Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Videos

  • 549270520.mp4

Downloads

Content

Which would explain why this week's short is different. The TLDR is that it's not an amazing test- firefights just have too many variables to nail down- but we should be able to get some interesting data and make some comparisons.

Speaking of which:

Here's the graph from the video with the spoilers put back in. It might be a touch too small, but from left to right we have the Brits (Green), Canadians (Yellow), US (Light and Heavy in Blue) and the Soviets (Red).

So, at least by raw round-count, the Americans dominate at short ranges, while the Brits and Canadians don't drop as fast and retain rounds downrange over longer distances. Which makes sense... the problem from the SLR enthusiasts being that I reckon there are some questions marks around how effective that amount of fire is at that range.

That's a whole nother rabbit hole...

Files

Comments

Ray L

Good explanation of the rationale. I like the concept.