Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

Here is the rough cut of the companion video to Always a Bigger Fish. It's missing credits, the audio is mediocre, and there's at least one slide I need to change, but it's mostly what it's gonna be in the final version.

I'll be doing revisions to this and Always a Bigger Fish over the weekend and hopefully releasing both early next week.

Cheers!

-I

Files

origins rough

Comments

Louis Brooks

outstanding work! i am pulling a ton of research and notes to help out a friend who is starting to listen to Candace Owens a lot . Hopefully I can pull her from the brink of the abyss, with these videos and the research links. Thanks again!

Sebastian

That was really informative and your research is very impressive! One thing I'd like to add: At 9:20 you say that "Most democracies have a liberal wing and a conservative one [...]" and although I do not have any studies about this at hand, I would say, that in many democracies (for example in Europe and South America) it's generally more a confrontation between a conservative wing and a leftist, usually social democratic wing, which I would not subsume under "liberal". Maybe that point of view ist too euro-centric or too pedantic in this instance, so feel free to disagree with me.

Brian Stodola

You should check out Corey Robin's work on this subject, it's definitely in the same line of thinking.

InnateOptimist

Well I'm definitely ordering Neoreaction a Basilisk. Excellent video :) looking forward to enthusiastically sharing it with people.

a wingless monkey

I remember this twitter thread. The video is really good.

The Art of Always Being Right

Awesome video! At 9:11 you say "their reactionary, accelerationist base". I know of accelerationism in a marxian context, how is it meant here?

Supererogatory = moral extra credit

I laughed out loud at Jordan Peterson. Also, at around 5:30 you mention the foundations of conservative thought and show three philosophers you don't mention by name- I recognized Leibniz and Hume, but who is the third unnamed philosopher you show? Is it Gassendi? I might suggest name plates.

Danny Stevens

Thanks for your labor and your thinking and the way you express your current conclusions and ideas.