Home
Creators
Search Recent Missing Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register Favorites Keys Review DMs Logout
Community
Telegram ThePornDude
Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Weekly Webinar #79: What Might Happen Next (Patreon)

Published:
2021-10-03 13:10:46
Imported:
2026-06
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Content

Full recording.

Files

Previews only

Weekly Webinar #79: What Might Happen Next

Comments

Anonymous

The Chinese posses an estimated 290 nuclear warheads, classed at dozens of kiloton yield. This is considered a deterrent capability. The US arsenal is an estimated 6000+ nukes, most of which are classed at over 1 megaton yield. The concept of "mutually ensured destruction" is a joke, even during the cold war nobody actually believed it was a reality. The first target in an nuclear exchange is not going to be civilian population centers, it will be the adversaries nuclear capability. The US can land 3 nukes on each known Chinese nuclear missile site and still have another 5000 nukes left over. This is assuming that a nuclear exchange takes place, which it most likely will not.

Anonymous
>>69069191

I think it is not realistic that if it ever comes to a nuclear war there would be more than a couple of hundred detonations. Let's say a maximum of 300 from each side. That would be a serious blow to the infrastructure, but not enough to create a Nuclear Winter or end humanity. Not to mention even if all hell breaks lose, there is no reason to bomb most of the Third World.

Anonymous

Just when the Coach says “anything can happen, we can get struck by a meteor”, the power in my neighborhood goes out :D

Anonymous

As far as news sources I would steer clear of RT as it’s a propaganda network for the Russian state. I would say their level of journalism is on the level of CNN. Don’t fall for the fact that they will tell you a lot of things about the US or the west that are seemingly true, and keep in mind that this is used as filler to make you swallow a lie that they consider to be critical to their narrative. This is the reason why many westerners who listen to them fail to understand the level of dysfunction that is taking place within Russia itself, because networks like RT make it seem like an efficient and lean economic and military machine, but in reality Russia is far from that. I would recommend Epoch Times instead. I find them to be much more objective without a spin, they just give you the facts and let you decide for yourself. There are a few good Russian analysts / historians / writers that analyses current events, but since they only broadcast in Russian most westerners will unfortunately not be able to take advantage of listening to them.

Anonymous

Unfortunately I missed the live broadcast. Wanted to ask you this Coach: is it wild to think there's a depopulation program underway? 1) If you look at the and world debt charts, population and government debt appear to be corollaries -- growing rapidly together since the 20th century 2) Any attempts to unwind/deleverage these debts must A) be done in concert with other countries (agree on "controlled" crash) B) must take population into account. 3) We know that climate issues are en vogue among the world elite: how can there be any serious discussion of climate (ostensibly) without the population? I'm not Malthusian or rooting for this, it just seems logical: the entire debt bomb has been to service/accommodate a growing planet.

Anonymous

^ Lol I’ve seen that. The dialogue is so forced , acting so bad, it must be intentional. What if the push to depopulate isn’t an evil plot, but some kinda twisted “moral” equation by our world elite: i.e., we live in a period of abundance and unprecedented wealth; a global deleveraging could plunge much of the world back into misery; it’s better socially, politically and economically to cut the population in half? Coach raised the stagflation issue yesterday. What if fewer goods is precisely the point?

Anonymous

An issue CRP over looked is the segment of the population that goes along with all the new government restrictions. They're fine with giving up Liberty for Safety. They tend to be ‘city’ people. Are they 1/5 - 2/5th of all residents, true/accurate? Does it vary by region and country? Exemptions: Some teachers, capitol staffers and the Post Office are exempt from the ‘jab’ How serious is this going to get?

Anonymous
>>69119369

Coach has suggested this. A bunch of people trying to do the right thing, they are just idiots.

Anonymous

Coach just wanted to let you know here in Washington state the legislation is working on passing the law for unvaccinated camps, and detainment. The documentation leaked this morning is sad to say but everything we fear is happening. I can see everything the coach is predicting coming true, its a grim reality. I hope that it's not as extreme as the coach makes it, but I am preparing for the worst.

Anonymous

As bad as this may sound. Maybe a webinar about how to profit from all this crazy shit? I'd rather pull a Rothchild and profit from these wars, hyperinflation, vaccine madness. So I can make some big bucks to live on my own somewhere and get away from the crazyness.

Anonymous
>>69335581

It would involve you getting into bed (figuratively and literally) with the elites at many levels. You will end up with a broken heart and blackened soul.