domestic production and expanding export access to Europe.

* Von der Leyen called the deal “sustainable,” stressing its role in bringing “stability” and “predictability” while conceding it reflected a broader rebalancing of the EU’s trade surplus with the US.

* Tariff asymmetry drew criticism in Europe: Germany’s main industry lobby said the deal sends a “fatal signal” to the closely integrated transatlantic economies.

* Trump claimed key exemptions for US sectors: steel, aluminum, and drugs supposedly excluded. But von der Leyen countered that the 15% rate was inclusive—covering pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and cars.

* Von der Leyen clarified:

– 15% rate is flat and not additive to industry-specific tariffs.

– Metals tariffs will be reduced under a quota system.

– Pharma remains included, though subject to future US policy discretion.

* In exchange, the EU agreed to:

– Purchase $750B in US energy products.

– Invest $600B in the US economy.

– Buy significant amounts of US military hardware.

– Open some markets to zero-tariff US goods (details pending).

– Continue negotiations on wine, spirits, and future exemptions.

* Key concessions on pharma and chips were reportedly secured by EU promises of US investment.

* Without the agreement, the average US effective tariff rate would have risen to 18% from 13.5%; the deal caps it at ~16%.

* Trump previously threatened 50% tariffs on EU goods in May, later reducing to 30% under pressure, spurring the final phase of negotiations.

* The $1.7 trillion transatlantic trade flow faced major disruption; the deal removes that tail risk—though at the cost of higher EU-to-US border taxes.

* Trump’s broader tariff strategy—ranging from 15% to 50%—continues with other countries: Asia-Pacific partners like Japan and Indonesia have accepted similar arrangements; talks continue with Korea, Taiwan, Switzerland.

* Trump reiterated his intent to reset the global trade regime, blaming the EU for longstanding imbalances and “non-tariff barriers” like VAT, safety, and digital regulations.

* The EU had prepared retaliatory tariffs on $117B of US exports if the talks collapsed, and sought limits on future US industry-specific tariffs.

* The final agreement includes a quota system for steel/aluminum: low tariffs below a set threshold, 50% above.

* EU leaders accepted the imbalanced pact as the best option to preserve trade continuity and avoid full escalation.

* Market reaction:

– The euro rose 0.3% to 1.1773 in early Sydney trading.

– Risk of a new global trade contraction is now reduced.

– The announcement marked the climax of tense, months-long shuttle diplomacy between Washington and Brussels.

h.t Sanjay for the details

Files

Previews only

Comments

Chuz

As I said months ago, it will push costs to us citizens and will weaken the US global standing as new agreements will be formed leaving the US out.. it will all take time but I think the US citizens that think this is good are bonkers and falling for the gov nonsense

GreenStreet

EU will be happy to buy US energy and reduce the dependency on Russia. Trump and others are wrong about VAT which is applied to goods regardless of origin including domestically made so it does not discriminate against the US. Doesn’t the US have sales tax in many states?

mrcanning

"Buy significant amounts of US military hardware." This is currently by far the main focus of the EU. Keep arming Ukraine at the cost of the European taxpayer. We will be on the hook for the whole thing. Another war the US started, where the Europeans have to bear the brunt either economically or through mass migration of people. Thanks, Biden, you pr1ck!

Michael

I don’t think Europe exports much automobile in fact the cars that come in Europe are manufactured in Mexico and the chips are manufactured in China never heard any European company manufacturing chips at a large scale and exporting…

Michael

The war would have never started if gas pipeline wouldn’t have sabotaged and eventually we pay the price of it in gas prices and migration from war torn country

Zexia

This will set the precedence for more bad trade deals to come and or prolong the whole negotiation process.

CryptoBong

I know one thing from my experience and others and that is - a successful negotiation is that where involved parties leave the table with something they want. If one party mainly benefits then with time discontent will start bubbling up with the “losing” parties and inevitably that will result in a breakdown. So let Trump celebrate this near term win. This is not over. Cheers.

Lypto

Question for each of the team, who are your favourite three or four YouTube influencers that you feel are reputable? (Cant list each other lol) Doesn't have to be Crypto

Service Dogs for Vets

Out of sheer curiousity, I asked Grok to give the The Details section (minus market reaction) a percentage score for factual accuracy. Grok said it's 81% accurate, not too bad considering some of the things it was docking points for.

Elpilos

Working class loses, rich people always win and more with tump

Randomcryptoguy

Ursula once again did NOTHING for Europe, and that’s why everybody here hates her. Nonetheless kudos to Trump for getting a good deal, you guys deserve it too 💪🏽

Xanjo ✓

Grok is maybe accurate 50% of the time with up to date news and market prices

Ugottadigdeeper

I, more and more, come here for the comment section. It will be interesting to watch how the US citizen will pay the additional tax on EU goods with a weak US$ (and even more on imports from other countries). The entire world building new industries/production units in the US, while the current US-admin is deporting foreign workers (and of course students). The EU allegedly purchasing arms and military equ, which the US will built with which metal exactly...? Probably the next "go to war country" on the US Army agenda is a steel and alum rich one. Just hope the promised tax reliefs for US citizens and companies will be enforced for real, as atm only the US government seems to be profiting from such tax deals. I don't like the fact, that the bully (who by the way would face serious issues to solve, when going into an tax war with the EU) who is actually the weaker part in this wins over the one party trying to de-escalate the entire situation. As @CryptoBong says in comments above...would be very surprised if this is over in the mid to longrun. But of course Trump is selling this as the best thing ever happened to the US population.

BowTiedPutSeller

"Deporting foreign workers." LOL. The majority of illegal aliens are not working. They receive food, housing, and child support. Why work?

BowTiedPutSeller

What a ridiculous take. Trade deals with the largest partners are now done. That only leaves the small fry, like Canada, in even weaker positions. The EU and Japan undercut them all. India could be an exception, but it may not be. While I am certain you and the rest of the leftist twats on this thread were rooting for a trade war, you aren't getting one. Condolences.