Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

Hi everyone! Tomorrow I will make this video public, but I wanted to share it with you now if you'd like to see it right away.

Welcome to Reading Latin with Luke, in which I read to you in Latin, and ask you questions about the reading, much as a teacher in a classroom. This video will help train your listening and reading comprehension, as well as your speaking proficiency.

Let's read Eighteen Roman Letters, edited by Theodore Horn in 1937, which contains selected letters by Cicero, Seneca, Pliny, and others. These letters were selected by Horn to elucidate to the reader important historical events, characters, and the lives of the Ancient Romans.

How you might use this video lesson:

1. Click or tap on the part of the reading in the timeline (labeled pars i, pars ii, pars iii, etc.) and listen to the recitation without looking at the text. Before I start asking questions about the reading, go back to the beginning of that part of the reading, and listen once again without seeing the text.

2. Listen to that part of the reading a third time, but now do so while reading along with the text.

3. Pause the video and recite the text aloud on your own.

4. Listen to my questions, and attempt to answer them aloud in Latin by finding the answer in the text. (You may pause the video if you need more time to answer.)

You may add or skip steps as is appropriate for your level. The reason not to look at the text, but only listen two times in a row, is to help your brain isolate key words. For people not used to hearing Latin spoken to them without immediate reference to the written word, this will be challenging! But that's the idea: it challenges your brain to understand exclusively through auditory input. Then, when you hear the same part of the text a second time, you'll get much more. It'll surprise you! By the end of the video, you'll understand what you're hearing far better than when you started.

No matter what your current level in Latin, this will likely present some challenge: not only do you have to get used to receiving auditory-only input (which is rare for anyone who works with an ancient language), but you will have to get used to the characters and events, my manner of reading, and also the Classical Latin Pronunciation if you are unfamiliar with it.

The result of this exercise will be much improved reading comprehension in Latin that you can utilize with any text you encounter. You may even learn to speak a little too!

Files

Reading Latin with Luke, Eighteen Roman Letters 1 - Cicero, Ad Familiares 14.1

Welcome to Reading Latin with Luke, in which I read to you in Latin, and ask you questions about the reading, much as a teacher in a classroom. This video will help train your listening and reading comprehension, as well as your speaking proficiency. Let's read *Eighteen Roman Letters*, edited by Theodore Horn in 1937, which contains selected letters by Cicero, Seneca, Pliny, and others. These letters were selected by Horn to elucidate to the reader important historical events, characters, and the lives of the Ancient Romans. *How you might use this video lesson:* 1. Click or tap on the part of the reading in the timeline (labeled pars i, pars ii, pars iii, etc.) and listen to the recitation *without* looking at the text. Before I start asking questions about the reading, go back to the beginning of that part of the reading, and listen once again without seeing the text. 2. Listen to that part of the reading a third time, but now do so while reading along with the text. 3. Pause the video and recite the text aloud on your own. 4. Listen to my questions, and attempt to answer them aloud in Latin by finding the answer in the text. (You may pause the video if you need more time to answer.) You may add or skip steps as is appropriate for your level. The reason not to look at the text, but only listen two times in a row, is to help your brain isolate key words. For people not used to hearing Latin spoken to them without immediate reference to the written word, this will be challenging! But that's the idea: it challenges your brain to understand exclusively through auditory input. Then, when you hear the same part of the text a second time, you'll get much more. It'll surprise you! By the end of the video, you'll understand what you're hearing far better than when you started. No matter what your current level in Latin, this will likely present some challenge: not only do you have to get used to receiving auditory-only input (which is rare for anyone who works with an ancient language), but you will have to get used to the characters and events, my manner of reading, and also the Classical Latin Pronunciation if you are unfamiliar with it. The result of this exercise will be much improved reading comprehension in Latin that you can utilize with any text you encounter. You may even learn to speak a little too! My inspiration for this video series comes in part from my colleague Adrian Hundhausen, author of the Pharos Thematic Guide to Ancient Greek Vocabulary ( https://amzn.to/3A5iVV5 ) who teaches Ancient Greek in this fashion. See our interview here: https://youtu.be/RjaPw7K_JJs The other source of my inspiration for this series is from my colleagues at the Ancient Language Institute who have taught me so much about Second Language Acquisition and paedogogy in general. I discuss how you can accomplish this technique solo with any text in this video: https://youtu.be/wpxfXiWqnlg 🦂 Support my work on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/LukeRanieri 📚 Luke Ranieri Audiobooks: https://luke-ranieri.myshopify.com 🤠 Take my course LATIN UNCOVERED on StoryLearning, including my original Latin adventure novella "Vir Petasātus" https://learn.storylearning.com/lu-promo?affiliate_id=3932873 🦂 Sign up for my Latin Pronunciation & Conversation series on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/posts/54058196 🏛 Ancient Greek in Action · Free Greek Lessons: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLU1WuLg45SixsonRdfNNv-CPNq8xUwgam 👨‍🏫 My Lingua Latina Per Se Illustrata playlist · Free Latin Lessons: https://youtu.be/j7hd799IznU ☕️ Support my work with PayPal: https://paypal.me/lukeranieri 📚 Luke Ranieri Audiobooks: https://luke-ranieri.myshopify.com Join the channel to support it: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRllohBcHec7YUgW6HfltLA/join 🌅 ScorpioMartianus apud Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lukeranieri/ 🦁 Legio XIII Latin Language Podcast: https://youtube.com/LegioXIII 🎙 Hundres of hours of Latin & Greek audio: https://lukeranieri.com/audio 👕 Merch: https://teespring.com/stores/scorpiomartianus 🦂 https://www.ScorpioMartianus.com 🦅 https://www.LukeRanieri.com 0:00 XVIII Epistulae Rōmānae, Cicerō in exiliō 1:51 pars i 4:55 pars ii 12:49 pars iii 14:52 pars iv #latin #ancientrome #romanempire

Comments

Alexander Abraham Perez

Looking forward to this one!! I cannot emphasize enough how awesome a service you are continuing to do for us Latin and Greek learners with series such as these!

Enrico Muzunna

Hi Luke, can you suggest me some bibliography about the nature of the accent in Latin (stress/melodic)? I read the chapter of Vōx Latīna but I want to go more in depth. The book Propedeutica al latino universitario says that there are two scholarships about: the French (melodic) one and the German (stress) one. I lean towards the German one, but the book says that it's controversial picking the one or the other: the stress accent conception is quite problematic because classical grammarians hereditated by the Greeks all the system accent without saying a word about the differences of the two systems, accepting concepts like circumflexus that haven't spaces in Latin grammar (I think, but I have no evidences, that the circumflex accent was used by grammarians, for examples, on stressed diphthongs because accent falls on the first elements of diphthongs, áurum, or aûrum 😅, but it's just my conjecture.) This is nothing like late grammarians, deaf heirs of a tradition mechanically learned. Nevertheless, it's still problematic opting for a melodic accent if we have no evidences in romance languages. But I saw your video about the h and of course it's a logical fallacy pretending that a linguistic feature didn't exist at all only basing ourselves on romance languages evidences. It's pretty complicated as you know 😅 and (maybe I'm wrong) I didn't find videos of you talking about the topic. Thank you a lot in advance for your patience! P.S.: what do you think about the book Propedeutica al latino universitario? I haven't read all of it (but I have to): I'm still at the beginning and I found a thing I disagree about (and you too): the accent of the enclitic particles (I saw your video about 👏🏻).

Luke Amadeus Ranieri

The Vox Latina section is the right away to go. The reason there is confusion is because Greek accent in Roman times was transitioning from one of pure pitch to pure stress; indeed, Greek accent is primarily pitch in Roman times but has stress characteristics as well, hence the Romans were able to compare their non-melodic stress system favorably with that of the Greeks’. I’m not familiar with that text.