Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

Files

Comments

Marvel Fan

I would say that this movie is fun, and the CGI effects look really cool when Johnny transforms into Ghost Rider, and the best part is Ghost Rider leaping into different vehicles, creating flaming detail which looks cool. There is a continuity error between Ghost Rider (2007) and this sequel. I think this is more of a reboot than a sequel. In the first movie, Johnny Blaze makes a deal with Mephistopheles, and he becomes the Ghost Rider, a spirit of vengeance bound to hellfire. The film ends with Johnny embracing his powers and seemingly learning to control them. The movie establishes that Johnny has a relationship with Roxanne Simpson and that the demon Zarathos is the spirit within him. In this sequel, the movie seems to pick up with Johnny hiding in Eastern Europe, far from America. It introduces a new storyline about saving Danny from the devil, Roarke. The Ghost Rider transformation looks different: more skeletal and armored, which seems to contradict the first film's depiction. Continuity error: there's no explanation for what happened to Roxanne or his previous life in America. The location change (from America to Eastern Europe) is abrupt with no backstory. The handling of Zarathos is inconsistent; the first film emphasizes Johnny struggling with controlling Zarathos, while the second film treats the Ghost Rider powers more as an a readily available resource he can summon at will. Two different villains: - Mephistopheles in the first movie, is the devil who makes the deal with Johnny Blaze. He is a classic deal-with-the-devil figure, manipulating Blaze and trying to corrupt him. He is named and central to the story's supernatural conflict. - Roarke in this sequel is introduced as a wealthy, mysterious, and sinister figure. He exhibits devilish powers, immortality, demonic minions, shapeshifting, which clearly link him to Mephisto's same archetype. The movie never directly calls him Mephisto. This was likely a creative decision to rebrand the villain and avoid having to explain all of Mephisto's backstory again. Why the continuity feels off is that the sequel doesn't mention Johnny's past battles with Mephisto much. Roarke's motivations are slightly different, and the sequel focuses on Danny rather than Johnny's first deal. This creates a continuity error, though it's more like a reboot/retcon of the villain's identity. Spirit of Vengeance ignores most of the first film's story. It keeps Johnny Blaze/Ghost Rider but resets almost everything else, including his relationships, backstory, powers, and mythology. The filmmakers seem to have treated it as a new starting point rather than a true sequel. The sequel had a different creative team: Mark Neveldine and Brian Taylor directed it, whereas the 2007 film was directed by Mark Steven Johnson. This often leads to subtle (or not-so-subtle) retcons in backstory or mechanics of powers. At the end, Ghost Rider's flames turn blue, which symbolizes purity, control, and a higher level of power. This reflects that Johnny Blaze has gained more control over the Spirit of Vengeance. Thank you so much for watching and reviewing this sequel.