Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

Videos

  • FM26 Hansi Flick Barcelona 2026-27_Fake 4-2-3-1 to 2-3-5 Recreation II TIPI.mp4
  • FM26 Hansi Flick Barcelona 2026-27_Fake 4-2-3-1 to 2-3-5 Recreation II TIPI.mp4

Downloads

Some files exceed the archive size limit and weren't saved: 2 files. Please note these limits are in place to keep this site running long term, without costing a fortune. You can favorite the creator though, certain milestones increase the limit.

Content

This one started from a very simple question: how far can we reproduce Hansi Flick’s Barcelona behaviour in FM26 without turning it into a META adaptation?

The starting formation is a fake 4-2-3-1, but that number really only describes where the players begin.

With the ball, the structure becomes much more aggressive. The best description for what happens in this recreation is a 2-2-5-1, with some phases becoming so aggressive that it is basically a 2-2-6.

And the season produced some serious numbers.

This was a full-season solo-shot: every match was played.

🏆 Season Results

✅ La Liga — CHAMPIONS🏆 Spanish Cup — WINNERS🏆 Spanish Super Cup — WINNERS🏆 UEFA Champions League — WINNERS

La Liga

104 points

34 wins

2 draws

2 defeats

137 goals scored

34 conceded

+103 goal difference

2.74 points per game

Full Season

61 matches

54 wins

2 draws

5 defeats

216 goals scored

62 conceded

+154 goal difference

88% win rate

And the season ended with a 2-1 win against Arsenal in the Champions League Final.

That makes this a full four-trophy season.

🔵🔴 The Idea: A Fake 4-2-3-1

Calling this simply a 4-2-3-1 doesn't really explain what the tactic is doing.

The formation screen gives us the initial positioning:

4 defenders2 midfielders3 attacking midfielders1 forward

But once possession develops, the structure completely changes.

The two centre-backs remain as the deepest line while the rest of the team begins to occupy the midfield and attacking zones far more aggressively.

That creates something much closer to:

2-2-5-1

And during the most aggressive possession phases, the separation between the attacking midfielders and the highest player becomes so small that you can reasonably describe it as a:

2-2-6

That is much closer to what I wanted from this recreation than calling it a conventional 2-3-5.

The important point is not forcing every screenshot into one perfectly symmetrical number. The important part is recreating the behaviour.

The Full-Backs Are Central to the Structure

Both full-backs are used as Playmaking Wing-Backs in possession.

That was intentional.

In FM26, the PWB gives me the kind of inside movement I want much more consistently than trying to force the current Inverted Wing-Back behaviour.

Koundé and Balde therefore aren't simply traditional overlapping full-backs.

They help create the internal connections that allow the whole attacking structure to move forward.

And their season numbers reflect that.

Jules Koundé

7 goals

19 assists

7.32 average rating

Alejandro Balde

6 goals

10 assists

7.15 average rating

This is not a system where the full-backs simply stay outside and cross.

They are part of the possession structure itself.

The Midfield

The midfield is one of the reasons this system becomes so aggressive.

Frenkie de Jong

16 goals

24 assists

7.43 average rating

Pedri

23 goals

16 assists

7.37 average rating

Those aren't passive double-pivot numbers.

Both midfielders become heavily involved in the attacking phase, which is another reason why describing the tactic as a normal 4-2-3-1 doesn't really work.

There are simply too many players arriving ahead of the ball.

The Front Line

This is where the system really exploded.

Raphinha

44 goals

14 assists

7.36 average rating

Ferran Torres

28 goals

27 assists

7.65 average rating

Lamine Yamal

27 goals

28 assists

7.62 average rating

Fermín

6 goals

7 assists

The balance between the three main forwards was excellent.

Raphinha became the primary scorer, while Ferran and Lamine both produced almost identical goal-and-assist totals.

That gives the system multiple threats rather than depending on one striker scoring everything.

📊 La Liga Performance

The league season was extremely dominant.

Barcelona finished with:

104 points

137 goals

34 conceded

103 goal difference

34 wins from 38

only 2 defeats

At home:

18 wins

0 draws

1 defeat

82 goals scored

10 conceded

Away:

16 wins

2 draws

1 defeat

55 scored

24 conceded

The attacking output was especially strong.

Barcelona produced approximately:

108.68 xG

33.27 xGA

87.87 xPTS

So we significantly outperformed both the expected-goal and expected-points models.

The difference between 108.68 xG and 137 actual goals is huge.

That doesn't automatically mean the tactic creates 137-goal quality chances every season. It tells us that the players, finishing quality and the overall attacking environment allowed us to convert the chances at an extremely high level.

And that distinction matters.

Possession Without Sterile Possession

Barcelona finished La Liga with around 61% average possession, the highest in the league.

Passing accuracy was around 90–91%.

But what I like more is what happened after that possession was established.

This wasn't possession simply for the sake of keeping the ball.

The Data Hub showed approximately:

23.4 shots per game

3.6 goals per game

2.7 non-penalty xG per 90

30.6% cross completion

around 0.9 xGA per game

That is the difference I was looking for.

Control, but still with a very aggressive attacking occupation.

Champions League

The European run was also very strong.

During the League Phase Barcelona finished 2nd overall with:

21 points

7 wins

0 draws

1 defeat

26 goals scored

only 5 conceded

The possession numbers also remained strong in Europe, with Barcelona around 58%, despite the very different level and variety of opponents.

And then came the final:

Barcelona 2-1 Arsenal

Champions League won.

Why I Prefer 2-2-5-1 Over 2-3-5

Initially I was describing this recreation as a 4-2-3-1 to 2-3-5.

After looking more carefully at the movement, I don't think that is the best description.

The second line isn't consistently a clean midfield three.

The spacing is much more aggressive.

The structure often looks like:

2 defenders2 connection players5 attacking players1 highest reference

That is why 2-2-5-1 describes it better.

And when everybody pushes into the final attacking line, the distinction almost disappears and it becomes a 2-2-6.

So throughout this recreation, that is the terminology I prefer:

Fake 4-2-3-1 → 2-2-5-1

Most aggressive phases → 2-2-6

This Is Still a Recreation

This point is important.

I wasn't trying to find the absolute strongest FM26 setup and then attach Hansi Flick's name to it.

That would be an adaptation.

Here the priority was reproducing the ideas:

aggressive positional occupation

full-backs moving inside

midfielders attacking higher spaces

multiple players between the lines

very high attacking occupation

wide forwards producing both goals and assists

possession used to attack rather than simply control the ball

Could some roles or instructions be changed to make the system even stronger in the match engine?

Probably.

But then we slowly stop recreating Flick and start building around FM26.

That is not the objective of this series.

Final Thoughts

This is one of those recreations where the results and the structure matched extremely well.

104 league points, 137 league goals, 216 goals across the season and four trophies is already a huge output.

But the most interesting part for me is the shape itself.

The starting 4-2-3-1 is almost misleading.

Once the possession develops, Barcelona attacks with so many players ahead of the ball that the structure becomes a 2-2-5-1, and sometimes effectively a 2-2-6.

That aggressive occupation is what makes this version of Flick's Barcelona interesting to recreate in FM26.

And in this run, it worked.

Very, very well.

Files

Comments

JP

like it - can you do Schreuder NEC?