Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Content

This week has been kind of garbage, Scout has failed to lift off 3 days in a row now. Generally, that's not a good thing, but I think we can use it as an opportunity to learn.

The first attempt was on Tuesday evening, Jan 15. On the first launch attempt the pad failed to light the ignitor at T-0. With an unknown cause at the launch site, I changed the ignitor and tried again. After a second failure to ignite, I swapped the ignitor one more time and tried again, still to no avail, so the site was packed up and I went home. The attempt on the 15th failed due a fried resistor in the pad ignition circuit, specifically on pyro channel 2 of the Impulse launch computer. The resistor fries when a short circuit occurs for more than a few seconds, it's sort of like a fuse to protect the rest of the electronics. The short term solution is better pre/post flight checks, the long term is better electrical engineering on the pyro channel itself.

The second attempt was on Wednesday evening, Jan 16th. Once again there were 3 attempts at ignition, all of which failed. After attempt 3, the launch was scrubbed. Once again all the equipment was packed up, and I headed home. Upon further testing and analysis, attempt #2 was determined to have failed because of a short between the ignition leads coming out of the computer. This was likely also the root cause of the fried resistor on attempt #1. Again, the fix here is the same - better checks in the short term, better engineering in the long term.

For the third attempt on Thursday, Jan 17th, the car was once again packed and I headed out to the launch site. The forecast predicted a 17% chance of rain, but upon arriving at the site and waiting for a while, the rain wouldn't let up.

Each one of these attempts costs time and money. Because of the cold weather, I burn about 8 heat pads per attempt to keep the cameras on and warm, their batteries die far too quickly in the cold. Each attempt requires about a full day of prep as well, so other work cannot be done. I don't mean to complain, the point here is that there's tremendous incentive here to make irresponsible decisions at the launch site.

When the stakes are high, especially on later attempts after several failures, it's really tempting to push forward despite anomalies or problems on the pad. I could have rigged up a car battery to the ignitor, I could have put a blanket over the rocket in the rain until it was time to launch, there are usually sketchy ways to solve problems on the pad and 9 times out of 10 they're bad ideas that seem fine in the moment. 

Some of this is overkill for model rockets, but the point here is that it's almost always better to scrub and wait another day than it is to blindly push forward. Nearly every time I've tried to come up with sketchy launch-day solutions to a problem, they've failed. This is sometimes referred to as "Go Fever" in the orbital launch industry, and it's something many rocketeers end up experiencing. 

There's no cool engineering here, just wanted to provide a quick update and some thoughts on keeping things safe at the launch site. We'll get Scout flying soon!

Blue skies,

Joe


Files

Previews only

Comments

U.S. Water Rockets

Great advise, because as they say "Been there, done that!" Many moons ago when we built the very first flightworthy carbon fiber water rocket, we were so convinced that it was going to break the world record that we got so impatient waiting for favorable winds that we decided to launch at dawn, when the air was calm, which we never did before. The lake was as flat as a mirror, and we launched the rocket and it visually exceeded our wildest expectations. What we didn't know is that at that altitude there was a stiff breeze blowing, and when the chute deployed it caught the breeze. When rocket chutes deploy in a good wind they make this peculiar motion where they start descending and then "lean into" the wind. This motion always reminds me of the way Charlie Brown leans into his sprint when he's about to try and kick the football that Lucy inevitably yanks back. This particular design had two independent parachutes, one for the pressure vessel and one for the avionics. This was back when deploying a parachute without pyrotechnics was still being perfected, so we had the two separate parachutes to try and guarantee that one would work. The avionics could tumble recovery if that chute failed, and the pressure vessel would survive a splashdown in the lake if that chute failed. The single chute rockets we flew previously would pile-drive the avionics into the lake and destroy them. This was when an altimeter was >$100 and a small onboard camera was $150, so we cooked up the dual parachute scheme. This was one of the first flights using that system. We should have done more testing on this as well, but once again "Go Fever" got the best of us. Ultimately, the avionics parachute was grossly oversized (we re-used one we had on hand, in a rush to launch) and with the breeze blowing at altitude, the poor avionics bay slowly floated off into a thick woods. We never found it. It did have a piezo locator beacon on it, but when you design one of those things like I did, you don't realize that every frog and cricket in the woods sounds just like the locator. Since then we fixed many of these issues, perfected the parachute deploy, and added a radio location beacon to the avionics. We learned a lot of lessons that day! Thanks for bringing up this topic and sending me down memory lane.

Anonymous

I work in the cyber security industry and taking a course to learn offensive security skills to inform defense and a course motto for for a training I’ve started is “Try Harder”. It’s hard but those personal lessons on “pushing through” are a good teacher. Hope the quick wins start rolling in soon. BTW id love to hear a little more about the design, details, and tech built into the launch pad I the future as I don’t think you’ve covered that much right?

BPS.space

Thanks! And I haven't talked about that much, correct! Maybe I'll do a live stream soon with some more details. I'd like to publish the pad building files later this year as well, but I'll try to get something out in the meantime :)