Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Downloads

  • 376075847.mp4

Missing 1 full-res photo, 1 video, as this post has not yet been imported.

Content

Wendell debates the merits of protesting with a local activist.

Files

Previews only

Comments

Thomas Dignan

No. My answer the question at the end is a resounding NO!

HankyyyA2B

Oh dear it appears that animal rights protestors have reached Sodor

Kaidyn

No. Not really. Something tells me this guy is a lot like Tash Peterson.

Matty Harris

Before I begin my thoughts, just going to say that this is the quickest preview I’ve seen. 56 seconds before showing the question. Crazy. Anyways, no surprise that this is this season’s political episode, given it’s about the protestors and how they’ve been causing problems. Nice to see Wendell again, I did enjoy hearing the debate between him and the activist (Mr. Norman) and honestly, I agree with Wendell here. Here’s the thing, it is okay to protest about the important things. Fighting for Mother Nature, animal rights, maybe the Vietnam War since one of the signs said “Ban the Bomb!”? It’s great that activists are fighting for that and to improve the environment, treatment of animals and wanting wars to stop. But the way of protesting from what Mr. Norman is doing and going a little extreme, is not great at all. Throwing pig’s blood does gain people’s attention but it is still vandalism and hooliganism. It wouldn’t make any difference to stop things. It just causes loads of arrests and loads of violence. It does not solve anything, it makes things worse. Take a look at current protests like Just Stop Oil as a modern day parallel. Some of them are doing the same thing that what Mr. Norman and his activist group is doing. So no, I don’t agree with his line of thinking. His line of thinking causes more problems and less change. If they want to fight for change, then a peaceful protest is usually the best option. Brutally, I don’t really care about seeing this episode. I just hope that the rest of the plot has a good story and a good narrative behind it, similar to Diplomacy from a few years ago.

Andrew G.

I’m going to say no to that question. But what I really want to say is that way of thinking will bite him in the ass. I feel that the events in this episode will lead to the plot of “Adjustment.” I believe one or more protesters will be injured/killed and Joey will be involved or a witness. Whether he’s involved or not this will make him leave the police force.

Max Medaglia

No, I don’t agree with his line of thinking! He’s an idiot!

James Stavola

Norman’s line of thinking is a bit extreme, to be honest.

Kaidyn

She’s one of those crazy Animal rights activists that may as well be part of the ALF. Ask Victor. He may have heard about her somewhere somehow as she’s also Australian and has been all over the news multiple times.

Kaidyn

A lot actually. Let’s just say she’s a militant animal rights activist. Most recently she got sued for $300,000 by a vets office she went in and harassed. She does a lot of disruptive protesting. Think the just stop oil folks out there sitting in the middle of the road but on steroids.

Tacocat

Hell no I do not agree with him. I just hope he doesn’t end up like Mr Halifax from last season. I’m hoping this episode wills be good and not be a letdown like informant.