Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Content

This was interesting... in particular the red bump!

Households' Yearly Income

  • Top 1% = ~$659K

  • Next 9% = ~$359K

  • 60% to 89% = ~131K

  • 30% to 59% = ~$72k

  • 10% to 29% = ~$30k

  • Bottom 9% = <$17K

Savings Rates by Income

  • Top 1% = ~38%

  • Next 9% = ~12%

  • 60% to 89% = ~4%

  • 30% to 59% = ~1%

  • 10% to 29% = ~10%

  • Bottom 9% = negative (dissaving)

So basically, only 30% are saving—but how is it that those earning 10–29% less can save so much, while those earning 30–59% more can’t? I have a few ideas:

The 10–29% income group saves more than the 30–59% group because of a few key reasons:

I could be offbase here

  1. Government help: Lower earners get more support (tax credits, housing aid, food and health benefits), freeing up cash to save.

  2. Middle-class squeeze: The 30–59% group earns too much for govt help but not enough to cover high living costs and debts, leaving little to save.

  3. Spending habits: Middle earners often spend to “keep up” w the Jones', while lower earners tend to be more cautious.

  4. Informal saving: Some lower earners save through family or community systems not captured in typical banking data.

H.T Sanjay for the data

Files

Previews only

Comments

JohnC

Here's another way to look at wealth of the nation: Top 10% ($ Trillions) Bottom 50% ($ Trillions) Q1 2000 26.5 3.5 Q1 2005 33.2 3.8 Q1 2010 37.9 3.7 Q1 2015 54.9 4.5 Q1 2020 78.7 5.5 Q2 2025 112.8 4.2 The top 10% are doing very, very well, having more than quadrupled wealth, while bottom 50% are stagnant. Life is good for the 10%. (Source: Grok)

Gizmo

#2 the squeeze is on. Increased income made me "poorer". Lost health care subsidies are hurting the most right now. It would be technically "financially responsible" for me to work/make less. But I want the other side of the fence!