Home
Creators
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register Favorites Keys Review DMs Logout
Community
Telegram ThePornDude
Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Equation (Patreon)

Published:
2026-09-14 14:37:13
Imported:
2026-09
Tags:
Sam

Content

How big will she get? : P

Files

Comments

S

Uh oh…. To they 8th power? Damn

Azahar Centeno

Good… lord… Sam is going to be ungodly enormous. I wonder if Samuel will join her with that funny symbol?🥹

S

2.85x10^14 km?!?!?

TurboTails8027

I'm sorry. TO THE 8TH POWER?! This is gonna be ABSURD. (1441 x as big as the largest star!)

HK_808

19,046.86 astronomical units

Bebere

Welp, looks like Sam's going to be BIG ^^

Balina

Hey, look on the bright side, at least that isn't arrow notation! ...it's not arrow notation, right??

Tiny-Zane

Um... Big, very, VERY big

No Profile Picture

I did the math. 152^8 is equivalent to 284,936,905,588,473,856 centimetres. This is the same as 2.85*10^15 meters (almost the size of the Oort Cloud or about 0.30 light-years). One astronomical unit is about 149,597,870,700 meters, so Sam would be 19,047 astronomical units tall. At this height, the Solar system (measured to the Kuiper Belt from edge to edge) would be about 0.5% her size. That is approximately the same as holding a coffee bean in your hand. At that point, Sam would be about the size of the Stingray Nebula (between 0.6 to 2 size of the nebula) or just 50% the size of the Hour Glass Nebula. Unfortunately, she is only 7% the size of the Pillars of Creation (my favourite nebula). That being said, she would be about 10-15 times larger than the largest black hole (TON 618). Here are some other funny numbers. At 152^9 cm Sam would be 11x larger than the Pillars of Creation. At 152^11 she would be 10x times larger than the Milky Way Galaxy. At 152^12 she would be 9x larger than the Local Cluster. At 152^14 she would be 40x larger than the universe. Last fun fact: If Sam rotates the 8 it becomes an ∞ sign. Can someone peer review these back-of-the-envelope calculations please?