Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Content

I'm sure some of you have noticed that, hey, some of my characters I sexualize more than others.  *coughcoughAmberJenniferDorothycoughcough*  Meanwhile, there's folks like Dina and Becky who honestly I only draw sexy-style for an audience.  

Lucy was another character I didn't really think of in "that way," and in early 2021, when she started her relationship with Walky, I was thinking, hrm, I might have to draw a Slipshine or something with these two eventually.  So, FOR SCIENCE let's draw an objectified, sexualized Lucy.  For science!  

science reasons

Long story short, from my hard drive: Objectified, sexualized Lucy, for science. 

Files

Comments

James Cano

"*coughcoughAmberJenniferDorothycoughcough*" sounds like someone has a type :p

Machalt

And then there turned out to be no Lucy/Walky slipshine after all, so the effort was wasted

Ty34er

Hehe, tiny boobies on sexy girl

C

As a fan of Dina, I will never object to art driven FOR SCIENCE.

James Cano

My wife looks like exactly like IRL Amber so I get it

Rubia

What hath science wrought?!? (sexy Lucy!)

damnyouwillis69

though if you can't tell in the strip itself, that's honestly a relief

axe11154

Have you ever thought to make altiverse slipshine like comics? like if walky and lucy actually didn't blow up, or if Becky and Joyce actually did have a fling just so they could "experiment"