Home
Creators
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register Favorites Keys Review DMs Logout
Community
Telegram ThePornDude
Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Harry Potter and The Goblet of Fire - Patreon Version (Patreon)

Published:
2021-12-20 13:20:13
Imported:
2026-06
Tags:
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Content

No Sync Required Version: https://cinebingers.ca/nWPaZV85a1 - For Patreon tier "Bingers on The Wall" or higher.

Files

Previews only

Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire - Patreon Version

Comments

fwfwfwfwf wfwfw

i like the harry potter movie seires but i HATED how they made the fourth movie. the book was awesome though.

Marcus Hicks

Bit late to the comments on this, but the most disappointing part of the book being translated to film was all the details lost from the Maze Challenge and the details relating to priori incantatum.

Ian Forbes

Steve Kloves adapted the books to screenplays for all 8 movies and the last 4 films will retain the same director, which will help maintain the tone and aesthetic of the franchise moving forward. Keep up the great reactions!

Jon Johns

Devon, Hampstead, and surrey. The Burrow was the family home of the Weasley family, located on the outskirts of Ottery St Catchpole in Devon, England. Hermione, at least in the films, lives with her parents in Hampstead, and Harry's Aunt & Uncle Durseley (sp?) Live in Surrey. Harry & Hermione are only an hour apart, and probably have good public transportation access, but Ron is almost 4 hours away from London.

JediLounger

I remember being very frustrated by this movie when I saw it in theaters, so much so that I skipped the other 4, and only saw them on home video. They changed and compressed so much of this book that it’s almost not the same story. The same basic idea is still there, but most of the guts of the book that made it fun to read are gone. After the first task it’s better, but the first hour or so the movie feels so rushed. I think they do a better job with books 5 and 6, and book 7 is split in two.

Matthew Hamby

To be fair, the books continued to get larger and larger while these runtimes don't. If I remember correctly, when asked about what to put into the movie and what to leave out, the writers said they largely stuck with Harry Potter's story and left the rest. So, you end up not getting the ambiance but you generally get the core, for better or worse. Personally, I liked this movie and then next because I hadn't read the books. Watching films first, then reading the books allows me to enjoy both usually. I did, however, make the mistake of reading 6 and 7 before watching the movies and obviously have less admiration for those movies as opposed to the first 5. I'm sure people who read the books as kids before the movies even came out have a similar opinion as JediLounger.

JediLounger
>>74066450

Yeah now looking back on it, it makes sense why they did it like this, it was just a first time in the moment reaction. I like all the movies now, movie 5 being my favorite. I think my issue with this movie is every scene is important in the first hour, everything drives the plot forward and has consequence. It helps a lot if just a bit of levity is thrown in there, even just for a minute. In the first hour even stuff that’s supposed to be funny has clues and hints about what’s really going on if you know what to look for (the ferret scene). It seems to me that when Harry has the little accident with his drink in the dining hall the movie suddenly pulls the reigns and slows down for the rest of the runtime, and it benefits greatly because of it.

PaulChristopher

Remember the first movie? The Phoenix feather that supplied the core of his wand had also given a feather to the wand that became Voldemort's. The two cores reacted to each other and caused the essence of the last spells cast by Voldemort's wand to manifest. In reverse order, they appeared: Cedric, the caretaker, Lily Potter, James Potter.

JediLounger

So at the end of the reaction you guys comment on the when Dumbledore said no one could raise the dead, that Voldemort came back. There is a very good reason for this, it will come back around. Keep this in mind for later.

Githerax

Had another idea for a classic movie; '2001: A Space Odyssey'; also, did I already suggest 'Hunt for Red October'?

JarHead0351

BTW thanks for doing Harry Potters movie, been rewatching along with you both and enjoying it all over thru you two - Thanks -- since you both might like a gamer movie which is a great one in my opinion - "Ready Player One" great story with action and fun Fan Boy reference too and another one which was good is "Free Guy" which is more funny

MJ

I feel like Hogwarts is dangerous to prepare them for the dangerous wizard world. Gotta be prepared somehow🤷‍♂️

gobmob2000

A few points to help out: - Voldemort was not resurrected, he was still alive but in a weakened state, in the potter universe nothing can bring a person back from the dead. - Wizards have much better medicine then muggles (harry was able to regrow a bone overnight), it has also been shown that wizards are "tougher" then muggle, able to survive great falls and big hits with only a scratch, so this could explain why wizards are less safety conscious. - They changed Dumbledore's character in this film, in the book Dumbledore was a lot calmer and thoughtful. - The kids where not kidnapped, in the books it was made clear that the kids in the water challenge where always safe and not in any real danger. - A lot of details where left out from the book into this film because the book was a large story, this is probably why the film felt a little disjointed, tbh if any film should have been in two parts, it should have been goblet of fire.

Darth Rhyme

As others have said old Voldy was never truly dead, I believe in the books they go in deeper about what exactly he is before being brought back. He's something just before a spirit basically, in that form he was able to possess weak minded people, certain creatures. That snake, Nagini, that you see in the visions is one example of an animal he "bonded" with. They also detail that most of the things he tried to inhabit couldn't take his presence for very long and would die. Can't remember if they explain the deformed baby form but it's often hinted that he's using something to gain a small bit of his power, enough to at least hold a wand and cast spells rarely which is why he was able to kill the caretaker in the beginning. Oh and the Crabbe and Goyle that Voldemort named in the graveyard weren't the ones that Malfoy hangs out with, it's their parents. The Death Eaters follow Voldemort for a few reasons, some simply because he is incredibly powerful, others out of fear like Wormtail, then the truly deranged ones like daddy Malfoy who believe (as Voldy believes) that Magic should belong solely to those of pure magical blood. That anyone of impure blood, or no magical blood belong subservient to them or in many cases just don't deserve to live. In the books they talk more about the days before Voldemort fell, it was a time of true fear. Never knowing who to trust because of the Imperius curse (it's not just body control, but mind as well.) Also not sure if you caught the little snippet where Harry was witnessing the trials in the past, Barty Crouch Jr was the one who helped torture Neville's parents with the Cruciatus curse. It literally drove them insane. They are alive and are in the wizarding hospital until permanent care with no hope of recovery. That's why Moody's (actually Barty Jr.) display of it bothered him so much, making it even more cruel that Barty knew this and took part in it just to torture Neville in front of everyone without anyone knowing, even Neville.

Mark Buser

Regarding the old man, something the movie leaves out/doesn't make obvious is he is the grounds keeper for the old Riddle house. The reason he went to investigate the light is nobody lived in the house for a long time, and kids would break in. That's also why Voldie was there, it was his old home. He showed up at the end because he was killed by Voldie's wand. The spirits that showed up were in reverse order of who was killed by Voldie's wand, like a stack. Cedric, old man, Lily, James.

Thomas88

Igor Karkarov was killed too, because he named the others. Its not shown in the movie, like soooo many things, mostly because David Newel (sp?) didnt read the books and didnt care for the book material.

Daniel Horsman

You say you wish you could say things like "bloody hell", but you're out here saying things like "jeepers" XD The grass is always greener on the other side.

Oouga

It seems a shame that no one points out: Slytherin is rumored to be bad. "There wasn't a witch or wizard who went bad who wasn't in Slytherin," per Ron in the first movie/ book. But they're wrong. Peter Pettigrew was in Gryffindor and was so dark he helped kill Harry's parents and helped re-body Voldemort. Each house had dark wizards. Slytherin, being ambitious and driven, just are more famous for it. But each house, including Slytherin, would have had good wizards, too.

David RedEagle

Baby Batman, I will always refer to him as Baby Batman hahahaha.

Thomas Young
>>74159999

I loved that, In the book, Frank Bryce (the old man) says, "He was a real wizard then? Killed me, he did. You fight him boy!" This line and the general way hes described in the opening chapter really make him seem like a tough old man. He was literally standing up to wormtail and voldemort in the old house and refused to back down. He only showed any weakness when voldemorts chair is turned around, and he sees the weird fetus/baby voldemort, and it freaks him out.