Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Content

****Hey everyone, just a reminder that we are off this week so there will be no live show tomorrow. Though we are planning on unlocking a postgame in the next few days. I'm looking forward to catching some more World Cup this week and to planning upcoming shows. Thanks for helping make this community possible!****

For this week's reading, I figured I'd share a blog post we came upon in our regular search for new perspectives on the IQ question. This review of Siddhartha Mukherjee's work highlights many of the social factors surrounding IQ including its results but also in its popularity. Not only is the premise of IQ testing often questionable, but the questions themselves tend to reflect "the effects of contextual circumstances like poverty, illness, hunger, and educational opportunity." In contradiction to its objective premises IQ testing and measurement has proven to be much more subjective than its adherents are willing to admit. 

-David Griscom 


  

Files

Previews only

Genes and the Holy G: Siddhartha Mukherjee on the Dark Cultural History of IQ and Why We Can't Measure Intelligence

Intelligence, Simone de Beauvoir argued, is not a ready-made quality "but a way of casting oneself into the world and of disclosing being." Like the rest of De Beauvoir's socially wakeful ideas, this was a courageously countercultural proposition - she lived in the heyday of the IQ craze, which sought to codify into static and measurable components the complex and dynamic mode of being we call "intelligence."