Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Videos

  • 747838568.mp4

Downloads

Content

Files

Comments

Jim Nasium

Yeah.... 41 minutes.

Jim Nasium

At the core Petrov was just a scientist. So for as long as he has been one seems like he sees everything as an experiment. Only difference is at the end in his old age he "may" have seen these kids more that just an experiment because the interactions wasn't in a dark orphanage but in a normal environment where kids can act normally. Doesn't redeem him though lol Also there's the classic argument of boys are more suceptable to being aggressive and easily manipulated into acting out that aggression. But there's so many factors in play such as hormones and what is the world considered to be the social norms for how boys/men should act and behave.

WondrousMay

You aren’t wrong about Grimmer being a spy! He told the guy at the newspaper office that he was a spy working undercover as a journalist in the previous episode. I also agree that Petrov isn’t redeemable. I find it terrifying that he’s working with children again. Even if he changed his method, there’s no excuse for him after all the experiments he did on them in the past. Glad to see Grimmer getting so much love from you! He’s such a wonderful character. Also love your theories about the woman that looks like Anna. So much intriguing stuff!

Dr Sophie Darling Reacts

Was still an experiment to compare and contrast the results so it makes you wonder - if the results back in Kinderheim 511 weren't successful in his eyes would he have replicated the results with these boys to again compare with his past? He shouldn't be around children as he cannot be trusted. He may have saved them from the Red Light District but he also took advantage of women in desperate situations which makes it seems all the more sketchy. Why not go through the formal process if he truly wanted to give a child a better life? >.> Yeah, unfortunately an outdated concept. Childhood socialisation is huge which is rooted in gender expectations. Boys are taught they need to be strong , stoic, assertive. Violence is normalised in certain contexts. Girls are taught they need to be kind, nurturing, empathetic. To not react with violence but words. Gender norms are so detrimental in restricting boys and girls because in order to 'fit in' they have to adhere to what society deems as the 'norm' for each gender which is ingrained into all of us from a young age. My research delved a lot into childhood socialisation and violence so it's a topic I enjoy haha!

Maj

Good opportunity to flaunt the profile picture, WHAT A MAN YOU ARE GRIMMER