Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

I mentioned earlier on Twitter that furries...don't really like ferals anymore. If you draw NSFW ferals, people are calling you a zoophile and putting you on blocklists and such--of which I'm a victim of as of late due to Hellish Delights.  Now, while Church, like most hellhounds, prefer to be in HOUND form, they're not true ferals; they can shapeshift.  However, that doesn't seem to matter to folks lol.

Would you all prefer if I continue working on Hellish Delights, or (temporarily) scrap it to work on some new comic project instead?

Comments

Cohasset Alicorn

It's dumb how often quadrupeds get autolabeled as zoo and beastiality even within the furry community. As someone who's natural 'sona form is a quadrupedal (but not what I'd consider feral) unicorn it can be tough sometimes to even find an artist willing to do a SFW picture between him and anthro/bipedal friends. Technically his anthro/bipedal form is to make it easier to interact with friends and because hands are quite useful. Ultimately it's up to you as it's been a fun comic but I can understand why you might want to just table it for the time being to work on another- or do both and just alternate between them.

lilythekitsune

Ultimately this. Idk where the feral hate suddenly came from. I can understand if it's a literal dog and not one that can speak and consent but they're suddenly lumped together. I don't enjoy bestiality, I don't draw it. I draw ferals who can consent. BUT for some people, that's still 'zoo/bestiality' and I cannot win.