Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Downloads

  • RR15-9.mp3

Missing 1 full-res photo, 1 file, as this post has not yet been imported.

Content

Simon, Iain and Grant discuss the fall out of Saturday's dismal display against Hearts at Ibrox.

They ask how much longer can this continue, and what next for a club that is seemingly on a road to nowhere under it's current coaching set up?

Files

Previews only

Comments

Michael

The way martin was being spoke to postmatch by fan media showed what his character was like, a thought he was going to start greetin. A rangers manager would be biting back and showing abit about him. Imagine stevie from 4lads talking to gerrard like that? He wouldny be back in the press room

Lindsay Bell

Shankland's goal correctly stood once the referee didn't call it in real-time. It's not the same as the 3-3 game in how the rules interpret handballs. It has to be either clearly deliberate, or it has to be the player who handles and then scores with no one else touching the ball, for it to be the same phase or VAR to intervene. H&H has argued so many times about pundits saying that "under the rules it's correct, but I don't agree with the rules". This is one of those times. Having said that, all three outcomes are just wrong. The biggest reason why RM should go at this point is that he's no longer trying to implement his vision. Whether you agree that that vision could ever work at the club or that he could ever implement that vision (and I've never felt he could, as he isn't half the coach he thinks he is - he's read about Pep and others' tactics but never managed to implement them), he's no longer trying to implement them. He's drowning and throwing shit at the wall, none of which is even close to working. So, giving him more time is pointless since that Celtic game, when he threw his entire philosophy/principle/vision out of the window.