Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Files

Previews only

LIVE STREAM

Comments

Anonymous

It was my own research, piecing together facts that I have have plucked from quiet news articles. Type in 'coronavirus death rate under 45 uk", you will find that as of 13th May, just 401 people aged 45 and under have died in the uk from c19. Then statistics were released yesterday that 95% of patients who died had an underlying health condition, they mainly consisted of diabetes, dementia, copd, kidney disease and asthma. If you apply the 95% to the 401 under 45s who have died with Corona then statistically only 4 HEALTHY people will have died under the age of 45. This isn't in the news. This is my own piecing together of research. Of course 4 won't be the exact number but it will be there or there about.

Anonymous

Also under 65s, only 2666 (13 may) had died. Apply the statistic that 95% that died had an underlying health condition and statistically only 49 HEALTHY people under the age of 65 have died in the UK. It barely kills healthy people! Why the hell are they ruining the economy for such a small number. If you're vulnerable then ok, stay at home.. but most of us aren't, especially the children! Also I had that kawaski disease as a child.. nothing to do with c19 whatsover yet they are terrifying parents with it who are only reading the headline and see the photos of ill children. People around me are brain dead.

Anonymous

Exactly and why have we not seen 10s of thousands of people die in sweden with no lockdown, even though the mug neil Fergusson said 500,000 would die if we didn't. But of course the news dont want you to know any of this.