Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

Been thinking about violence in GOT.

In Game of Thrones Season 4, Daenerys crucifies 163 Meereenese noblemen, because they crucified 163 slaves. In Daenerys' next episode, Hizdahr zo Loraq argues that her crucifixions were unjust, because his (crucified) father was against the crucifixion of slaves. Later, Daenerys decides to kill all the Wise Masters in Yunkai, but Jorah convinces her not to – he says "It's tempting to see your enemies as evil, all of them, but there's good and evil on both sides in every war ever fought".

In Season 7, Arya kills a room full of Freys, to avenge the Red Wedding. She leaves the room with a triumphant smile, and the story never explicitly questions the justice of her massacre. But surely, like Daenerys' slavers, not all of these Freys were complicit in the Red Wedding? The real architects of the Red Wedding – Tywin, Roose, Walder, Lothar, Black Walder – were already dead. After the Frey killing, Arya befriends Ed Sheeran's Lannister mates, and goes north to her family in Winterfell instead of south to kill Cersei. So maybe that represents Arya rethinking her violent agenda? But as yet, there's been no real follow-up on the Frey massacre, and I suspect there'll never be – it's just meant to be a fist-pump badass moment for Arya the assassin.

Game of Thrones has always had mass killings – Robb's battles killed thousands of Lannister soldiers, Tyrion burned lots of Baratheon soldiers on the Blackwater, Jon killed wildlings and Boltons in his wars. And I don't think these guys get a free pass from the context of war. But after these battles, we saw the consequences of the violence – Robb was anything but triumphant after the Whispering Wood, and Talisa showed us the grisly aftermath of the Green Fork. Davos explored his grief for Matthos, killed by Tyrion's wildfire. Jon lost his love Ygritte in his defence of Castle Black. Violence had a cost.

But in the later seasons... Where are the consequences for Arya murdering a room full of Freys? For the Hound killing those Brotherhood boys? For Daenerys burning those khals? And cripes, I still think that Sansa feeding Ramsay to dogs just brings her down to his level. A lot of these arcs are about disempowered heroes rising up to dispense righteous justice on their enemies, and I can get behind that. But these killings shouldn't be joyous, or excessive, or indiscriminate. The heroes should follow the example of Ned Stark – "If you would take a man’s life, you owe it to him to look into his eyes and hear his final words. And if you cannot bear to do that, then perhaps the man does not deserve to die".

A Song of Ice and Fire is an exploration of the tragedy of violence, not a celebration of it. Hopefully Season 8 will remember that.

What do you think about the violence in Thrones?

Files

Comments

Harrison Hughes

It the words of a not so wise queen, I choose violence

Little Finger

As the hound say ''The world is built by killers''

Settlers of Natan

I think once the D&D start racing to the finish, a lot of what you mention has started to disappear. We no longer have small moments of reflection on the characters actions. Its just go, go, go to tie loose ends and streamline towards the end. I think this final season will be similar. Lots of actions with no reflection on what those actions cost to the protagonists.

Luke Bennett

I mean GRRM did say the story was supposed to be unadaptable and its not supprising that once they stray from the books they lost that shine. I mean my favourite thing about game of thrones was always the knock on effect character’s descisions caused. Robb marrying thalissa = red wedding, jon bringing wildlings south = stabby stab.

Luke Bennett

But its shame that they cant explore a bit more depth, the last few season feel so surface level and its pretty fristrating as a book reader but at least when grrm finally finishes asoif then we will have something else a bit more interesting

Paul Barry

In your dreams, ASX; in your dreams. I’m just hoping the storyline (assuming there is one) makes sense. Unlike Dorne, Braavos, Stannis, Beyond the Wall... I’d be satisfied with basic logic.

Kellan

Ned had honor and it got his head cut off, the ones who lie, cheat, and steal win.

Kenny Arnold

I really enjoy your perspectives Alt. I was watching the scene where Arya poisons all of the Freys with my girlfriend at the time, and afterwards she told me that killing Walder and the rest of the Freys made Arya her favorite character. In large part because of how much she hated all of the Freys after the Red Wedding. It seems like the show wants us to cheer for vengeance, but I’m not sure. I’m curious to see if any of Arya’s killing will damage her psychology this season. I’d love to see her turn towards a more noble life (like Ned) and abandon her list. Not sure if there is really time to divulge into that though.

gwiz665

While I love Arya, I sorta think the revenge killings will come back to bite her, maybe the Faceless God will come to claim her. I just hope they won't rush through everything like last season. and just become a violent clusterfrick. Battle of the Bastards was one of my least favorite episodes too, because it was all action and very little content, and the content that was there was dumb to me. To each their own, I guess.

Beth Morgan

I think you have it exactly right-- one of the ways that GRRM is so brilliant is in the detail of his world building, and showing the seams that most fantasy glosses over. You have an army? Great-- how do you feed them? How do you transport them? How do you make them weapons? How do their actions affect everyday people? As long as they had the books to work with, the creators at least touched on that stuff. Now it's just all a headlong rush to finish the story. And since I don't think GRRM is ever going to actually finish the story, there's something to be said for that. It's still solid fantasy, it's just not next-level fantasy.

Kangaroo Bob

Well said. It's incredibly sad what the series has become. If you're hoping for redemption in series 8 then I think you will be disappointed

Will Geffen

I've also been thinking about violence and the role that conflict plays in the series. Conflict between Men and the COTF breaks out and the COTF create the others to defeat the Men. This War eventually breaks down and leads to the Pact. But then Men betray the COTF and conflict escalates between Men, culminating in Robert's rebellion. At this point the Walkers return and the War of the 5 Kings begins. Although this war never officially ends, conflict is strife in Westeros & Essos. I think the Walkers were originally intended to eradicate all enemies of the COTF as a means of survival. Why they turned on them? Hopefully Bran will share that with us in Season 8.

Rookwood

I'm not sure I would use "The heroes should follow the example of Ned Stark". There are a lot of moving parts, but his decision to lie caused a ton of deaths.

Raph Leclaire

It's really unfortunate but not at all surprising that the show lost its brilliant narrative complexity without GRRM's involvement and source material. Everything that made it so unique - what distinguished it from all others, it's been squandered in favour of using every single TV/Film cliché and Fantasy trope. No more uncertainty of outcome, no more ambiguity of any kind... Only classic Good vs Evil, action driven narrative that gets to manufacture suspense by resting on the laurels of its past success. Plus some revenge porn disguised as "good guy justice" thrown in for gratuitous fist-pumping "Oorah" moments of empowerment. It's still entertaining as hell and I'll happily watch - if only to get a glimpse of how the 'real' overall story might end.