Home
Creators
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register Favorites Keys Review DMs Logout
Community
Telegram ThePornDude
Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Episode 709: Trump Indictment 4 (Patreon)

Published:
2023-08-20 05:45:39
Imported:
2026-06
Tags:
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Downloads

  • cd709.mp3
  • audio_preview.wav

Missing 1 full-res photo, 2 files, as this post has not yet been imported.

Content

Show Notes

Mostly from Trump's own mouth

Also will be posting the video shortly in a separate post. 

Files

Previews only

Comments

NSaneAtheist

Correction! The Georgia governor CANNOT pardon anyone! "That power belongs to the State Board of Paroles and Pardons. The restrictive system dates to the 1940s when then-governor Ed Rivers was accused of selling pardons to people in prison." Now the board is a 5-person panel appointed by the governor, but they dont take direction from the governor.

Cognitive Dissonance Podcast
>>115637076

Thank you. Though I wonder if they would just appoint always trumpers and do a big wink at a camera. In Illinois the Governor has the power to pardon anyone guilty of a state crime. My fault thinking that was ubiquitous.

Kelley G
>>115637076

Yeah, I think many don't realize how Georgia is different in that respect.

Doug Pettepier
>>115637076

My understanding is a pardon can't be given until 5 years after the sentence so the panel can't consider Trump or anyone else for at least 5 years.

Eric Denton
>>115637076

There are 4 states where the Gov can’t pardon. He picked the wrong one 😂

Stormy Decisis says visit sharebannedbooks.com

I can think of rare cases when declining to answer rather than lie is not enough. Because declining to answer can to some extent be an answer. For example if the president has launched a military operation that must be kept secret for now while it is in play, like the rescue of a POW. If reporters have previously asked whether a rescue was underway, and the administration could say no, then when they start saying I can't answer that, it would make clear that the rescue was underway. So, in very limited circumstances, I think it would be ethically appropriate for the administration to outright lie.