Home
Creators
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register Favorites Keys Review DMs Logout
Community
Telegram ThePornDude
Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

The Social Network - Patreon Version (Patreon)

Published:
2024-02-29 13:00:05
Imported:
2026-06
Tags:
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Content

No Sync Required Version: https://cinebingers.ca/yzRZBIc3q5 - For Patreon tier "Bingers on The Wall" or higher.

Movie runtime: 2:00:27

Files

Previews only

The Social Network - Patreon Version

Comments

Jay Davis

Well well. What a nice surprise!

Rob M

I’ve been wanting to rewatch this for so long, so this is a perfect surprise for me

Deserana12

Yessssss! Love that they got round to this! Early in my top 5 films ever, hope they love it! One of the best music scores of all time too

JakeyShakeyBakeyBoy

Lmao knew exactly where that “anti-fungal cream” story was headed. “Shit happens when you party naked” right? Anyways, David Fincher is an awesome director and this screenplay is terrific, even if everyone talks like a whip-smart wordsmith haha. Also gotta love the Trent Reznor score, even though it won an Oscar over How To Train Your Dragon’s score by John Powell. So memorable and energetic.

Big Gee

Finally been waiting for y’all to get to this one. Great film great writing and score

Mark Messer

Oh, I thought you guys were doing monsters Inc.

Mark Messer

So I’m just curious is monsters Inc going to be put back into another pol, or are you guys still doing it at some point?

Cinebinge
>>131015889

its on the way, just pixar/disney copyright being strict and so taking some time to re-edit and wait for approval.

PIG

Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross of Nine Inch Nails did the score :)

Sumner Hayes

The SAT is a college entrance test. Especially before about 2005, it was required by a majority of colleges/universities as part of the admission process to schools on the coasts (there is another test called the ACT that was more popular in the interior South and midwest). The test is a multiple-choice test, and consists of 2 parts, a verbal and a math section, each of which can have a score from 200 to 800. So a total of 1600 is a perfect score.* These days there are on the order of ~500 people each year who get a 1600 (estimates vary by source), so it's a significant achievement but not crazy rare. There have been a lot of criticisms of the SAT and ACT (notably for being biased racially and toward higher economic classes, also for not accounting well for ADHD and other neurotypes). A number of schools never required them for that reason, and beginning around 2000–2005, a lot more schools made them optional. That peaked around 2020, and recently there a bit of a move back toward more schools requiring them, though the way they're interpreted and used has changed quite a bit. The historical geographic distinction between the SAT and the ACT has also blurred a lot in recent years, with many more schools allowing you to take either one rather than requiring a particular test. *As a historical note, from 2005–2016 there was an additional writing section, so a perfect score was 2400.

djKENTO

Can we PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD get a reaction to the extended cut of Alien 3? Fincher’s first movie, stacked cast, totally different tonal shift… and it’s gonna scare the shit out of SImone so PLEASE. I want yall to see how far he’s come. And even in what some people call a misstep, he shows a LOT of fuckin style.

REDR58

If you are seeing nothing but “angry people” on Facebook, maybe just delete those people from your friends? I use and have used FB for years as a way to stay in touch with old school friends and family. I don’t have “angry people” or things I don’t want to see on there. Then again, I don’t use FB all that much beyond seeing what people are up to.

Tenwyn

I have a question about these types of films - do they need permission from everyone depicted? I'm wondering because if so then why would Sean Parker be okay with this, he comes off really bad in it so I wouldn't imagine he would have been okay with it.

REDR58
>>131011110

Maybe it’s just me but I don’t find anything particularly embarrassing, never mind humiliating about accidentally buying the wrong product, even if it is intended for women? Maybe just return it? It’s not that big of a deal.

Odd Thomas

Still holding out for a reaction to my favourite Fincher movie, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (2011). Rooney Mara (Erica Albright in Social Network) plays the lead.

Odd Thomas

I deleted Facebook years ago. Never miss it.

Patrick

Haven't used Facebook in like 6 years. Coincidentally, my freshmen year of college was around the time that Facebook no longer required you to have a .edu email domain. Social media is the devil. It was pretty good back then. There were no ads or links to news articles. It was just friends sharing pictures or updates.

W T

I mean, that's funny, and you would probably want to try and use medicine or salves indicated for a particular issue, but antifungal ingredients will work for a range of dermatophytes and, depending on the precise ingredients, would certainly work if you're dealing with a fungal problem. Clotrimazole, miconazole, terbinafine... plus yeast infections, as much as we love to associate it with the "funni areas," as the Pope would say, can occur pretty much everywhere, including in your blood, brain, and even bones when we're dealing with invasive candidiasis. So always be proud and confident when buying over-the-counter medicine, what better way to dissolve repressions in young, sheltered people shyly browsing the pharmacy when men in their thirties can buy vaginal creams just fine? o7

djKENTO

Rowing is born out of location. In England professionals who worked on the River Thames would race to prove who’s best. Then it became a sport. Schools started getting into the sport and the universities. Then the Ivy League schools which are born out of UK traditions carried the sport. It doesn’t hurt that the water ways were similar. Again location is involved. The tradition continues thanks to dedicated alumni. As you move west you run out of rivers to row on so location again factors in.

W T
>>131031961

It is the big question with automatically curated content: can you expect users to make the proper decisions to end up with a ragebait and hate-heavy feed? Because all the platforms (especially twitter, which happens to be freaking amazing if you manage to just put together a list of people to follow that talk a lot about their hobbies and jobs) work like that and, in many ways, have worked like that since way before the Internet: you surround yourself with negative people, chances are that's what you're attracted to and/or what you will end up becoming. The discussion about facilitating dumb people getting together and doing even dumber things is obviously a bit different, but at the same time I feel like at least that's a bit of an open sieve allowing for the real big brains to just post stuff openly and encourage action, whereas 40 years back, they might have managed to keep their bad plans under wraps... it's weird situation, but we really have no baseline to compare the effects to because we barely experienced a "grown" Internet without social media. Arguably an inevitably, too; people aren't necessarily as carefree with their social circles online anymore, but there is no chance in hell that we are all connected and decide to outright dismiss our desire to share cat pics and videos with each other. But yeah: if you feel like you are trapped in negativity, consider a friendenema and just flush out the poor devils who are trapped in their spiral of talking down on people and being against everyone and what-have-you. And don't interact with that sort of thing either, which is of course easier said than done, but if nobody read tabloids and low-effort media outlets, they wouldn't exist in the first place.

W T

About when the fb hype began: text processing class for Chinese Studies somewhere around 2008. Lots of goofing off with the teacher in the room, so all people did was abuse it as one massive group chat at the time. Flirting and all that stuff too in the dms, kind of was fun. Dropped off after not quite a decade in my circles, never deleted my account, never had to delete friends, disabled most notifications and cleaned-up my embarrassing posts and comments. I'm kind of a fan of Meta and their VR-leaning contributions, I don't really buy into the entire "Fuckerberg bad"-circlejerk anyway and I even like how he articulates his thoughts about certain topics that interest me, so technically I'm still part of the original fb ecosystem. Sure ended up being a prototype of what social media could be, although I suppose myspace really covered all of it way before. Yes, of course I had a myspace account. Edit: about FB being obsolete: it definitely is still very popular across many social brackets. Not so much for the young folks, but with middle-aged and older users, fb sure is pulling some weight. It also depends very much on your region, FB gained a lot of traction with European and Asian audiences, similar to (their-then own product) WhatsApp - which was a pretty big underdog compared to, say, Snapchat in the US, while WA/FB still completely dominate countries like Germany, Brazil, or India. Meanwhile, try telling someone in any of the many nations going hard on Meta products that kids (used to) communicate with an app branded and designed to take pictures. Weirdly enough, that's how half of us ended up communicating anyway, but that's another story, I suppose. Point being: it is still going pretty strong outside of North America, although the target audience shifted even more towards old people. Nothing like myspace though, that was a fun romp, but it was far from finished or awfully feasible product. I mean, maybe for what it was, but it's not like we're still using it today.

ChickensAreRacist

Was not alone in being pleasantly surprised you two reacted to this. Man, I hope they do a sequel based on how it’s gone since or a certain further segment of Zuckerberg’s life, written of course by Aaron Sorkin. And speaking of which, Simone!! Keep watching West Wing! I’m glad you like it after a couple episodes. It’s a stellar show for at least the first 4-5 seasons.

REDR58
>>131038394

I wonder (in general, not asking you specifically), has no guy here ever bought “sanitary” products for a girlfriend or wife? Or maybe a lady friend is visiting and has an accident and you need to run out and grab some for her because you don’t normally have such things on hand? I’ve done that. It’s not a big deal. And it shouldn’t be embarrassing either. It’s just a thing you need to do. Who cares? Life is too short to dwell on nonsense like being embarrassed about this sort of thing.

Patrick

Random side note related to FB, there's a Korean-American artist named David Cho who when he was younger and broke, decided to accept a commission job to do a few murals inside a startup tech company in exchange for a small amount of cash and some future stock options. That company was called facebook and those stock options made him over 200 million. (He's in th show BEEF on netflix)

Ballsac McGee

The movie isn't a very accurate representation of what zuckerberg is like as a person. From everyone who knew him back at harvard, he was very friendly and outgoing person and he was already dating his now wife when he founded facebook. Erica Albright doesn't exist. She was invented for this movie to serve as the story device. Also, facemash wasn't the precursor to facebook. It was a different project that Zuckerberg worked on before facebook. The wilkenvi didn't have the idea for harvard connection from facemash. The news about facemash was significant for them because it demonstrated zuckerberg's capabilities as a coder which is what motivated them to hire him. So they didn't get the idea for harvard connection from facemash.

David Butler

George, that was a fabulous story at the start. Thanks for sharing 🤣🤣

Hi I'm George Junior, but my friends call me Geo-Ju

🖤Watching this unlocked an old Facebook (or sorry THE Facebook) memory for me. I was in a college that was in one of the earlier waves that got invites to use Facebook so I remember its original interface and the homepage had this dude on the top left hidden behind the 1's and 0's. In the movie, they use Jesse Eisenberg's face (so implying that face was Mark Zuckerburg's) but when George laughed and pointed out "Wow he used his own face" I remembered the face that was actually there didn't look anything like Mark Zuckerburg. I remember that picture looking like Sylvester Stallone. I'd always log in and wonder who this Sylvester Stallone-looking dude was and why was he the face of Facebook. Just looked into it tho, his friend made that and used a picture of Al Pacino. For those reading this, check out the thumbnail for the YT edit, they used the old interface for it that shows the guy I'm talking about at the top left. Tell me that dude doesn't look like Sylvester Stallone XD

Brian Sittler

Apparently like next to none of the stuff depicted in this movie is accurate. Fun watch still tho.

p0sthum4n
>>131054655

It's not completely inaccurate. Like any adaptation of real events for the screen, it takes some liberties for drama. I saw someone describe it once as "fiction wrapped around the bones of truth" which I think is a good way to look at most "based on a true story" non-documentary films. "Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz called the film a "dramatization of history ... it is interesting to see my past rewritten in a way that emphasizes things that didn't matter, (like the Winklevosses, who I've still never even met and had no part in the work we did to create the site over the past 6 years) and leaves out things that really did"

p0sthum4n

I have sincerely come to despise not only Facebook but all social media as a concept and think it is causing some genuine harm to the fabric of community and society. I really wish I could be rid of it. I'm required to have access to Facebook for work, and I have some older relatives who find it easier to keep in touch that way (my 94 year old grandmother just started using it in the last 3-4 years) so I'm stuck with it for the time being. Love this movie though.

W T
>>131051719

I like how the movie admits to it right at the end, but I also kind of think these kinds of biopics (and I love this movie for the most part) do themselves a disservice by turning the anti-hero/villain into such a douchebag when there is always room to create this story out of his real personality and the people involved - or the financial mechanisms. I mean, I really get it, make him evil. Anyone with a recommendation for a corporate comedy take on something like this? Better off Ted-like maybe? The economics and business part about it all is also nonsense. None of this is awfully accurate, and yes, share dilution is a thing, but also... Severin was definitely negligent by not accounting for it with a clause preventing his shares to get involved in a process that always was going to happen: you issue more stock. Not much to it, this is the reality of financing your company; more stock is just another way of saying we need to raise funds, and Eduardo would or should have known this for a very long time. Of course, shady dealings and making people trust your word and all that jazz is worth a debate of its own, but with the compensation everyone involved received and the little they contributed to the intermediate result alone, nobody really got shafted here. I don't really care for the "autistic coder nerd alienates women"-trope. Dude seems really happy IRL and I honestly always enjoy his presentations and talks, I laughed at the South Park portrayal of the popular sentiment about him, I love how everyone repeating the same two jokes, insta-derailing any semi-related comment section, just basically proves they're the robots. Either way, a bit overplayed here. Especially compared to his RL alter ego, see also the whole beef with Musk when the guy is pretty jacked. Would have been hilarious to see him just wreck stuff, but I guess we got the beer bottles. Still a great movie, imho. Could have been more, and I just think Fincher really is better suited for criminal psychology stuff (I loved Mindhunter)... but I also would instantly accept the invitations to give it a rewatch.

Martin

Thoughts and prayers on your yeast infection, George. :)

p0sthum4n

Also, funny trivia bit: the (at the time) President of Harvard portrayed in this film brushing the Winklevii off later said this: "Rarely, have I encountered such swagger, and I tried to respond in kind," Summers recalled. "One of the things you learn as a college president is that if an undergraduate is wearing a tie and jacket on Thursday afternoon at three o'clock, there are two possibilities. One is that they're looking for a job and have an interview; the other is that they are an asshole. This was the latter case."

Alex Ch

Thanks guys, this was a lot of fun! Looking forward to Clue on Saturday!

Haye Zeus

Ya’ll need to stop “pussyfooting” around during the intro and get to it. 😜

Anthony Villena

I think the way Sean Parker was portrayed in this was the media industry getting back at him for Napster

Skyruff

I am not a lawyer but have had to deal with US copyright and patent situations. In general the “idea” is what you own the rights too. And the idea grants production rights, but they can also be a separate right. It’s very complicated. The idea has to be a specific and well defined idea not a concept. You cannot own the rights to “a device which produces light from a bulb.” But you can own the writes to something like “a device that converts electricity by passing a current through a copper wire enclosed in a partial vacuum transparent or translucent glass container . Within the container the copper wire loops with a breach in the copper wire bridged by a crinkled tungsten steel wire. When current is run through the wires the steel will glow proportionate to the current. See attached schematic etc.” As depicted in the film he did directly copy the idea, but the idea was very generic. We don’t see enough to really know.

Ste Rawlings

The greatest film of that decade in my opinion.

Brad Lowry

Regarding your Fungal Cream that turned out to be for Yeast Infection. I am surprised, George, that you didn't think about the QI Episode 2 of Series Q, "Quintessential" which is one of my all time favorites. You will love that it covers Einsteinian "Spooky Action at a Distance". More particularly, they cover "Quorum Sensing" in biological terns and the way that Hawaiian Bobtail Squid are given bioluminescence from bacteria. To which the incomparable Holly Walsh replied that it would be a fair bargain if she got bioluminescence every time she got Thrush, which upon Googling it, it turns out is British for Yeast Infection. Which became one of the best running gags within QI Episodes of all time. https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=qaIu86NSbaU

Opti_Frog

I haven't watched this reaction yet, but i will. Right now i'm here to say that i just watched the two first episodes of Shōgun back to back, and omg i really, really hope we can get a Cinebinge reaction. 😃

Grumblefunk
>>131022495

surprised neither of them caught that, the score and sound design in this film are fantastic

Jesse Coombs

I know it's a show, but "Fleishman Is in Trouble" stars Jesse Eisenberg and is one of the best things I've seen in the last few years.

Orphan Crippler

I just saw your youtube lineup as "Tremors" "X-men" And "Monsters inc".. Oh oo Did George make a mistake ;)

Cinebinge
>>131093275

Nope! It's coming later this week, just needed to swap the Patreon release dates due to copyright problems.

VinnyAhhh

[Disclaimer: I've been an employee at FB/Meta for close to 5 years now] This is one of my favorite movies of all time — that hacking scene in the beginning with the music and the quick cutting between their dorm room and the finals club gets me so pumped up every time I watch it. This is actually the first time I've seen this movie since joining FB and at least in my (albeit limited) experience observing Mark it definitely feels like the movie used the "nerd w/ no social skills & awareness" trope moreso because it made for a better story instead of it being reflective of Mark irl.

Dr Ozzy

Funnily enough Rashida Jones graduated from Harvard 2 years before Natalie Portman got there.

Ricardo Alanis

I was at Harvard when facebook launched and I remember when it was an invite-only site. It’s been fascinating to see its evolution from a friends’ hangout to a mass social media site. I am 41 and mostly use it to connect with my best friends from college and high school. A friend even set up a friends’ group where no politics are allowed and it’s just a space to share positive news, jokes, LOTR memes, etc. In my time there (2001-2005), Natalie Portman was definitely the most well known star there. She was a year ahead of me in the Psych department. I was at Kirkland house and must have crossed paths with Zuckerberg at some point but not in any memorable way. Glad to see this reaction and hope The Game is not too far behind.

REDR58

Zuckerberg had nothing to do with authorizing or allowing the movie to be made: https://nymag.com/movies/features/68319/ The royal…after the race, the Winklevoss twins are introduced to Albert II, Prince of Monaco (currently 65 years old). His mother, Grace Kelly was an actor, retiring after about 7 years to marry Rainier III, Prince of Monaco. Grace Kelly’s father, Jack Kelly (Albert’s grandfather) from Philadelphia (where Grace was born) was a rower and a triple Olympic gold medalist in the 1920 and 1924 games. Albert has been to 5 Winter Olympics as a bobsleigh competitor. Grace Kelly died at age 52 as the result of a cerebral hemorrhage, resulting in a car accident followed by another cerebral hemorrhage. She was one of the most famous women in the world when she married Rainier III.

sarCC

"'Vaginal insert'!" "Nice." I'm so happy I'm a patron. That made my day 🤣

Amar

My first time using Facebook was when it first came out, me and my wife were at university and to this day i still remember going onto it in the early years and girls were being compared from our own College. That comparing girls according to nothing but their looks was gone before our first year ended, more people signed up then.

Sumner Hayes
>>131076310

"I am not a lawyer but have had to deal with US copyright and patent situations. In general the “idea” is what you own the rights too." That's mostly true of patent law, but it's the opposite of how copyright law works—and patent law was never at issue in the Facebook/Winklevoss case (no patents were involved), so "ideas" never really came into play. Patents are granted on a process, machine, article of manufacture, or composition of matter, which largely agrees with your broad strokes (for instance, you can patent a particular new algorithm to rank search results by relevance, but not the general concept of ranking search results). Copyright law is different: you only have copyright on a fixed, tangible expression (for instance, a particular painting, book, or piece of software), not of an idea—see the actual statue quoted below, which expressly prohibits copyright protection for ideas. Someone else can write their own software that does exactly what yours does without violating your copyright, as long as they don't use your actual source code in the process. The idea doesn't matter, the code does. In the original ConnectU/TheFacebook case, the Winklevoss twins claimed that Zuckerberg had taken actual computer source code they had given him to build ConnectU (which is a tangible expression that they had copyright in) and used it to build TheFacebook. Essentially, this allegation wasn't that he copied the "Harvard prestige" idea or something conceptual like that—it was that he stole their actual, concrete computer code. (They also alleged a trade secret violation and a breach of contract, which are separate areas of law entirely). The case settled without going to judgement, and then there was a later fraud case about how the shares were valued. All of this is without getting into trademark law, which is a whole other can of worms. 17 USC §102: “Copyright protection subsists, in accordance with this title, in original works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression...In no case does copyright protection for an original work of authorship extend to any idea, procedure, process, system, method of operation, concept, principle, or discovery”

Thoko

I think it is important to know that although this movie is very entertaining, this movie is propaganda. It was based on a book written by Eduardo Savarin, Marks former best friend. He was much more of a problem than the movie portrays and there was no legal way to get rid of him. So the plan that the others came up with was to just cancel his shares and force him to sue them. That way he just gets money and can no longer continue his tantrums. Also, the main girl from the start of the movie does not exist. Eduardo invented this girl just so that Mark would look worse than he actually is. The reason why this movie got made is because Facebook destroyed the profitability of the big media companies. The same companies that own the newspapers and cable news channels, own many of the Hollywood film studios. So they wanted to bully Mark.

REDR58
>>131143264

It’s essentially an unauthorized biopic, based on an unauthorized book.

Grand Moff Slackin'

George has been, and will continue to be, my perfect 1600 on the SAT.

Crew Glove

If I may, I would suggest looking into "Steve Jobs" with Michael Fassbender (not the Ashton Kutcher one) as another character study of a complicated tech icon.

Thoko
>>131022702

Speaking as an African person with ADHD who is gifted at maths, I think the criticism you describe is all misguided. In high school I was confronted by an angry teacher when I scored way above the expectation for our age group when our school was forced to do state wide testing. Since it was more similar to that SAT style of testing and not based on what the teacher had been talking about the previous month, I scored extremely high and shocked the teachers who thought I was some dumb brat. But instead of having a conversation with me, my english teacher confronted me and started making threats of expelling me from school. They had a counsellor at the school but I was never sent there for this, which is crazy. So I only got diagnosed and medicated 20 years later after the damage was done. Also, when I got all the answers right in a math test I would lose like 5% or 10% of the test grade as a punishment for figuring out my own way of getting the correct answer instead of listening to the teacher and doing it that way. So even though I am so good at maths that I am currently writing a scientific paper on how to improve the underlying science of AI, I have nothing on paper from any school to say that I am good at this. The education system does not give a damn about my ability so I can't really get any recognition or use it to get a job.

Flerb

It's hard to remember just how crazy cool and different it was to have facebook in the beginning during college with how enshitificationed it has become. A guy down the hall in the dorm sent me an invite in fall 2004. It was the dawn of a new era and you could feel it. I think the beginning of this movie with Trent Reznor's soundtrack REALLY captures that feeling of anticipation of what was around the corner. But then of course it's devolved into ads and flat-earthers 2 decades later. Yet I still forged many MANY friendships and even met my wife because of facebook. I have a love-hate relationship with the platform for it's utility and it's toxicity.

olly.enn

It's probably just my OCD talking but I found that you often don't line up the video of the movie in the background correctly with your commentary. I get weirdly precise when syning it up to my copy (frame accurate) and you seem to be reacting to stuff to early on quite a few reactions. :) No biggie I guess but it kinda irks me to have my copy of the film run a second ahead of your video. Am I alone with this?... Hello...? ANYBODY? aarrrghh.... ( ;) )

Hussain Rumaih

Simone, when i gave birth i didn't even push i was blazed out smoking bomb kush

Thoko
>>131215169

In my experience, flat-earthers are a nothing burger in terms of toxicity. Sure they have some dumb ideas but based on what I've seen its more like a bunch of frightened people with a mental illness. The real problem online is the people who feel its their moral duty to save humanity, from the comfort of their mom's basement. And they change the definitions of words so they can accuse you of violence.

Thoko
>>131220124

Hi, I noticed this too in several of their reactions. And I think I know what the issue is because of what George said in another reaction. He saw an incorrect word in the subtitles, before the character actually said the correct phrase. He is seeing the dialog before us, because he is using subtitles. And the reason he is using subtitles is probably because he wants to avoid missing the dialog when either of them are talking over a movie/show.

James O'Sullivan

Not sure if this is the right place. But can I suggest an incredible documentary film called "Spotlight". Difficult subject as it's about a newspaper uncovering the horrendous actions of Catholic priests. But despite it mostly consisting of people talking in a room, the film is incredible.

Starman Deluxe

I feel like Silicon Valley would be a perfect show for this channel

Oscar Juarez

one of my all time faves, so happy you guys got around to watching it

Opti_Frog
>>131273311

I agree that the film is excellent, but it's not a documentary. It's a drama based on actual events.

Vig

oh YES! I didn't know you were going to watch this one! It's one of my favorites ❤️

LazyArtist

George, at least now you know how you got the rash.

Amelie W

I guess the fall from grace started in 2016, when it came out Facebook practically gave away all the user information they could to Cambridge Analytica to enable them to get Trump elected with a campaign of suspiciously well targeted ads. (And that's who you exploit in order to make billion dollars with a website; the users.) I figure if you ask Zuckerberg now he'll still say he thinks that was worth the price of making Facebook culturally irrelevant. Sure makes the movie an interesting portrayal of a super specific period of time, anyway. As someone for whom $4 million represents about 250 years' salary, it's hard to imagine jumping off a bridge because you only have millions in the bank and not billions. Imagine dying just for the sake of your own insatiable greed. As to the Winklevoss twins, it's hard to sue someone over an idea with no copyrightable work behind it, but if you're lying in writing with such obvious fraudulent intentions - where he's keeping the twins thinking he's doing the work he promised them so they won't go and find someone else for as long as possible - and then go on to make billions of dollars, I think you deserve to pay.

Brad Lowry

Ask a great Canadian company about who's idea is who's... How much did Blackberry lose in it's "it was my idea" lawsuit...

Jenny MacRunnel

I started using Facebook in 2009. A lot of my different real-life social networks at the time were starting to use it (parenting groups, my scrapbooking group of friends, and other coaches in kids sports) and it was just easier to keep up with everyone on that site. I do remember how it changed, I think it might have been around 2013 or so that your feed started to change to stuff you didn't care about, and it just got worse every year after. I'm still on it, but I rarely look at my feed. I post pics for family members that live far away, and I have a few reading groups and crafty groups I'm in that use it. I feel like its definitely more for older people now, not the younguns. (My kids are rarely on it, they are 21-28 years old. ) This movie is fascinating to watch, even if its not completely accurate. And I love Andrew Garfield and Jesse Eisenberg.