Home
Creators
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register Favorites Keys Review DMs Logout
Community
Telegram ThePornDude
Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

EARLY ACCESS: Invincible 3x3 FULL REACTION (Patreon)

Published:
2025-02-12 00:34:06
Imported:
2026-06
Tags:
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Content

LINK: Invincible 3x3 FULL REACTION

Full Length Uncut: Invincible 3x3

  • Note: The uncut version is for testing purposes and is not a permanent addition at this time. 

  • The uncut will be up for 48 hours 

 Format: Watch along (Have your copy to sync)  

Why is it blurred? Copyright laws. We do not own this movie property nor can we afford the rights to distribute  

First watch: All  

Watched on: Amazon Prime  

Invincible watch options here

Thank you and hope you enjoy

Files

Previews only

Comments

Thepuppetmasta

Yeh i simply dont understand what the point of that intro was or why they brought back Amber 😅😅 Hopefully at minimum the intro comes back in a later episode like the father and his son in the first 2 episodes of season 1 and the tomb sideplots in s1 and s2 But just felt very strange and off to have as an intro.. just filler for the monent

Dillon

Appreciate the bad medicine crew the churn outs for new series regular series the gaming content (lives included) y’all been killing it!

Conor Moriarty

shout out to oak getting triggered by wine tastings lol., cue shane - "what is that!"

William

I believe that Invincible was greenlit for a 4th and 5th season last year

MynamecouldB
>>164404213

The intro shows that not all villains are evil. Some try to do good but their circumstances in life lead them astray. It's part of the conversation of redeeming villains and that they are capable of change. This is the conversation that's happening between Cecil and Mark, and between Mark and Oliver.

Thepuppetmasta
>>164404213

Yes i know what it means... and how it relates.. heres the issue.. we already had that with Cecils storyline.. we dont need another retelling of it with 2 characters nobody cares about. It was filler for the sake of filler. Cecils backstory was perfect enough.. they couldve used the opening for something else entirely

Denver Gray
>>164404213

There is a distinct difference. Cecil's argument is logic against Mark's emotion. This intro's argument is emotion against Bulletproof/Mark's logic. Completely different arguments arriving at the same conclusion...not everything is absolute/black and white.

Denver Gray
>>164404213

Better for you it seems, which is great. Personally, while I understand Cecil just fine, his whole backstory made me agree with him slightly less. The argument in this intro is more honest and convincing to me, so it was necessary.

Thepuppetmasta
>>164404213

Cecil is in the right though.. Mark and the teen team acting on feelings.. Cecil is acting on what needs to be done.. its not about your feelings in war, its about warriors. In all of history of War, its always been about breeding the strongest forces.. Mark is against that