Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

I finally got a copy of William Eggleston's Guide yesterday, as well as Simon Stalenhag's Tales From the Loop. They are both fantastic works of visual art; Tales From the Loop has the added bonus of being an incredible sci-fi story told through an unexpected narrator.. I adore both, and they already are sources of inspiration, which I'm sure will only deepen on further readings. 

It has led me to a weird introspective place, however; I know when I look at an Eggleston photo, it is deeply compelling. I can list some of the things that elevate it above other work, and some things cannot be categorized, but I know that there are processes of framing and light and thought that make it masterful. Every shot comes with an instantly-conjurable story associated with it that demolishes the line between staged and candid in a way that cannot be described. I can't do that with my own work; I'm too close to it. There is no story because I know what happened: I was there, and I saw a picture, and I took it.

And it's led me to this strange place where I shoot because I must—quitting photography might be the only thing harder for me than quitting smoking, and I've tried more times to quit photography—but I can't tell if my work is good. I can recognize the references and homages to other artists I admire, and I can tell you technically whether a shot is good, but I'm so close to my own work I can't tell if it's good until months if not years after the fact. 

Largely, most of my work from about the beginning of my photography hobby at age 13 to about the age of 25 is not very good. It's lit right or whatever but it's boring; pictures of things with no theme and backgrounds that are just backgrounds rather than part of the composition. I of course did not realize this at the time, and blissfully just kept shooting away. There are random flashes where excellent photos occur, but they are rare and I ascribe them as much to chance as I do to skill.

It has left me in an odd kind of terror about my work today. This shot, which I took in June, I think is good right now. The mountain is objectively stunning; the red truck and the lush green forest and the orange rock all appear to work in a way that looks like the world color-blocked for me. The weather worked wonders, as well. But it's also just a landscape with a truck. There's nothing exquisitely timed or deeply intimate about it; I cannot imagine it conjuring a story or inspiring someone, and so I wonder if I will eventually tire of it and think it's bad, just like the shots I took the first 12 years I held a camera. 

I don't know whether that thought should excite or frighten me.

Files

Comments

Gemma Watson

There is a school in photography that is so obsessed with unobtainable technical perfection that they have stripped the joy from the art. Pretty is just fine, more than just fine, it’s the most important part (and It’s often technically adequate), because it feels good, it makes the beholder feel good, and for me that’s is far more important than pleasing the joyless pixel peepers (the same folks who spend their lives complaining in DP review comments sections). I think it’s because you are immersed in your work, and it is inspired by powerful aesthetics that make your images so enjoyable. A lot of them are technically very good, but on the fundamental question is it better to be pretty (and joyous) it technically perfect (and soulless) I know where I would rather be. Your photos are great, and I say that as the daughter of a press photographer and the sister of a pro who has spent her life fighting to keep the feel, and not let the perfection steal the joy.

Tran Girlismo (& Victoria Scott)

This is honestly a really good perspective to remind myself of, thank you so much. I really do enjoy doing it, and I should hang onto that more often.

Mark Kinney

That is a beautiful photo! There is so much interesting but muted detail and varying splashed of color throughout: the light greens of the grasses, the dark greens of the trees, highlighted by the yellow flowers, orange in the mountains, the fog ... and of course the strip of road and the red truck. I don't know how much was intentional, but it all works!

Tran Girlismo (& Victoria Scott)

It was a combination of a spot I’d really wanted to shoot (planned), a very pretty truck (pretty lucky), and the most stunning weather I’d seen ever out here (SUPER lucky). Thank you so much, I’m glad you like it!!

Gemma Watson

There is a person I follow on pixelfed, (though the account looks like a general mastodon instance) - mulinarius@berlin.social I think he shoots fuji, it’s all urban and public transport and funky low angle stuff, joyous pretty and technically stunning if you feel like a little inspo now and then, definitely a couple of things I’m going to play with next time I’m in a city