Home
Creators
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register Favorites Keys Review DMs Logout
Community
Telegram ThePornDude
Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Early Exclusive - Are We Being Tricked into Fraud (Patreon)

Published:
2025-06-19 12:18:43
Edited:
2025-06-19 12:37:09
Imported:
2026-09
Tags:

Content

Early Exclusive: Second interview with Kris from LSB Film Production.Join Kris's Youtube Channel & Patreon Channel for more & Support.http://patreon.com/LSBFilmshttps://www.youtube.com/@lsbfilmproductions

Files

Are We Being Tricked Into Fraud? Companies House ID Update EXPOSED | Reclaim Your Legal Name

Are you unknowingly consenting to fraud through the new Companies House ID Update request? In this explosive episode, Carl, Alex, and I reveal what’s really behind the government’s latest move and how it connects to the legal fiction created by your birth certificate. 🔍 Discover how reclaiming the true ownership of your name can radically shift your legal, financial, and spiritual freedom. ✅ What you’ll learn: The shocking truth behind the Companies House ID verification What “legal fiction” means and how it controls your identity How your birth certificate may have been used to create a corporate entity Steps to break free from hidden legal constructs Why knowledge of sovereignty and lawful identity matters NOW more than ever 💥 If you’ve ever questioned authority, the system, or your rights—this is the video you must watch. 🔔 Subscribe for more content on sovereignty, legal truth, and conscious awakening. Follow and support Carl at Hornseywood Academy here - https://bit.ly/3Xae3E7 Follow and support Alex at https://www.patreon.com/DarkAcronyms1?utm_campaign=creatorshare_creator. ========================================== Please support the channel. Bank Transfer - Standing Orders - Only £1.00 a month! Kristofer Brooks S/C 11-07-77 A/C 10338063 For one off Donations https://gofund.me/15b68437 https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/KrisBrooks https://lsb-films.teemill.com/collection/new (Alternative Merch Store) CHECK OUT LSB - First look material! http://patreon.com/LSBFilms --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #CompaniesHouse #IDFraud #LegalFiction #ReclaimYourName #Sovereignty #Strawman #BirthCertificateTruth #WakeUpUK #CommonLaw #SystemExposed

Comments

Steve

Thank you all for this interview. I've gone through the enrolled deed poll and collated the definitions but your discussion gave me more clarity of what I'm actually trying to achieve and why. Plenty of other good stuff as well

suburbanmonk

Can one protect oneself under the clause of "Without Prejudice" whilst conducting oneself with the "Companies House" framework?

suburbanmonk

The explanation of who is responsible for not understanding "their" System is in-correct. @ 45 mins Kriss says, paraphrasing, "they are a bunch of criminals". A Contract is void if there is not full disclosure, period. On their behalf deceit falls under non full disclosure. By appeasing their behaviour is a Stockholm syndrome mind set and necessarily means one is feeling self inflicted guilt and making excuses for their deceit. They are criminals; they run a fraudulent criminal enterprise. This was pointed out in a video about a year ago when Carl said, "the BC is based in fraud on the notion that up until 9 months after the BC has been confirmed by a Christening Cert the Name for that 9 months is used fraudulently", hence a criminal fraudulent enterprise. It would be in-correct to excuse them for their deceit masked as mis-representation. Also the fact that very few in the Public domain even know about what is really going on, this would fall under the 2006 fraud act in their own hand writing.

Hornseywood - Truth Talk

one does not need to protect oneself 🙏🏽 one needs to claim one's name and hold the lawful/legal certificate that no one can use 🙏🏽 lets speak on the next meeting ❤️

Hornseywood - Truth Talk

mis-representation, non-disclosure and mistake in fact 🙏🏽 and yes it is a criminal activity but no one wants to stand and take responsibility on their behalf ❤️ lets speak on the next meeting 🙏🏽❤️🙏🏽

suburbanmonk

I listened to the vid. My question pertains to the meaning of "Without Prejudice", as CH tries to create hurdles and obstacles to try and make something that is essentially simple, complicated and entrap people via double speak. One cannot be held accountable in a court if one is protected behind the clause "without prejudice", this is what I am questioning. Is it possible to use this?