Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Downloads

  • 273654193.txt

Missing 1 file, as this post has not yet been imported.

Content

I found this archive for one of my Linguistic Courses at University while making space for new projects. We were asked to make a final video project about communication within an animal of our choice; my friend has a dog, so I thought, why not? Seems right up my street for a video project.

(I'm not sure whether the facts about communication within dogs are right; if you own a dog maybe you can let me know about your experiences with it haha, I was doing literature reviews and summarizing the interesting points I've found out.)

Long story short, the grading system was done in a way in which 50% of the grades come from peer reviews, and 50% would come from the professor, my friend and I got a final grading of B (21/30) for this video project with a comment from one of our peers' group quote "we do not think the overall video is interesting or funny enough.". For more context, professor gave us a (27/30) for the video.

We were not just disappointed, but also very confused about our peers' grading criteria lmao. An email to the professor did not render any response. But I still thought it was one of the cutest videos projects I've worked on, and it's not even my dog lol.

Comments

Minso

I took a psych/neuro class about language and I wrote my final paper about dogs too lol