Home
Creators
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register Favorites Keys Review DMs Logout
Community
Telegram ThePornDude
Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout

NEW category vote -> your choice! [CLOSED!] (Patreon)

Published:
2021-08-29 13:26:32
Edited:
2021-12-30 10:20:59
Imported:
2026-06
Tags:

Poll

NEW category vote -> your choice!

  • Sounds ok....but overthink the concept (my idea in the comments) 3
  • No way! Can´t think about a C&G release without a great/complex show anymore! 11
  • ....where....is....my......lube.....DO IT! finally for the sake of wank! 76
  • 2021-08-29
  • 90 votes
{'title': 'NEW category vote -> your choice!', 'choices': [{'text': 'Sounds ok....but overthink the concept (my idea in the comments)', 'votes': 3}, {'text': 'No way! Can´t think about a C&G release without a great/complex show anymore!', 'votes': 11}, {'text': '....where....is....my......lube.....DO IT! finally for the sake of wank!', 'votes': 76}], 'closes_at': None, 'created_at': datetime.datetime(2021, 8, 29, 13, 26, 32, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc), 'description': None, 'allow_multiple': False, 'total_votes': 90}

Content

We´re back from vaccation with a ton of new ideas & improvements!One thing what always comes in our minds while thinking about our studio and shows is the fact they´re always pretty "full" and "massive". A good thing in the first instance. But can´t we just do something...let´s say more easy to watch and to enjoy too? More erotic, more focus with less covering show? We think yes! of course! So what we would like to do is creating a new category of MoCap style we would like to call the "Booty2Lap" Series.This would be the core features of the series....-> Slow to mid speed Booty shake / swing-> Reduced show elements and improved FPS-> Designed for posession (means the girl will dance close to the male character without direct interaction like for example in a "touchy booty shake dance")-> Male part is NOT animated-> Moments of standing still & posing instead of dancing the whole time (ideal for short interacion with the model with your posessed hands for example)-> Room will only have a basic and repetitive setup through the series.-> Focus is the fitting hip/body movement and close behaviour of the modelOverall its a bit of "back to the roots" also combined with our todays experience and models. The core thought behind this is just to leave the "show" focus and put a total focus on the girl & you again.What do you think? Please leave a vote and a comment! Also if you have any suggestions how to improve this new category we would be greatful to hear!Your C&G-STUDIO

Comments

Chris

Lube haha nice. The best thing you ever did (for me) was the simple chair dance because it worked well and the attention to detail from mirrors to mocap to plug in to performance to vr friendly etc was all spot on! And the female look was perfect (though I prefer your towl dancing girl lol). So as you've gone all in with the big spectacle performance heavy scenes maybe now take not a step back..but a step sideways with a smaller scene but equally detailed. And give your users choice (and surprise). I always loved that you could pause but still continue allowing multiple user generated micro scenes and sex acts within the overall arc of the performance. If that makes sense. If not I'll draw you a detailed sketch with my lube resistance crayons lol Keep up the good work guys and gals! (Hope you had a nice hol ;).

Tom VR Explorer

If I feel like playing any of the C&G scenes, Booty Shake Dance Vol.6 is what I play 90% of the time, 9% the rest of Booty Shake series, 1% the rest. The rest have very little replayability and/or feature this huge lady with unrealistically large proportions and what looks like permanent goose bumps on her skin. You could try and cater to people who don't prefer massive tits and huge butts. I know I can replace the models in the scene (I always remove the guy, you add enough epilepsy-inducing effects as is to destroy performance anyway) but it's not the same. Anyway, don't take this comment the wrong way, you are pioneers, you are experimenting, but try and make atmospheric Booty Shake vol. 8, 9, 10... without all the flashing lights.

Andrea Epis

I like the spectacle scenes but they are performance killers. Also really like the scenes of dancers close to sitting guy possessable. Maybe you can blend a first part with a complex show with a second part closer to the viewer (possessed character) with small interactions like caressing and girlbodies moving ontop.

Andrea Epis

Offtopic: maybe you can think about creating a megapack for new members or clean install of VaM. It's really a mess reinstalling every scene one by one, with a lot of different passwords. And all the third party packs

idolking

I'm not very good at English, so I apologize if my interpretation of this topic is wrong. I think it is better to have fewer characters in a work. I often feel uncomfortable with the movement in terms of PC performance. It's best to have only one female character for my personal preference, so that you don't have to disable soft body physics, and you don't have to reduce the lighting, but the FPS won't drop as much. I think you can wait for VAM2 before making a big project.

Kinski

i like the idea of going "back to the roots", since i still think that your first scenes are the best (good to see, that you start remaking them). i personally don't like the multi-character scenes at all (i find them a bit akward and uncanny honestly). also, i'm not a big fan of the super complex light shows and effects. i do think they are very well done artistically, but i feel that they are sometimes used as cover up for bland choreography and generic edm music. so my wish would be to take some inspiration from your earlier work and simply do fun and sexy single dancer choreographies with striptease elements to some catchy and fun tunes (see "dark horse", "hey mama" etc.). also less fog and less glowing orbs please. they look great, but also make every scene feel "otherwordly" and in the end make every scene feel similar... please don't take my critique too seriously. i still think, you're doing great work! i wouldn't be here otherwise.

Kinski

i never thought about you having to do the choreography blindfolded. it's probably quite challenging. maybe i'm wrong, but i was under the impression that your choreographies were somewhat affected by your decision to only go with royalty free music. i think your best, most fun and expressive choreos were done to pop-music by mainstream artists and this comes from someone who actually kinda dislikes pop-music.

Simplex X

I've really come to appreciate the quality of your content. The motion capture you create do an amazing job of avoiding the uncanny valley that so many other scenes plunge into. The stiff leg walks, or awkward robotic moments and weird eye looks really detract from the experience. It is why I come back to your scenes time and time again. Additionally, the Dance scenes are much easier to swap out models because they avoid a lot of the issues with model interaction such as collision distortion and missed docking. This is a long way of saying, I'm happy to see you move more towards lap dancing, or any type of scene where the models make a connection with the viewer. I think 'Designed for Possession" is one of my favorite effects, and having dances and interactions where the model comes into your personal space and through "auto expressions" and "Eye contact" really creates to the illusion of a real connection or interaction. Think of winking, blowing a kiss, smiling at, waving too coyly, moving close to, dropping clothing on, draping scarf around the target/viewer is such a way that makes you feel as if you are both there, and that there is a real interaction and flirtation. Think of how a spouse or partner might act, not a paid dancer. (if that makes sense). I hope whatever you do, you keep to your fundamentals and build not only something that is artistic, but also an experience that drawls you into the scene personally.