Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Downloads

  • Malevolent - Chapter 176.mp3

Missing 1 full-res photo, 1 file, as this post has not yet been imported.

Files

Previews only

Comments

S

Goddamn, that's a choice. At face value it's quite cut and dry, but when you take the whole series so far into consideration, it has... implications.

HeavenlyBibi

I honestly feel like if we choose to tell Oscar about the Order, there’s a likelihood that he will become a “disposable” character. I don’t think it will come to that, but there’s something in my gut that’s giving me that impression

Maddi

Oscar has already gone out of the way and put himself in danger to help us. I feel like we shouldn’t put him in even more danger.

Jess

We're back to manuplative voting question presentation. (And after only 3 questions presented more-or-less straight!) Curiouser and curiouser.

Abbey Toye

Interesting John is suggesting we bring Oscar in further but was upset about telling Noel. Of course it's not exactly the same information but still.

Igor

I think Oscar’s safety is out of question anyway- he’s already associated with us up to his neck, there’s no chance of playing it safe for him. His detective skills, connections and determination, however, might prove useful.

Megs

I think being upfront is the better option. The man knocked the Butcher unconscious, he has a target on his back no matter what at this point. We’ve definitely reached the point where hiding things is going to do more harm than good. Besides, with Arthur having made a deal with Scratch, stuff is going to come out eventually anyway. Might as well try to get ahead of it

Amy

Oh this is a rough one. I love Oscar and don’t want him to get hurt, and if it was me personally I wouldn’t tell him. BUT. The theme of this season seems to be opening up to and trusting others, so in keeping with that theme, I vote to tell Oscar

PrettyBoyDevito

Okay, I'm glad Arthur brought it up. So, I may very well be embarrassingly wrong here, which is very likely, but something about Detective Noel reminds me of Adam Fry. His voice when we first met him immediately raised my hackles. They both referenced the same line from Hamlet ("shuffled off this mortal coil"). And his little comment about how he's "golden"... idk, even if he has nothing to do with Adam, something about Noel has me on edge.

Jess

I agree. To add to that, here's what I noticed: It sounded to me almost like Arthur was justifying sharing everything with Noel after the fact, rather than having a good reason to give his trust. Noel says he and Arthur have a friend/friends in common and Arthur's only living friend (that we know of) is John. Noel is pretty open that Noel isn't his name and that he'll probably change it later. Aside being a weird thing for a police officer to say, we don't exactly have a great track record with characters who are very casual with their pseudonyms. If Noel is going to be Arthur's confidant, I'd he get a second human perspective to keep Noel from gaining too much sway over him.

Nicky

My theory is Noel is Charlie Dowd (Roland Cummings’ partner) and the people in common he is referring to are Akerman (book store) and Armitage (librarian)

Justin

I just feel like johns confusion about who people are is important. What if Parker was alive

Brandi

Justice for Alexander.

Nicky

As Jo perpetually advises folks on the discord who propose this: He dead