Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

Kubrick shot a lot of pictures about America, but only one about being an expat. His Barry Lyndon is a man with no country or creed, voracious appetites but not many true desires. He wants to be a wealthy man, I suppose, but he's more interested in burning through wealth than belonging to the upper class. He possesses many things but retains none of them.

Some critics have described Lyndon as a passive character to whom things happen. This isn't strictly true; he's a quasi-folk legend, a literary character whose exploits are more significant than his interiority. Kubrick shows his character more through his adventures than any great dive into his soul. Other characters — usually bourgeois assholes — diagnose the state of Lyndon's soul throughout the movie. They reach the accurate conclusion that he's a bounder, but they don't understand what he wants any more than Lyndon does himself.

Lyndon's life is a folk story catalyzed by history. He's an anti-Great Man of History, caught in the Great Mechanism, stumbling through wars and empires, trying frantically to grab hold of something, anything that will make his miserable and frenetic life a bit more leisurely. He ultimately ends up in a place slightly better than where he starts, but well short of where he wants to end up. Kubrick's finest character.

We can talk about the amazing cinematography another day.

Files

Comments

Christine

I watched this movie for the first time and just as it ended got the notification for this post. Uncanny timing! Great movie

Christine

Hi!! I normally don't comment because I just like to read but I literally looked down from Kubrick's directing credit to see the post and it felt so wild that I had to acknowledge it. What a good movie about ritualized violence.