POLL: What do you think of this idea to factor injured players into per-game rankings?
- Good idea - I'd use it 82
- It's OK, but I'd just use TOTAL instead 14
- Bad idea - I wouldn't use it 4
For me, my two main issues with per-game rankings are how standard 9-cat doesn't give the best reflection of individual player rankings (my attempt for a fix for this was the H2H ranking type that I introduced a few years ago).
My other, is how high injured players or players who are projected to play less than 50 games get treated equally in per-game average rankings.
I've been tinkering with this idea for a while, and want to get your feedback on it:
The idea is to add a games played penalty that is only used when per-game averages is selected (it'll be grayed out and ignored when other options are selected). It would work by applying a penalty to the TOTAL score, which is used to generate the ranking order.
I'm still working out the details, but my initial thinking was applying the penalty to those players projected to play fewer than 50/82 games this season (Embiid etc.) and double the penalty to those players who are projected to possibly return before the end of the season and play fewer than 25 games (Kyrie, maybe Tatum?).
What do you think?