Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

I took this shot last year in the midst of the incredibly bad week of wildfire smoke that Reno got (AQI 600+ for days; it was horrifying). This shoot day was the final inspiration that got Postcards moving, even though I didn't use this shot in the narrative. (Although a tiny sliver of this shot is actually visible in the cover of Postcards.) It was only cut from the story because I was attempting to make the narrative of Postcards less time-constrained, and the truck felt too specific and distracting from the overall narrative of the piece for me. 

Which brings me to the crux of my writing today, and this is more of a question than a post: what does define the correct vehicle for post-apocalyptic/dystopian media? I think I've mostly seen the default be "old muscle cars", likely because of Mad Max. The thing is, the Interceptor is just a '73 Falcon because the movie came out in '79. The equivalent car today would be, like, casting a pre-facelift S550 Mustang.

Simon Stalenhag usually uses 80s-90s era vehicles in his stories, but those stories also tend to be set explicitly in the era the cars are from (which is part of why his genre of lost futurism is so interesting, admittedly). Looper actually did something fairly interesting, at least conceptually, with its dystopian future where Joseph Gordon-Levitt has his somehow-wire-modified NA Miata in a world with a combination of many old pre-OBDII cars and futuristic vehicles. Minority Report just got a big-ass check from Lexus and threw a concept directly into the movie, which makes sense for its high-gloss dystopia and automatic pod-cars. 

Blade Runner has the Peugeot, which is the most imaginative future of all: an America where we can buy French domestic marques again. 

Of course the reason why I ask this is because I am yet again planning to go out and shoot some more dystopic photos that mirror how I feel about being alive, here, in Idaho, in 2023, as myself. If I could get the Peugeot from Blade Runner I totally would, but that has proved unfortunately difficult. I am simply grappling with how to portray the correct image of an ending world and still include a car; why does an '89 Camry feel like it fits, but an '08 Yaris doesn't? If I can figure that reason out, can I circumvent it? Can I broaden the scope or narrative in some way that it feels like a Yaris could be running around after the end of the world? Is my vision of the apocalypse solely driven by the media I have consumed; do I need to imagine something broader and newer? 

I don't have any answers right now, but I thought it couldn't hurt to write it out. 

Files

Comments

Graham

Good prompt. I feel like the “correct” vehicle depends on the flavor of apocalypse? Like, past a certain point of infrastructural degradation, it feels like motorcycles become more practical than cars

Tran Girlismo (& Victoria Scott)

This is a really good point; an adventure bike is probably the best mode of transport you're finding if the pavement is cracked and the bridges are crumbling. (Which to be fair, we're not far off of currently, lol)

Chiaki Mitama

For whatever reason, this made me think of the Disney TV movie Zenon: The Zequel (2001), and how in that world, in the year 2051, the only cars that were driving around earth (mostly because of sponsorship) were a fleet of jazzed up New Beetles. That, what if, had that world come to an apocalyptic end, the only cars that roamed the wastes were dusty bulbous New Beetles. That all said, I wonder if the roundness of a car contributes to how gritty it can look. A new Beetle trudging through the desert seems comical because it is round and friend-shaped. It can't possibly be menacing in a Mad Max movie no matter how many flamethrowers you attach to it, it will only become camp. An 89' Camry, on the other hand, plays into our aesthetic ideal of collapse, harshness and grit. The car has corners and feels rustic.

Interurban Era

My most thoughtful response on this from many years of pondering this question myself would be: older cars with the absolutely highest production numbers in the lowest attrition rate. So a lot of Toyota production system cars of the late 80s in early '90s, a bunch of 60 stuff that's easy to repair, a handful of 50s and earlier vehicles that are just so mechanically simple they wouldn't break. Wouldn't break. And then overbuilt items like first generation minivans like the Ford aerostar or the Plymouth Voyager that just don't die. I would also probably imagine that there's a whole sub genre of engine swapped more modern things that have all the plastic stripped of them replaced with crude metal bumpers and other things as things are irreplaceably broken.

Tran Girlismo (& Victoria Scott)

This is absolutely hilarious that Disney made a movie with New Beetles as apocalypse cars, as they didn't even last a decade thanks to VW electronics of the early 00s lmao. I really like your point about the campiness of mid-aughts stuff though, I really think you're onto something. It is funny because I can definitely imagine an Ioniq5 in the apocalypse much more easily than I can, say, a Chevy Venture, and that stylistic edge vs. bubble reasoning is likely why.

Tran Girlismo (& Victoria Scott)

The funniest version of the tech breakdown I've seen is the background R32 Skyline in Mad Max, where they coated the car in repainted motherboards as armor https://madmax.fandom.com/wiki/Nissan_Skyline_R32_%22Caltrop_no.2%22 But I agree completely, I think the technology is harder to imagine surviving, but also, early OBDII is super straightforward; I could imagine some Fits and Yarises surviving most apocalypses, I think. They just would look weird in apocalyptic media, and I can't determine quite why aside from bubbly styling.

Chiaki Mitama

Oh it was more of a utopic future where cars were all probably electric and self driving and the New Beetle was the only shape of car around, but it's my brain going "What if that world stopped functioning and people had to make do with that?"

Zack P.

I feel like we have to go pre-computerization of cars for any car to truly make sense, and then just whatever gets the best combo of space and mpg. So, something carbureted with a vacuum system and 20+ mpg, either a hatch or wagon if possible? I feel like a computer would be damn near impossible to fix in the apocalypse, whether it be in a vehicle or a PC. So, a purely mechanical and electrical system operated off of a battery and fuse system is what makes the most sense to me. AWD or 4WD would be ideal, but I feel as though settling for FWD would be an okay choice as well.

Tran Girlismo (& Victoria Scott)

I will say one thing in favor of electronically-embedded cars: as long as they’re not OTA updated or anything (so pre-2016 basically) then I feel like they’d keep going for a while. If our remnants of society can store and produce gasoline, they can likely recap a primitive ECU.