Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

Featured image: Béla's neon pink string cover

Bonus image: Dog with bangs

0. Introduction: Obsessions Convert Time Into New Connections

So say I'm working on a script about Emmy Noether, her life and work and etc. I steep myself in all the ideas and carry them throughout my days and weeks, so that I can stumble upon all the little connections that give me a way to say the thing I want to say, translated into life and metaphor and words. This is one of the ways I turn time into better videos, which is really the main skill of my job.

One of Noether's more well-known accomplishments is Noether's Theorem in physics, now sometimes called "the most beautiful theorem in physics" or "one of the most important discoveries in 20th century physics", where she stepped in to help Einstein and Hilbert figure out a point of contention with relativity and resolved the issue with something more amazing than anyone could have imagined could possibly be true about the universe (but that, as is often the case, makes perfect obvious sense in retrospect).

So of course I'm thinking about relativity, both as a physics thing and as a metaphor, and go through my days looking for connections that will help the larger idea of the video come across.

I like to stay aware that new connections aren't always true connections, but I create art, stories and metaphors where new connections don't need to be factual in order to add truth and meaning to the work. Relativity in physics doesn't necessarily have anything to do with moral relativity, for example, but we can still use the connection as a tool for introspection.

Not all of those connections will actually end up in the video though, so for today's writing warmup I'll mention a couple places where relativity has come up in my life as connected with memory, which is another topic on my mind because it's been a VIM LIVE topic recently.

1. Relative Calendars and the Re-Rescheduling of VIM LIVE

In my last post, I mentioned we were rescheduling VIM LIVE to Monday, instead of the usual Tuesday. And, come Monday, I entirely forgot. It was Memorial Day so I tried to be a good "don't work all day every day" human and took the day off to read a book, ignoring my phone and calendar.

I realized late in the evening, oh no! How could I forget! M must have left me a million messages trying to figure out why I didn't show. And usually an entire 2 people show up to watch so hopefully no one's too mad about it besides M, but those 2 people still matter!

Indeed my phone had missed calls and texts from M. Ironically, they were not wondering where I was, but apologizing for missing the stream. We both forgot! (It's now re-rescheduled for tomorrow, Thursday the 31st, at the usual 5pm Pacific)

I knew exactly the mental mistake I had made, though. I tend to think of my schedule relatively. I have a mental bucket for things to get done on the first day of the week, and usually that's Monday, but when Monday's a holiday the first day of the week is Tuesday, which is the normal day for the stream and thus did not draw any suspicion when on Monday I vaguely thought "the stream is tomorrow, Tuesday, the first day of the week". 

All the facts seemed consistent. Relativity is a great way to create the illusion of truth through consistency.

2. The First Time I Forgot Something

I remember the first time I ever forgot an appointment. I was 12, and when my appointee came up to me and asked where I was during lunch, I stood in shock.

I'd forgotten. 

How is that possible? How could my mind betray me like that? Who's running the ship, here?

Before the age of 12, I did not keep a calendar, and thought it a ruse that anyone did. When I was young, I simply remembered everything. I knew everything. I thought school was where kids pretend to be stupid so that adults can pretend not to feel guilty while they take advantage of free babysitting.

I thought "I forgot" was one of those socially constructed excuses, a polite "I didn't want to", a ritual as meaningless and essential as Santa Claus or How-are-you-Fine-thanks. A lie invented for the comfort of others, meant to communicate "I don't expect you to take action in acknowledgment of the truth".

I eventually started keeping a calendar. I even realized that young kids were not just pretending to believe in Santa Claus, that some people are actually fine thank you, that adults were not just pretending to believe in god, vegetables, and public education, and that I did not in fact know everything.

In fact, the older I've gotten the more skill I've gained in forgetting things and not knowing things. My progress is quite remarkable!

I still, however, believe that a good chunk of human communication translates to this: 

"We all know how unlikely it is that acknowledging the truth will result in actual positive action or change, so lets just get along and go along."

It would be good advice, if only it were used a little more sparingly. It depends on the relative values of getting along vs the risks and rewards the truth might bring, and to whom.

3. Relativity in Sight Reading Music

In the past month I've been working on another project in my spare time: learning to properly sight read music for piano. This is both for my personal enjoyment and in preparation for a series of mathemusical (and music theory/appreciation) videos I'd like to make in the future.

My childhood memory skills got me into some bad habits. My memory was good enough that all I had to do was struggle my way through the sheet music once, taking an hour to "e-g-b-d-f" my way though each and every note and then "a-b-c" my way though the piano keys to hear what it sounded like, and then I'd have it memorized forever, and only once it was memorized could I hope to possibly ever play it.

Then I learned some music theory, and once I knew my chords and intervals I could read music relatively, starting with the first note and then knowing "up a major third, down a fifth, minor chord in 1st inversion" and so on. I could find the next notes in my head using these relative intervals, and then play them by ear in real time, as long as it wasn't too fast or complicated.

This works great for vocal music, less so for piano where there's a lot going on at once and sometimes very large leaps or notes coming into existence out of nowhere in a new range. Still, combined with my still almost perfect musical memory it worked for my needs.

Imagine my surprise the first time I learned that some people play from sheet music not only without knowing how it sounds first, but in order to find out how it sounds!

4. A Ramble on Notation, Meaning, and Literacy

Now my brain is making up for its front-loaded memory skills. I can't memorize a long complex piano piece in a few hours, or even a few days. And I can't identify complex sets of intervals at the speed I used to. So I'm learning how to look at a note on paper and know where it is on the piano, without knowing what it sounds like, and it's super weird!

How can my hands play music without knowing the music? If it bypasses my ears and goes straight from my eyes to the keyboard, it's just noise-making. The first read-through of unfamiliar sheet music can't be music if it's not mediated by the human mind's understanding. Music exists only in the mind, and the rest is just dots on paper or buttons pressed. It's like copying the lines of an unfamiliar script without knowing what the words are until they're down and you see them. That's not writing, it's... something else. 

When we read text out loud we look at it, know what it says, and then say words, not noises. Literate adults don't first sound out the letters and then listen to ourselves to hear what the words mean.

(Although... there's a theory that back in the first millenium people did exactly that, and silent reading was an uncommon skill... which if we are to connect this theory with the musical analogy might explain why memorizing and then reciting shorter things was more common whereas reading unfamiliar long-form work was not a hobby until the last couple centuries. Currently, replaying known music is more rewarding to most people than reading through something long, new, and non-repetitive, like the musical analogy to the novel, the novel being a relatively recent literary invention, and the musical equivalent perhaps not being possible without higher rates of musical literacy. And as with novels, I often enjoy the version of a piece that exists in my head more than any production of it.)

But let us not take the analogy too far. Some musical figures I recognize as "words" but some aren't in the dictionary and must be sounded out first, whether it's only in my head or through my fingers. Sometimes the latter is faster, and that's what I'm working on learning to do. Luckily learning to sightread is a lot faster if your hands already speak piano.

Literacy is just the craziest thing. Pathological, when combined with near-instantaneous communication like our internet. Someday alien humanographers are going to be like "and here's the point in history where humans figured out how to instantly send their thoughts through the air to other humans everywhere. As with most telepathic species, they went extinct soon after."

Um. This writing warmup has gone on a little longer than I intended, but that's how we explore! Writing is a tool for thinking! Bye! Your homework is to write a comment about relativity in your life!

Vi

Files

Comments

M Eilo

The first thing that jumps to mind when I think about relativity in my own life is the constant changing status of my health. As though I were speeding through space and was periodically sped up and slowed down at odd intervals by invisible dark matter. My strength, energy, ability, pain and motivation all ebb and surge. But the relativity comes down to a comparison between two points. From my static point of view when I'm stuck in bed I am slow in a sped up world. From my active point of view I am a strong work horse able to accomplish great things. I move at speed with my world. These two incompatible yet tethered views are both correct even if I try and deny or hide the static status.

Randal Moore

oh--this is good and has to do with 'things I think that no one else thinks'. I will study this and plug it in to my theory drawer in my mind, and make a short relative comment long after you are in bed. (yes I have a many drawer mind--each drawer is labelled. Otherwise I'm lost. But if I'm not on a tangent, I'm lost....SO-----(sigh)

S Brackett Robertson

You asked for an example of relativity in my life but I may end up writing a poem about the first example so I'll have to think up a second example for posting semi-publicly on Patreon.

Andew Romaner

The sooner I start my homework after class concludes, the more likely I am to actually complete it. There are these short-lived particles called muons. According to Wikipedia they belong to group of three particles called charged leptons. Another of these particles is the familiar electron and the third is... tau!?! Oh my goodness, I'm so happy to be talking about this here of all places. Anyway, muons are useful in confirming one of the more uncomfortable consequences of special relativity, namely that time slows down the more you speed up. Muons decay at just one rate, very quickly. However, sometimes we can observe the decay of muons traveling at near-relativistic speeds and sure enough they decay more slowly. No, they don't though. At least, that is the wrong way to say it. They decay at the same rate but because they are moving at a non-trivial fraction of the speed of light in a vacuum, less time is passing for them so less decay happens. Our intuitive experience of times (and classical physics) informs us that this is impossible and yet we have experimental data backing up Einstein's prediction that this is the case. So, we have to live our lives with an epistemological asterisk of sorts. Our whole process of knowing about our world was optimized for the classical scale of medium-small objects moving low speed. This was the scale of the universe that we needed to understand in order to avoid becoming lunch for some larger predator, but that isn't all there is to the universe. We have developed instrumentation and notation that allow us to glimpse these other properties that really don't make any sense and while that might make the study of physics seem a little arcane, I think it is also really amazing.

Richard Kusaba

I take relativity to be synonymous with contextual. There’s a semi-famous pair of computer generated photos featuring the same color swatch looking very very different in two different environments. How something looks can often have much more to do with what surrounds it and much less to do with what it actually is. How it looks to oneself can vary very quickly depending on how one’s view of the context might change. So what does this have to do with my life? How I rate the pertinence or interestingness or wittiness or value of my thoughts depends heavily on the arena in which they will be seen. Solo, around the house here, I’m the best thing since Mark Twain or Henry David Thoreau. In a venue like this comment page, I’m babbling like Jar Jar Binks.

Perryman

It’s all relative. After 33 ½ years, I have come to understand myself as a chameleon of sorts. I blend in with my surroundings, and soak up information like changing my colours to fit my present environment. There is, however, a desire seek out new knowledge or new and interesting things. That is where relativity plays its part for me. I am, by nature, quite introverted and am often intrinsically motivated. At first, everything was new and interesting. I enjoyed learning mathematics, electronics, reading, computers, and games. Though the chameleon in me blends in to new surroundings and topics, information is its own sort of colour that I not only blend in with, but soak up like a sponge and move on to the next thing. Eventually, though, things become stale and I wind up moving to a new experience to soak up more unique and interesting ideas. A rainbow chameleon, perhaps. This comes in fits and starts. I think everyone has probably experienced this at least once in their life. I had an interest in puzzle games, so I played every single one of them for Nintendo/SNES. I found ever increasingly interesting authors from Orson Scott Card to Dianna Wynne Jones to Lois McMaster Bujold, and endeavored to read every piece of literature they wrote. I absorb them, and they in turn absorb me. Months and years pass by in the blink of an eye. This has the unfortunate side effect of flitting about from hobby to hobby, not for a passion for the task, but to learn the intricacies (soak up the colors) and move on to the next. I spent two weeks learning to knit because I wanted to know how it was done; I never finished that scarf. I own two recorders, a keyboard, and several guitars, and I love music; I can’t play any of them because I don’t have enough interest in learning the muscle memory to play since I understand how they work and others are already experts. How can I dedicate that time to practice when there are other things to absorb? Eventually, though, the older you get and the more you see, the harder it is to find unique, new, interesting ideas, information, and perspectives. Things that once used to interest you grind to a halt. Playing each new video game dulls and dulls you as you slowly realize they are just the same thing done slightly differently; what is the point? Give me something else. Something I’ve never seen before, don’t just mix the soup, add the spice! The days feel like years. Fortunately, I’ve learned that although I tend to be introverted, I’m significantly more productive pairing with other people working toward a shared goal. Some sort of purposeful creativity, rather than creativity for its own sake. Problem-solving creativity, and certain people help ask the right questions. There are certain people that enjoy soaking up everything in a similar manner. I am always delighted when I find a new one of these Unique People and enjoy the time I get to share with them, even if I can count them in two hands. They make life interesting. Interesting things are fast. Boring times are slow. In the end, it’s all relative.

Pimellon

Einstein's relativity, the tradeoff between time and space, has a nice parallel with the tradeoff between memory and speed in both electronic and meat brains. In programming, this is a well-known tradeoff. For example, we can get the same effect as speeding up calculations by pre-calculating results and storing them in memory. In human brains, this is something you mentioned in this post -- child-you memorized music instead of reading it quickly. Child-me was the opposite -- I remember my classmates memorizing pages of formulas before math or science tests, but I wouldn't bother. I remembered a few basic formulas and I'd redo the derivations whenever I needed them, because I was fast enough that I had time for that during the tests. In earlier grades, a similar thing manifested in poem memorization -- classmates would study it until they could rattle it off in their sleep, but I mostly memorized a few starter words and then figured out ways to make each subsequent part make sense as the logical follow-up, so I could figure out what came next when I got to it.

Michael Tiemann

Schadenfreude is the way to relative happiness :-/

Michael Tiemann

When it comes to the British Monarchy, it's all relatives.

Kenny Tilton

My homework. The manager of the team I had just joined had laid out his elegant three stage response to a run-time crisis on which we had just plastered a rather expensive monthly Amazon cloud band-aid. He asked me if it made sense, and I objected that it did not address the problem. He explained it again and asked if it made sense. I said yeah but it did not address the problem. He bravely explained the whole thing again and asked me if it made sense. I told him I would do whatever he wanted except say that it made sense. To be honest, I was not even listening to his solution because I was stuck at a higher level where all I could see was the problem not being addressed. Four very expensive months later management was breathing down his neck and I had found another job where the manager was much better so I did not listen to him because he was telling me what to do at too *high* a level. During one contentious public architectural throwdown I asked, "When do we write the application?" Pure deer and headlights.

Tom Nedimyer

lol, I definitely need to not read your posts while my students are taking a test. I find myself grinning like a fool, laughing-but-trying-not-to-let-it-be-out-loud, cocking my head to the side and staring off into space while puzzling through the intricacies of some of what you've said, etc, and then I look up and realize that one or two students are looking at me in bewilderment (and laughing at my facial expressions). Oh well, I guess that's how we bond, or something. Anyway, thanks for all the great insights into life, the universe, and the-mind-of-little-Vi.

Jonathan Millett

This reminds me of the disconcerting feeling I get when trying to translate a concept to a language that has no word or expression for it. It's like navigating a staircase in the dark, reaching out for the next step and not being able to find it even though you know it exists. You're left stuck holding the handrails in suspense and wondering why there is no word, if others know what they are missing, and how nice it would be to will something into existence to fill the void.

kpunkt klaviermusik

"Imagine my surprise the first time I learned that some people play from sheet music not only without knowing how it sounds first, but in order to find out how it sounds!" Haha, that's me :-) I prefer to play music I don't know. Of course, when I see the notes, I hear some sort of pre-echo of them before pressing the keys. But most of the time it's very surprising how it sounds in reality. An alternative would be to read the score without an instrument. But that's not as much fun as playing directly from the score. If you aren't good at memorizing (like me) and you're quite tone deaf (me again) - that's the only possibility to make music.

Mo O

We see the world not as it is, but as we are. To build on what you said about music only existing in the human mind, the same is true of all art. The fun part is that every mind sees/hears/smells it differently. I interpret art relative to my life experience, biases, and fears, but somebody else will interpret it relative to theirs and we'll end up with three or four different answers. But art only exists in context. Without somebody to see it and apply context to it, it's beautiful (maybe?) and meaningless.

vihart

Relativity as synonymous with contextual is a good insight.

vihart

I like "If I'm not on a tangent, I'm lost"

vihart

Ooh, I am very into the topic of Scale as applied to the human experience. Our metaphors and concepts for particles and particle behaviors outside our scale experience are so revealing. I'm particularly fond of "spin"

vihart

I like your chameleon metaphor. There's probably a name for that hump in difficulty between the beginner funsploration that leads to basic understanding of a topic and the time/dedication it takes to become good enough at something to reap the deeper rewards. My solution was to find ways to dabble in different related skills that add up to continued exploration of an overarching thing, such as breaking down "music" into dabbling in one composer or another, one instrument or another, one skill on piano or another, right down to specific techniques or a single section of a single piece. And in math, I can dabble in a field, a topic, a single number, and bring to it that feeling of fresh colorful exploration. Video making has given me a good structure for this, since the research required is basically a chameleonstravaganza in that video's topic while I'm working on it. And people are so great! I miss my eleVR team and the things we were capable of thinking together that I cannot think alone!

vihart

That's an interesting comparison. I think of memorizing music and memorizing formulas as completely different kinds of things, and I wonder if that's true for most people. Memorizing a formula implies you might not understand it or really know it, and school commonly has kids reciting lines of shakespeare without having the least clue what it means. I suppose one could memorize a set of notes in this way too, which in the programming metaphor is like storing each note separately taking up lots of space. But with music I always felt like I knew the piece, it was one single inevitable word, the notes compressed into some fancy data structure where you can't just go in and switch out a note or phrase. There's a piece I learned when I was a kid that I can still play, but only straight through from start to finish, and I can't play just one hand or just the melody.

vihart

Management seems like a job rife for relativity problems! Now I gotta think about the relationship between relativity and hierarchy.

Mark Harper

Perhaps this is my midlife crisis, expressing itself through a metaphoric misunderstanding of the relevant physics, but... My vague understanding is that due to relativity, a black hole causes time to slow for entities that fall towards it, as compared to those higher up, due to the curvature of spacetime imparted by its gravity well. All signals from the lower entities appear slower, all from above appear faster. Redshift makes a white light change from white to red to infrared, and finally to darkness just as the event horizon is crossed. It makes time appear to stop at that moment, and for the same reason. The ticking clock and the light wave both have their frequency reduced to zero. I sometimes feel that aging is like falling into a black hole. We all fall in, but at different rates. Those further along, below us, seem to slow down, and to become dimmer as their clocks slow and the energy of their light is redshifted towards blackness. We see them fade until time stops for them. Those above us seem to live at an accelerated rate, progressing and learning and communicating faster than we can keep up with. We watch the universe unfold more quickly above us, the further down we go. We watch the future, in a sense, but not our future. Ours is in the singularity below. Eventually, I imagine we could look up and watch the whole future of the universe flash by, just as we descend out of it. Makes me think that a close orbit around a black hole would be a swell place to build a retirement home. You could really see how everything turns out in the end! Thanks for prompting me to think this through. Very cathartic! And of course, completely fanciful and not meant as a model of any real physics in the slightest. Nor of actual aging, really. Probably the weird time acceleration effect I've noticed is just because I'm having a lot more fun over the past ten years :)

vihart

This is a great metaphor. I especially like how, just as "what happens after you cross the event horizon" is a misunderstanding of what an event horizon means for time and space, metaphorically perhaps "what happens after death" is also the wrong question.

Mark Harper

Indeed! "Why should I worry about dying? It’s not going to happen in my lifetime!" - Raymond Smullyan

Anthony Tamalonis

It took me a few days to finally read this post, but I’m very glad I did. Reading your story and history with sheet music brought back memories of playing trombone in school. Interestingly, I was quite good at cold-reading sheet music, yet I wasn’t a big fan of reading books. I remember forgetting completely about a jazz band audition once and being forced to go in cold. After the first few bars I stopped and told the panel I was going to start over. After that, from my point of view at least, the audition was fantastic and I was very pleased with my performance. There was only one other trombone player in the school, so it wasn’t exactly surprising when I took first chair, but that wasn’t what I remeber most. Instead I remember the thrill of reading the music cold, in front of a skilled and critical audience, and in my own eyes doing a very good job of it. Really, this was a long way of saying ‘Thanks, Vi’, for your story and everything else.

Alan Kay

Hi Vi Another way of thinking about sight reading (and since I'm joining a thread from 2018, and especially that you were a viola player in orchestra IIRC, you have probably already glommed this) is to see that there is a strong analogy between what happens when you read a bedtime story to a toddler. You are reading a bit ahead inside in order to be able to act out the emotions in the story. Similarly, in skilled sight reading, the player is seeing/hearing ahead what comes next, whilst in the audience's present the player is playing the memory of what was just read. The most interesting thing to me about both the reading to a child and the sight reading of music is that the look ahead is much more instant than the physical actions. One sees at a glance "what it is musically and knows how it will sound" and thus a fair amount of non-mechanical interpretation can happen at first glance. When I was writing music for theatre in my mispent youth, we had a rehearsal pianist who was miraculous at this (and lived up to legendary past sight readers like Liszt, etc.). You could give him a page of a "short. score" or a more fleshed out orchestral score and he could turn it into nicely interpreted music literally on the fly before the ink had time to dry. I never got this fluent. One thing which occurred to me about this is that most sight readers *hear* the music in their heads at first sight, and most of them don't play the notes to hear what it will sound like. I think the pleasure of sight-reading is "realizing" the music in the rich timbres of whatever instrument one is playing. There is an interesting connection with improv here -- which also requires developing an ability to look ahead whilst playing in the present. I learned to improvise before I learned to sight read, and found the latter paralyzing until I realized the similarities of lookahead and playing in the present in both cases.