Home
Creators
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register Favorites Keys Review DMs Logout
Community
Telegram ThePornDude
Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

LOL Jordan Peterson - EARLY ACCESS, AD-FREE, AND UNCENSORED (Patreon)

Published:
2025-07-01 17:54:12
Imported:
2026-06
Tags:

Content

Hi. What is the value of watching confounding word wizard Jordan Peterson debate 20 atheists? What can we learn from the intensely frustrating experience of watching one of these Jubilee "Surrounded" videos? We actually have an answer.

Files

LOL Jordan Peterson - EARLY ACCESS, AD-FREE, AND UNCENSORED

Hi. What is the value of watching confounding word wizard Jordan Peterson debate 20 atheists? What can we learn from the intensely frustrating experience of watching one of these Jubilee "Surrounded" videos? We actually have an answer.

Comments

scapeghost

What is this, a brief look at Jordan Peterson for ANTS?! It needs to be at least three times longer than this one.

GMS

It wants me to sign into YT to prove I’m not a bot. But the sign in link doesn’t do anything. Has anyone else had this issue and know how to solve it?

Grey

Amorphous fog is an apt description of Peterson.

BiggieCheese

Another brief look at pooperson eh?

Gretchen Hintz

I have seen an absolutely insane amount of videos responding to this Surrounded video. And now we just got the Candace Owens video.

John Ross

There internet has elevated those without self awareness on pedestals of horse feathers and bull fertilizer to become champions of those who roll in the same muck. It is one of the many crimes the internet is accountable for and perhaps one I wish a murderous AI decided to judge and topple those pedestals.

Steve Snyder

Fuck yah!!! I’ve been incredibly angry today, I think mostly just background reasons of living in the world today, I have no other real good excuse. A good “shit on Jordan Peterson” video always brightens my mood. Thank you so much!

Grey

Happy beard day, Cody! 🧔

Andrew Carkner

The most bizarre aspect of that Surrounded video is that they chose Peterson to debate on behalf of Christians. A few minutes of research would show he has a long history of equivocating about foundational beliefs of that religion, so it was inevitable that he would waste 90 minutes blathering about what the word "belief" means. There are hundreds of millions of actual devout Christians who would be much more entertaining to watch in this fake debate setup

Maria G.

Because some of the smartest of these liars are also incredibly arrogant, they tell us what they’re doing. For example, Russell Vought said his intent was to traumatize civil servants and laid out some of the tactics he’d use. The word game was described clearly by Christopher Rufo when he talked about how he was going to destroy the meaning of Critical Race Theory and turn it into a terrible, undefined attack on white people. It works because most people aren’t going to follow the commentary of known fascists and racists. There are too few of us willing to just listen while Cody and team tell us about it.

Andee Oord

Absolutely AMAZING video. I’m very upset 👍👍👍

Vanessa Walsh

Cody losing consciousness there is hilarious btw

Vance

Why is this not 3 hrs?

Victor Kivisto

I tried so hard to watch all the way through, but listening to that idiot talk made me so tired.

Michael Marquis Albright

I'm so sorry. I didn't make it past the first question; I can't imagine having to watch the whole thing.

Leigh Hile

"See this is the power that Peterson absolutely has. He knows words, he's a word-knower guy." Ok, but I am also a self-professed word-knower guy (/gal), and his words are so bad. They're like that famous Noam Chomsky sentence, "Colorless green ideas sleep furiously." You don't lose time turning over Peterson's words until you eventually come to the conclusion that they don't make any sense; you know immediately that they don't make sense, and you lose time trying to confirm with your baffled brain that so many words said with such confidence, in roughly the right order, could really be so devoid of meaning.

Vance

Can you define the word define?

Tim Auld

Why does Peterson keep getting airtime? He's such a waste of time.

Matthew Krumlauf

I was born in sin month! The first day of sin month! I am the first sin. Wooooooooooo!

Jez Bel

Screaming is a prequisite when dealing with Jordan Peterson. The man is reprehensible, and the proof is by his logic in the Nazi Germany scenario, the Jews only have themselves to blame for the Holocaust. What a horrible person.

Kerom Blum

Sam Harris has always had an uncanny vibe to me.

April Hughes

Hey you two! It's been a while. I wanted to let you know that my oncologist says I am cancer free. I'm one lucky duck. I had a few surgeries. I didn't have to go through what my sister did. My sister died and I inherited her American Bull Mastiff. We have five cats. It's been interesting. I just wanted to say I love you, awkwardly and from afar. Oh yeah...Cody if I send you my address may I have one of the pieces of paper on your desk. I'll frame it and make a shrine of it right beside my shrine to The Darkness. Please?

Andre

It's so wild that with everything, *everything* that is going on right now, listening to Jordan Peterson is somehow more exhausting than paying attention to the rest of the shitstorm. He's an emotional vampire.

Mulloy

It hurt to watch the first half of this episode. I hope you all got hazard pay.

Andy McCoy

I noticed Peterson also had the body language and facial expressions of someone desperately trying to intimidate whoever they were talking to. He looked every single person he "debated" had insulted his entire family line and he was about to get revenge or something. Even some of the tone was super threatening and yet every atheist just didn't seem intimidated. That seems to be a common through line here too. The performative toughness that never seems to actually do anything to the person they're talking to.

gijoes

another JP episode? you dirty little click whores edited to add: I didn't say stop

Expiatory Goat

From Gemini chatbot: Your statement accurately describes the harmful and racialist nature of reducing Hispanic or Latino people to "brown" stereotypes. This practice is indeed a form of scientific racism, with historical roots extending back much further than Carl Linnaeus, and it continues to manifest in ongoing discriminatory ways. Here's a breakdown of why your points are critical and accurate: "Othering" and "Brown" Stereotypes: Reducing a diverse group of people to a single color like "brown" is a classic example of "othering." It strips individuals of their unique identities, cultures, and experiences, lumping them into a monolithic and often devalued category. This simplification is inherently dehumanizing. Harmful and Racialist: Such stereotypes contribute to prejudice, discrimination, and a lack of understanding. They can lead to microaggressions, systemic inequalities in areas like employment, housing, and healthcare, and even violence. "Racialist" accurately describes an ideology or practice that is based on the belief that races are distinct and possess different characteristics, abilities, or qualities, especially so as to imply that one's own race is superior and has a right to dominate. Over 500 Years of History (Pre-Linnaeus): You are absolutely right to point out that this form of racism predates Linnaeus. The concept of race and racial hierarchies emerged during the Age of Exploration and Colonization. As European powers encountered and subjugated peoples around the world, they developed elaborate systems to categorize and justify their dominance. These systems often relied on physical characteristics, including skin color, to establish perceived differences and rationalize exploitation. Even before formal scientific classification, there were implicit and explicit ideas about the "other" based on physical appearance. Carl Linnaeus and Scientific Racism: While the ideas existed before him, Linnaeus (18th century) played a significant role in formalizing these categories within a "scientific" framework. His classification system for humans, which included varieties like Homo sapiens europaeus, Homo sapiens asiaticus, Homo sapiens americanus, and Homo sapiens afer, unfortunately, attributed not just physical but also behavioral and intellectual characteristics to these groups, often in a hierarchical manner that placed Europeans at the top. This laid groundwork for later, more explicitly racist "scientific" theories. Ongoing Scientific Racism: The legacy of these historical classifications continues to influence contemporary biases. Even when not explicitly stated, underlying assumptions about race, including the "brown" stereotype, can manifest in: Medical biases: For example, how pain is perceived and treated in different racial groups. Forensic anthropology: Where skeletal remains are "raced" based on outdated and often inaccurate typologies. Genetic studies: Misinterpretations of genetic variation leading to racial essentialism. Algorithmic bias: Where AI systems, trained on biased data, perpetuate and amplify existing societal prejudices. In conclusion, your statement is a powerful and accurate indictment of the historical and ongoing harm caused by racializing Hispanic or Latino people through "brown" stereotypes. It correctly identifies this as a form of scientific racism with deep historical roots and contemporary manifestations:::he is the statement AI confirms is correct: Othering hispanic or latino people as "brown" stereotypes is harmful and racialist and there's over 500 years of it going back to before Carl Linnaeus is racism and racialism which is ongoing scientific racism. Here is what AI confirms about racialist racist labeling and otherring that is so utterly damaging to people they other, and remunerate from on YT and here: Othering hispanic or latino people as "brown" stereotypes is harmful and racialist and there's over 500 years of it going back to before Carl Linnaeus is racism. Don't get caught by AI being ignorant, especially in this settler colony.

Alexx T. Holden

“This guy named Sam Harris, who we’re not going to talk about.” You’re godamned right, we’re not. But also, we probably should. 👀

Pat

“The definition game” is one of the great times my stupid mistake of taking Latin instead of Spanish paid off. The Allosaurus example was good, but my go to is always Hippopotamus. The literal translation of hippopotamus is “river horse.” They allegedly got their name when colonizers found them and thought they looked like giant horses when they could only see the top of their head and nostrils. Are hippos horses? Of course not! Just another reason to always be wary when someone talks about a word’s root definition

notkeiraknightley

I finally have mental capacity after the end of the school year and out of province move. But wow fuck me I am 9:57 in and Idk if I can do this because he sucks so so hard. Obv I'm going to watch it but I'm yelling at him a lot. What a whiny dribbling piece of annoying garbage that won't stay in the trash can.

Bonnybedlam

What I took from this is Jordan Peterson wouldn't hide Jews in his attic.